converting char to unsigned int

[Cedric Moonen]

Geez :omg: That's a really complicated way of doing that !

[Aqueel]

Chaa gia hai bhai! We Believe in Excellence www.aqueelmirza.cjb.net

[thatsme_cool]

Kya cha gaya hai Yar

[Aqueel]

hahahaha What a solution yaar! Nice Unique and innovative :-D We Believe in Excellence www.aqueelmirza.cjb.net

[toxcct]

...and you said what ? :confused:

[Aqueel]

i said "Chaa gia hai bhai" which means "Great job! brother!". This is Urdu language idiom. It is used for a person who does something great. :) We Believe in Excellence www.aqueelmirza.cjb.net

[David Crow]

thepersonof wrote:

int a = int(c)

A cast is actually not necessary. You could accomplish the same with:

int a = c;

because a char gets internally promoted to an int during such operations. A char can hold values in the range -128 to 127, whereas an unsigned char can hold values in the range 0 to 255.

---

"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

[abbiyr]

Hi there. As the other replies have stated, you need to use the unsigned char for values above 127. To perform explicit conversions in C++, you should use the static_cast instead of the old C-Style casts. unsigned char c = 250; int a = static_cast<int>(c); Cheers

[David Crow]

abbiyr wrote:

To perform explicit conversions in C++, you should use the static_cast instead of the old C-Style casts.

For integral types, this is not necessary.

---

"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

[abbiyr]

Quite agree. It is not necessary, the unsigned char will be cast correctly without it. I recommended it though, as it does explicity show the intentions of the developer.