Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. A function pointer problem...

A function pointer problem...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
help
18 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B BadKarma

    Hi, You can alsoo change AFunction to

    void AFunction(void(CAClass::*pFunction)())
    {
    //i am still innocent
    }

    this way you can pass a pointer to a member function. This said you will need to have an object of the type CAClass available to execute the function. codito ergo sum

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Owner drawn
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Hmm...Cool:cool::rose: Nice one.

    BadKarma wrote:

    //i am still innocent

    Now that's funny...He he:laugh:

    Jesus Loves:rose:

    --Owner Drawn:rose: --Nothing special --Defeat is temporary but surrender is permanent --Never say quits --Jesus is Lord:rose:

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • O Owner drawn

      Yeah it works with static, but why not with member functions. Sounds silly but still would like to know. Since it is also a function. Edit:Thanks a lot prakash.

      Jesus Loves:rose:

      --Owner Drawn:rose: --Nothing special --Defeat is temporary but surrender is permanent --Never say quits --Jesus is Lord:rose:

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Prakash Nadar
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Owner drawn wrote:

      Sounds silly but still would like to know. Since it is also a function.

      no its not silly, coz it has a good logic behind it, member function has a different "hidden" signature than other functions.


      -Prakash

      O 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Prakash Nadar

        Owner drawn wrote:

        Sounds silly but still would like to know. Since it is also a function.

        no its not silly, coz it has a good logic behind it, member function has a different "hidden" signature than other functions.


        -Prakash

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Owner drawn
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Mr.Prakash wrote:

        no its not silly

        :)

        Mr.Prakash wrote:

        coz it has a good logic behind it, member function has a different "hidden" signature than other functions.

        Yea you are right.

        K 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • O Owner drawn

          Mr.Prakash wrote:

          no its not silly

          :)

          Mr.Prakash wrote:

          coz it has a good logic behind it, member function has a different "hidden" signature than other functions.

          Yea you are right.

          K Offline
          K Offline
          Kedar Potdar
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          [Message Deleted]

          P O 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • K Kedar Potdar

            [Message Deleted]

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Prakash Nadar
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            kdar wrote:

            The functions are mangled so that they can be uniquely identified and called upon invocation

            no you are wrong. mangling is nothing to do with it. mangaling is more relevant for compilers and linkers. The hidden param is the this param passed to the member functions.


            -Prakash

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Kedar Potdar

              [Message Deleted]

              O Offline
              O Offline
              Owner drawn
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              kdar wrote:

              The functions are mangled so that they can be uniquely identified and called upon invocation

              :doh:How. Can you please elaborate. It would be helpful. Edit:Where did he go:confused:Jesus Loves:rose:

              --Owner Drawn:rose: --Nothing special --Defeat is temporary but surrender is permanent --Never say quits --Jesus is Lord:rose: -- modified at 6:47 Thursday 12th January, 2006

              P T 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • O Owner drawn

                kdar wrote:

                The functions are mangled so that they can be uniquely identified and called upon invocation

                :doh:How. Can you please elaborate. It would be helpful. Edit:Where did he go:confused:Jesus Loves:rose:

                --Owner Drawn:rose: --Nothing special --Defeat is temporary but surrender is permanent --Never say quits --Jesus is Lord:rose: -- modified at 6:47 Thursday 12th January, 2006

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Prakash Nadar
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Owner drawn wrote:

                Edit:Where did he go

                he left coz he could not support his theory.:rolleyes:


                -Prakash

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O Owner drawn

                  kdar wrote:

                  The functions are mangled so that they can be uniquely identified and called upon invocation

                  :doh:How. Can you please elaborate. It would be helpful. Edit:Where did he go:confused:Jesus Loves:rose:

                  --Owner Drawn:rose: --Nothing special --Defeat is temporary but surrender is permanent --Never say quits --Jesus is Lord:rose: -- modified at 6:47 Thursday 12th January, 2006

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  toxcct
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Owner drawn wrote:

                  Edit:Where did he go

                  urgent need to go to the toilets !? :-O


                  TOXCCT >>> GEII power
                  [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VisualCalc 3.0]

                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T toxcct

                    Owner drawn wrote:

                    Edit:Where did he go

                    urgent need to go to the toilets !? :-O


                    TOXCCT >>> GEII power
                    [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VisualCalc 3.0]

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    Owner drawn
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    :zzz:

                    Jesus Loves:rose:

                    --Owner Drawn:rose: --Nothing special --Defeat is temporary but surrender is permanent --Never say quits --Jesus is Lord:rose:

                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • O Owner drawn

                      void AFunction(void(*)())
                      {
                      //i am innocent
                      }
                      //A class member function
                      void CAClass::AFunc()
                      {
                      //I am getting an error...(it's given below)
                      //is it wrong to do this
                      //or can this be done in some other way.
                      AFunction(this->AFunc);
                      }

                      error C2664: 'func' : cannot convert parameter 1 from 'void (void)' to 'void (__cdecl *)(void)'

                      Jesus Loves:rose:

                      --Owner Drawn:rose: --Nothing special --Defeat is temporary but surrender is permanent --Never say quits --Jesus is Lord:rose:

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Chris Losinger
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      i use this macro:

                      // call mem fn that takes a single int
                      #define CALL_MEMBER_FN(object,ptrToMember) ((object).*(ptrToMember)(int))

                      // fns have a single int param
                      typedef void (CObjType::*fnType)(int);

                      ...

                      // holds a pointer to mem fn
                      fnType m_fnPtr;

                      ...

                      // call it
                      CALL_MEMBER_FN(*this, fnPtr)(5);

                      Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker -- modified at 11:44 Thursday 12th January, 2006

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Cedric Moonen

                        A function member of a class doesn't have the same prototype as a global function: there is the 'this' paramter that is passed as an implicit argument of the function (but it is transparent to the user). To avoid that, you can declare your member function as static. A static function is shared aming all instances of your class and thus doesn't require the implicit 'this' parameter. But of course, within a static function, you can only access static member of your class (because the function does not belong to a specific instance of the class).

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        Blake Miller
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        within a static function, you can only access static member of your class (because the function does not belong to a specific instance of the class). Unless you also pass a pointer to the object into the functiona as an additional argument, then you can access public members and functions of the class using the pointer to the class. Marriage slows down your coding, a baby slows it down even more!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • O Owner drawn

                          :zzz:

                          Jesus Loves:rose:

                          --Owner Drawn:rose: --Nothing special --Defeat is temporary but surrender is permanent --Never say quits --Jesus is Lord:rose:

                          T Offline
                          T Offline
                          ThatsAlok
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          Owner drawn wrote:

                          ForumVisual C++ Subject:Re: Zzzz Sender:Owner drawn Date:6:56 12 Jan '06

                          don't sleep :)

                          "Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow

                          cheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups