Regarding licenses of individual files
-
Hi,
Some articles have CPOL mentioned on top and bottom description.
But individual files in the source code have different license texts.
For example:// Written by Chris Maunder (chris@codeproject.com)
4 // Copyright 1998-2005.
5 //
6 // TextProgressCtrl is a drop-in replacement for the standard
7 // CProgressCtrl that displays text in a progress control.
8 //
9 // Homepage: http://www.codeproject.com/miscctrl/text\_progressctrl.asp
10 //
11 // This code may be used in compiled form in any way you desire. This
12 // file may be redistributed by any means PROVIDING it is not sold for
13 // profit without the author's written consent, and providing that this
14 // notice and the author's name is included. If the source code in
15 // this file is used in any commercial application then an email to
16 // me would be nice.
17 //
18 // This file is provided "as is" with no expressed or implied warranty.
19 // The author accepts no liability if it causes any damage to your
20 // computer or anything else vaguely within its vicinity.
21 //
22 // Expect bugs.
23 //
24 // Please use and enjoy. Please let me know of any bugs/mods/improvements
25 // that you have found/implemented and I will fix/incorporate them into this
26 // file.My question is when an author posts his code on Code Project, does his license override CPOL or the license statement in the individual file stands for the particular file and CPOL is for the files with no explicit license?