Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. What is the difference between animals and plants?

What is the difference between animals and plants?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
36 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E ensger

    You say no, but it is yes. Light is the answer, as I know. Plants get their energy from light - animals from plants or other animals. The trap is - there are not only plants and animals on our planet. Mashrooms are a third one, and maybe you talked about another one! :rose::rose:

    C Offline
    C Offline
    Chris S Kaiser
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Yeah, I was watching Discovery Channel, or one of those, the other day and they were surprised at the new species they discovered living without light, plants. They gathered what they needed from the chemicals in around them, also there were some species living in like 500 degrees F as well. I think our current clasifications might be a little limited. What about the Venus fly trap though? That one is a plant that eats animals, well, insects. This statement is false.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E ensger

      I once heared this question, and I am honest, I did not know. So I ask you to be honest and to answer, before looking in books ore to ask wikipedia ore something else in the internet. It's such a simple question, I was not able to answer, but I would like to know - is it just me??

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Marc Clifton
      wrote on last edited by
      #23

      Animals have a physical, etheric and astral body. Plants only have a physical and ether body. (Incidentally, man has an additional ego body). Marc Pensieve

      Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson

      People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E ensger

        I once heared this question, and I am honest, I did not know. So I ask you to be honest and to answer, before looking in books ore to ask wikipedia ore something else in the internet. It's such a simple question, I was not able to answer, but I would like to know - is it just me??

        P Offline
        P Offline
        Photonman007
        wrote on last edited by
        #24

        Yes...The difference is the rigid cell wall thing, and in addition chloroplasts and cholorophyll. Yes, Mushrooms are fungi and not plants. Those things at the bottom of the ocean are inbetween being plants and their own thing (if they aren't a completely different kingdom altogether (I don't remember)) They are called chemophages, from the greek for "chemical" (basically) and "eat" Locomotion has little to do with plant/animal, and neither does sneezing; however hiccuping is very important to distinguish plants from animals.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris S Kaiser

          Well, not all plants use chlorophyll, there are some plants they discovered down deep in the ocean where there is no light, and they synthesize what they need from the chemicals found around them. So... light is out of the question. Do Coral eat? Venus fly traps eat flies. I am so trying not to google. :doh:;P) This statement is false.

          R Offline
          R Offline
          RoswellNX
          wrote on last edited by
          #25

          Chris S Kaiser wrote:

          there are some plants they discovered down deep in the ocean where there is no light, and they synthesize what they need from the chemicals found around them

          They aren't plants, they are actually primitive bacteria that feed on sulfur-based chemical compounds comming from thermal vents. And the things you saw are tube-worms(contrary to their name thay aren't really worms either) that grow around those vents in the ocean floor and feed on the bacteria. But like plants, those bacteria are autotrophes, that is producers. Animals are the consumers, and so are some bacteria (think E. coli), protozoa like amoeba, venus-flytrap type plants, coral (i believe those guys eat plankton, which are little one-celled ocean dwelling organisms, including diatoms). Roswell :)

          "Angelinos -- excuse me. There will be civility today."
          Antonio VillaRaigosa
          City Mayor, Los Angeles, CA

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R RoswellNX

            Chris S Kaiser wrote:

            there are some plants they discovered down deep in the ocean where there is no light, and they synthesize what they need from the chemicals found around them

            They aren't plants, they are actually primitive bacteria that feed on sulfur-based chemical compounds comming from thermal vents. And the things you saw are tube-worms(contrary to their name thay aren't really worms either) that grow around those vents in the ocean floor and feed on the bacteria. But like plants, those bacteria are autotrophes, that is producers. Animals are the consumers, and so are some bacteria (think E. coli), protozoa like amoeba, venus-flytrap type plants, coral (i believe those guys eat plankton, which are little one-celled ocean dwelling organisms, including diatoms). Roswell :)

            "Angelinos -- excuse me. There will be civility today."
            Antonio VillaRaigosa
            City Mayor, Los Angeles, CA

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Chris S Kaiser
            wrote on last edited by
            #26

            Ahhh... ok.. That's what I get for guessing. ;) This statement is false.

