Dropbox or Github or whatever
-
Hi all, I'm currently working on a project that because of the current climate ( COV and his mates ) I need to be able to access remotely, I have been using Dropbox and directly opening the project from there , but, I'm sure there's a better way of doing this. Never used Github before ( although I do have an account ) would this be a more efficient / correct way of doing this ? Any advice would be good
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
-
Hi all, I'm currently working on a project that because of the current climate ( COV and his mates ) I need to be able to access remotely, I have been using Dropbox and directly opening the project from there , but, I'm sure there's a better way of doing this. Never used Github before ( although I do have an account ) would this be a more efficient / correct way of doing this ? Any advice would be good
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
As long as you are the only person working on the project, a local copy - via Dropbox or any - is more than enough... If it is a team-effort, go for git...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
-
Hi all, I'm currently working on a project that because of the current climate ( COV and his mates ) I need to be able to access remotely, I have been using Dropbox and directly opening the project from there , but, I'm sure there's a better way of doing this. Never used Github before ( although I do have an account ) would this be a more efficient / correct way of doing this ? Any advice would be good
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
Go with GitHub: not only do you get file access from multiple l=laces, but you get change logging, rewinding when you screw up, and an unofficial-and-not-to-be-relied-upon-in-isolation backup system. It's not too bad to use at all: This was my early experience: Getting started with GIT, Visual Studio, and BitBucket[^] but know that it's owned by MS, it's a whole load easier: using git with visual studio 2019 - Google search[^] will give you loads of info.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt -
As long as you are the only person working on the project, a local copy - via Dropbox or any - is more than enough... If it is a team-effort, go for git...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
Even as a one-man-band, Github is better: you get change logging, rewinding, and such like as well as source distribution.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
Hi all, I'm currently working on a project that because of the current climate ( COV and his mates ) I need to be able to access remotely, I have been using Dropbox and directly opening the project from there , but, I'm sure there's a better way of doing this. Never used Github before ( although I do have an account ) would this be a more efficient / correct way of doing this ? Any advice would be good
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
If you have the possibility / you want to host it, you might go for Subversion as well (i.e. Tortoise)
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
Go with GitHub: not only do you get file access from multiple l=laces, but you get change logging, rewinding when you screw up, and an unofficial-and-not-to-be-relied-upon-in-isolation backup system. It's not too bad to use at all: This was my early experience: Getting started with GIT, Visual Studio, and BitBucket[^] but know that it's owned by MS, it's a whole load easier: using git with visual studio 2019 - Google search[^] will give you loads of info.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
OriginalGriff wrote:
...you get change logging, rewinding when you screw up, and an...
"screw up"??? that's features man, new features. it's also ms SOP: how do you think we got those great new versions of windows after 7?
pestilence [ pes-tl-uh ns ] noun 1. a deadly or virulent epidemic disease. especially bubonic plague. 2. something that is considered harmful, destructive, or evil. Synonyms: pest, plague, people
-
Even as a one-man-band, Github is better: you get change logging, rewinding, and such like as well as source distribution.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
Go with GitHub: not only do you get file access from multiple l=laces, but you get change logging, rewinding when you screw up, and an unofficial-and-not-to-be-relied-upon-in-isolation backup system. It's not too bad to use at all: This was my early experience: Getting started with GIT, Visual Studio, and BitBucket[^] but know that it's owned by MS, it's a whole load easier: using git with visual studio 2019 - Google search[^] will give you loads of info.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
Is bitbucket part of Github ?
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
No, BitBucket was / is a separate GIT server. I use GitHub now - unlimited private repositories for free with up to three collaborators!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
That's what I'm thinking Paul - I just need to learn how to use it :^) - does it integrate ok with VS ?
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
Oh yes - a load better than SVN did. This is built into VS now, so it works almost seamlessly - you get a "Source control" menu on your projects, and "Commit" etc on your solutions.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
If you have the possibility / you want to host it, you might go for Subversion as well (i.e. Tortoise)
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
I found Tortoise OK, but would have a 'funny' at times when you tried to upload a new file rather than changes to the project (this bit the entire firm, not only me and lead to creation of the song 'Sqash The Tortise', think Elmer Fudd 'Kill de Wabbit'). I have noticed Dropbox has upgraded and changed it's interface, what & why?
-
That's what I'm thinking Paul - I just need to learn how to use it :^) - does it integrate ok with VS ?
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
There is a plug-in (for VS2017, at least) and it integrates well.
Robust Services Core | Software Techniques for Lemmings | Articles
-
Hi all, I'm currently working on a project that because of the current climate ( COV and his mates ) I need to be able to access remotely, I have been using Dropbox and directly opening the project from there , but, I'm sure there's a better way of doing this. Never used Github before ( although I do have an account ) would this be a more efficient / correct way of doing this ? Any advice would be good
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
I use Dropbox to allow the code to follow me from machine to machine but it only works when there is one developer - me. For all other times you need GIT. We don't use Github, we use TFS (or Azure DevOps as its now known) but GIT is the mechanism for talking to it. It is well integrated into VS 2017.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
-
Hi all, I'm currently working on a project that because of the current climate ( COV and his mates ) I need to be able to access remotely, I have been using Dropbox and directly opening the project from there , but, I'm sure there's a better way of doing this. Never used Github before ( although I do have an account ) would this be a more efficient / correct way of doing this ? Any advice would be good
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
I suppose there's no reason you couldn't share a git repo via dropbox instead of a proper git hosting solution (github, gitlab, bitbucket, etc); but unless pointyhaired IT makes getting approval to use additional 3rd party services hard and DB is already on the white list I don't understand why you'd want to. The important part is that you should already be using some sort of source control, git or otherwise.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt
-
I found Tortoise OK, but would have a 'funny' at times when you tried to upload a new file rather than changes to the project (this bit the entire firm, not only me and lead to creation of the song 'Sqash The Tortise', think Elmer Fudd 'Kill de Wabbit'). I have noticed Dropbox has upgraded and changed it's interface, what & why?
I've been using TortoiseSVN and then TortoiseGit for the last 20 years, and can't recall any 'funny' issues caused by Tortoise itself: any problems we ever had were typically caused by the network, or the repository server. The only problems we've ever had with 'uploading' a file (did you mean add to repository?) occurred when we tried to add very large files ( > 50 MB ) to a GIT repository. But that's not a Tortoise problem, it's a GIT problem: you have to use GitLFS for large files, and then you need to properly set up TortoiseGIT so it uses the correct command on push.
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
-
I've been using TortoiseSVN and then TortoiseGit for the last 20 years, and can't recall any 'funny' issues caused by Tortoise itself: any problems we ever had were typically caused by the network, or the repository server. The only problems we've ever had with 'uploading' a file (did you mean add to repository?) occurred when we tried to add very large files ( > 50 MB ) to a GIT repository. But that's not a Tortoise problem, it's a GIT problem: you have to use GitLFS for large files, and then you need to properly set up TortoiseGIT so it uses the correct command on push.
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
Hmmm, we moved to something else (CVS?) and then proper GIT. :)
-
Hmmm, we moved to something else (CVS?) and then proper GIT. :)
So you changed the VCS because you had trouble using the Explorer plugin? :omg: Do you tear your house down when you don't like the color of your wall paper? :doh: Sounds very much like Tortoise wasn't the problem at all, and whoever decided to switch to CVS was either well aware of that, or entirely clueless. To his benefit, I'll assume the former. :suss:
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
