Fox News jokes about killing Obama
-
You're so intellectually dishonest ... and, in case it's not clear or you don't properly understand English, to be "intellectually dishonest" is worse than to be a mere "liar."
Worse? How so? Isn't it a form of lying?
-
Worse? How so? Isn't it a form of lying?
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Ilíon: (to DemonChow) You're so intellectually dishonest ... and, in case it's not clear or you don't properly understand English, to be "intellectually dishonest" is worse than to be a mere "liar." Ravel H. Joyce: Worse? How so? Isn't it a form of lying?
Is engaging in 'hyopcrisy' worse than merely 'lying?' [Ravel: "Um. Yes?"] How can this be? "Isn't ['hyopcrisy'] a form of lying?" The difference between mere, or general, 'lying' and 'intellectual dishonesty' is like the difference betweeen tactics and strategy.
-
Get back under the rock again!
-
DemonPossessed wrote:
The point the video made is how unprofessional fox news is.
No more or less than any other news broadcaster that makes mistakes: happens all the time: they're called bloopers. Besides, picking on Fox is a little unfair: they all have bias whether or not they admit to it which is why I channel hop for news: try to get a full picture and if the odd joke is made or someone fucks up, so what? That's entertainment...
digital man wrote:
No more or less than any other news broadcaster that makes mistakes: happens all the time: they're called bloopers
I think it was more to do with the "joke" that it would be good to "knock off" Obama. While bloopers do happen this additional comment was not part of the blooper. The blooper had already happened at that point.
Recent blog posts: * Introduction to LINQ to XML (Part 1) - (Part 2) - (part 3) My website | Blog
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Ilíon: (to DemonChow) You're so intellectually dishonest ... and, in case it's not clear or you don't properly understand English, to be "intellectually dishonest" is worse than to be a mere "liar." Ravel H. Joyce: Worse? How so? Isn't it a form of lying?
Is engaging in 'hyopcrisy' worse than merely 'lying?' [Ravel: "Um. Yes?"] How can this be? "Isn't ['hyopcrisy'] a form of lying?" The difference between mere, or general, 'lying' and 'intellectual dishonesty' is like the difference betweeen tactics and strategy.
Well, fine then!
modified on Monday, May 26, 2008 8:53 AM
-
WormBait wrote:
Get back under the rock again!
Slither back into your slimy hole under the rock!
Ilíon wrote:
WormBait wrote: Get back under the rock again! Slither back into your slimy hole under the rock!
Bleaugh! That was definitely one of your poorest comebacks ever. X|
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Ilíon: (to DemonChow) You're so intellectually dishonest ... and, in case it's not clear or you don't properly understand English, to be "intellectually dishonest" is worse than to be a mere "liar." Ravel H. Joyce: Worse? How so? Isn't it a form of lying?
Is engaging in 'hyopcrisy' worse than merely 'lying?' [Ravel: "Um. Yes?"] How can this be? "Isn't ['hyopcrisy'] a form of lying?" The difference between mere, or general, 'lying' and 'intellectual dishonesty' is like the difference betweeen tactics and strategy.
-
digital man wrote:
No more or less than any other news broadcaster that makes mistakes: happens all the time: they're called bloopers
I think it was more to do with the "joke" that it would be good to "knock off" Obama. While bloopers do happen this additional comment was not part of the blooper. The blooper had already happened at that point.
Recent blog posts: * Introduction to LINQ to XML (Part 1) - (Part 2) - (part 3) My website | Blog
Well I stand (or, in this case, sit) corrected.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjYpkvcmog0[^]
I'm a Christian: I *know* that I'm perverted. - Ilion
Oh look they made a movie about it.[^]
MrPlankton
-
Ilíon wrote:
WormBait wrote: Get back under the rock again! Slither back into your slimy hole under the rock!
Bleaugh! That was definitely one of your poorest comebacks ever. X|
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
Color Commentator: "The judges gave him an average score of only 1.6, Brad. He'll have to do better than this if he going to maintain his standing in the I-Hate-Everyone league. Are you hearing anything from the coaches about their reaction to his poor showing?"
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
You're so intellectually dishonest ... and, in case it's not clear or you don't properly understand English, to be "intellectually dishonest" is worse than to be a mere "liar."
Ilíon wrote:
You're so intellectually dishonest ... and, in case it's not clear or you don't properly understand English, to be "intellectually dishonest" is worse than to be a mere "liar."
Did you just copy and paste this out of your repository of random insults?
I'm a Christian: I *know* that I'm perverted. - Ilion
-
Ilíon wrote:
the difference betweeen tactics and strategy.
Your knowledge of these is based on what?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
The stuff he pulls out of his ass.
-
The stuff he pulls out of his ass.
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
The stuff he pulls out of his ass.
Some how I'm quite sure he's never served a day in any country's military - probably a conscientious objector until they ended the draft.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface
-
Well, fine then!
modified on Monday, May 26, 2008 8:53 AM
-
Ah, superb logic there, admiral! :cool:
-
Ilíon wrote:
WormBait wrote: Get back under the rock again! Slither back into your slimy hole under the rock!
Bleaugh! That was definitely one of your poorest comebacks ever. X|
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
Brady Kelly wrote:
WormBait: Get back under the rock again! Ilíon Slither back into your slimy hole under the rock! Brady Kelly Bleaugh! That was definitely one of your poorest comebacks ever. X|
And why do you imagine that WormBait's unique, thoughtful and entertaining "insult" (one really must call that an "insult," with scare-quotes) deserves better? Where is it written that I am required to put more thought into the comebacke than you children put into the "insults?"
-
Brady Kelly wrote:
WormBait: Get back under the rock again! Ilíon Slither back into your slimy hole under the rock! Brady Kelly Bleaugh! That was definitely one of your poorest comebacks ever. X|
And why do you imagine that WormBait's unique, thoughtful and entertaining "insult" (one really must call that an "insult," with scare-quotes) deserves better? Where is it written that I am required to put more thought into the comebacke than you children put into the "insults?"
It is implied by your asserted intellectual superiority. And, where did I say the OI deserved better?
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
-
It is implied by your asserted intellectual superiority. And, where did I say the OI deserved better?
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
Brady Kelly wrote:
It is implied by your asserted intellectual superiority.
I'm intellectually superior? I understand that you fellows seem to fear this is the case. But, regardless, and once again, how does my alleged intellectual superiority require that I put more effort into a response to an "insult" than was first put into the insult?
Brady Kelly wrote:
And, where did I say the OI deserved better?
You *faulted* me for the poor showing of my comeback to the OI. That certainlty seems to me to more than imply that the OI deserved a better response. So, apparently, your post was pointless?
-
Brady Kelly wrote:
It is implied by your asserted intellectual superiority.
I'm intellectually superior? I understand that you fellows seem to fear this is the case. But, regardless, and once again, how does my alleged intellectual superiority require that I put more effort into a response to an "insult" than was first put into the insult?
Brady Kelly wrote:
And, where did I say the OI deserved better?
You *faulted* me for the poor showing of my comeback to the OI. That certainlty seems to me to more than imply that the OI deserved a better response. So, apparently, your post was pointless?
Ilíon wrote:
So, apparently, your post was pointless?
If, in the same sense as any of yours, that it made no difference to anything, except the content of the SB, then, yes, I acknowledge it was pointless. So what?
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely
-
Ilíon wrote:
So, apparently, your post was pointless?
If, in the same sense as any of yours, that it made no difference to anything, except the content of the SB, then, yes, I acknowledge it was pointless. So what?
Semicolons: The number one seller of ostomy bags world wide. - dan neely