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Marc Clifton

              Animals have a physical, etheric and astral body. Plants only have a physical and ether body. (Incidentally, man has an additional ego body). Marc Pensieve

              Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson

              People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Jorgen Sigvardsson
              wrote on last edited by
              #27

              etheric? astral? :~ I can buy the astral aspect, as we're all star poop. But that includes plants too. :)

              -- From the network that brought you "The Simpsons"

              M G 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • E ensger

                I once heared this question, and I am honest, I did not know. So I ask you to be honest and to answer, before looking in books ore to ask wikipedia ore something else in the internet. It's such a simple question, I was not able to answer, but I would like to know - is it just me??

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jeremy Falcon
                wrote on last edited by
                #28

                Plants do not have a brain. Nor do they have a memory, eyes (as we do, but they can still process light), ears, etc. Their only stimuli into this existence would be touch, I suspect (think of a Venus fly trap). I'd wager plants aren't self-aware by our standards (no memory makes it difficult), but they can be based on primitive standards. Jeremy Falcon

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                  etheric? astral? :~ I can buy the astral aspect, as we're all star poop. But that includes plants too. :)

                  -- From the network that brought you "The Simpsons"

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Marc Clifton
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #29

                  Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:

                  I can buy the astral aspect, as we're all star poop. But that includes plants too.

                  Occasionally I let loose with a bit of Anthroposophy. That question, and it's answer, is one of the core concepts of spiritual science. :) Marc Pensieve

                  Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson

                  People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • E ensger

                    I once heared this question, and I am honest, I did not know. So I ask you to be honest and to answer, before looking in books ore to ask wikipedia ore something else in the internet. It's such a simple question, I was not able to answer, but I would like to know - is it just me??

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Raj Lal
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #30

                    animals are mobile and plants are not simple :) QED Omit Needless Words - Strunk, William, Jr.


                    Online Project Management
                    Universal DBA | Ajax Rating | ExplorerTree

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Chris S Kaiser

                      Neither a plant nor an animal. Its a fungi. Different class altogether. Technically not alive in the traditional sense. This statement is false.

                      K Offline
                      K Offline
                      Kent Sharkey
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #31

                      Different kingdom even (the currently recognized five kingdoms of organisms: archebacteria, bacteria, animals, plants and fungi). The point someone else made is the defining characteristic I think (been a loooong time since University): plants have cell walls, animals do not. Fungi have cell walls, but it is of a different material and there is usually a "hole" in them, allowing cellular material to pass between the cells. For completeness, bacteria also have cell walls (different material) and different ribosomes and DNA composition. Archebacteria are. just. weird. -------------- TTFN - Kent

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Chris S Kaiser

                        Ahhh... ok.. That's what I get for guessing. ;) This statement is false.

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        RoswellNX
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #32

                        Chris S Kaiser wrote:

                        Ahhh... ok.. That's what I get for guessing.

                        feel free to ask me this type of questions :) I just finished a semester of Bio, so this stuff is fresh in my memory and it's one of the things i read about in my spare time Roswell

                        "Angelinos -- excuse me. There will be civility today."
                        Antonio VillaRaigosa
                        City Mayor, Los Angeles, CA

                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E ensger

                          And they don't like small talk:-D

                          A Offline
                          A Offline
                          Astricks
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #33

                          The ents in LOTR walk, talk and conspire.. BTW has your name any significance? i suspect it's ents+tiger ?:laugh:

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Astricks

                            Bob will not sneeze; does it mean he is a vegetable?

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            Gary R Wheeler
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #34

                            Well, he is green.


                            Software Zen: delete this;

                            Fold With Us![^]

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                              etheric? astral? :~ I can buy the astral aspect, as we're all star poop. But that includes plants too. :)

                              -- From the network that brought you "The Simpsons"

                              G Offline
                              G Offline
                              Gary R Wheeler
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #35

                              Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:

                              we're all star poop

                              :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:


                              Software Zen: delete this;

                              Fold With Us![^]

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R RoswellNX

                                Chris S Kaiser wrote:

                                Ahhh... ok.. That's what I get for guessing.

                                feel free to ask me this type of questions :) I just finished a semester of Bio, so this stuff is fresh in my memory and it's one of the things i read about in my spare time Roswell

                                "Angelinos -- excuse me. There will be civility today."
                                Antonio VillaRaigosa
                                City Mayor, Los Angeles, CA

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                Chris S Kaiser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #36

                                I might take you up on that.. I'm a curoius sort of fellow. ;) This statement is false.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups