Looking for solid C+Tree or C*-Tree source
-
I am looking for some solid, unencumbered, source for a C+Tree or, preferably, C*Tree. Note the words "unecumbered"--at most it must have a zlib type license, it cannot have any requirement to distribute the source; my client will simply not allow it. Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke
-
I am looking for some solid, unencumbered, source for a C+Tree or, preferably, C*Tree. Note the words "unecumbered"--at most it must have a zlib type license, it cannot have any requirement to distribute the source; my client will simply not allow it. Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke
You mean a tree container class, something that's compatible with STL? Or a tree view control? I was looking for tree container class myself, but didn't find much that I liked. There's one here on CP that looks quite nice, but it's LGPL so that's a no go, for me. ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF!
-
You mean a tree container class, something that's compatible with STL? Or a tree view control? I was looking for tree container class myself, but didn't find much that I liked. There's one here on CP that looks quite nice, but it's LGPL so that's a no go, for me. ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF!
Just a C+Tree with no STL (if someone has put STL on top, that's fine.) I will have to use disk (both to persist the tree and because of memory issues) so a plain C-Tree is out as is STL or MFC classes. Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke
-
I am looking for some solid, unencumbered, source for a C+Tree or, preferably, C*Tree. Note the words "unecumbered"--at most it must have a zlib type license, it cannot have any requirement to distribute the source; my client will simply not allow it. Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke
-
How about looking for it in here[^]? But I wonder whether there is a non-license component that you want. Enjoy:rose:
Anderson Sheen Reduce a time to develop your environment. It's a free! http://www.exteide.com
Uh, not to be too sarcastic, but I'm looking for C+Tree or C*Tree source code not a tree control. If you don't know the difference, don't respond. Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke
-
Uh, not to be too sarcastic, but I'm looking for C+Tree or C*Tree source code not a tree control. If you don't know the difference, don't respond. Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke
I just suggested category collection. but I didn't look for it there. Sorry, it'm my mistake. But I think it's not good to say like you by reason that you couldn't found it in my reference. My will was giving help to you although it was not help to you.
Anderson Sheen Reduce a time to develop your environment. It's a free! http://www.exteide.com
-
I am looking for some solid, unencumbered, source for a C+Tree or, preferably, C*Tree. Note the words "unecumbered"--at most it must have a zlib type license, it cannot have any requirement to distribute the source; my client will simply not allow it. Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke
If you do find a free such implementation, which is not an integrated part of a complex system such as a DBMS, please let me know. This is the kind of stuff you normally pay big bucks for. :)