Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. Microsoft Visual C++ 1.5 Professional

Microsoft Visual C++ 1.5 Professional

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
c++question
19 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D David Crow

    Why would I want to do that? It would be illegal. :rolleyes:


    "Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

    "There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

    D Offline
    D Offline
    Daniel Zaharia
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    Because Microsoft doesn't has it anymore??? The firm where i work it is member of Microsoft Partnership Program (about the license) , but thy only have on their site M V C++ 1.52 (not professional)

    D S 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • T toxcct

      mwhahahah, nice try. even if you did get a copy (which is not legal), i doublt you could do something powerful since the standard is far from this implementation now...

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Daniel Zaharia
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      I don't need something powerfull. The problem is that that i need it to program an old barecode scaner, and it must be at most MV C++ 1.5 (16 bits??)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Daniel Zaharia

        Because Microsoft doesn't has it anymore??? The firm where i work it is member of Microsoft Partnership Program (about the license) , but thy only have on their site M V C++ 1.52 (not professional)

        D Offline
        D Offline
        David Crow
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        Daniel Zaharia wrote:

        Because Microsoft doesn't has it anymore???

        True, it has not been available for quite some time now. You might could get it from pricewatch.com[^] or the like.

        Daniel Zaharia wrote:

        but thy only have on their site M V C++ 1.52

        So what is the difference between v1.5 and v1.52?


        "Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

        "There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D David Crow

          Daniel Zaharia wrote:

          Because Microsoft doesn't has it anymore???

          True, it has not been available for quite some time now. You might could get it from pricewatch.com[^] or the like.

          Daniel Zaharia wrote:

          but thy only have on their site M V C++ 1.52

          So what is the difference between v1.5 and v1.52?


          "Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

          "There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Daniel Zaharia
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          The difference must be between MV C++1.5 and MV C++ 1.5 Professional. I the first does not support development of DOS applications

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Daniel Zaharia

            The difference must be between MV C++1.5 and MV C++ 1.5 Professional. I the first does not support development of DOS applications

            D Offline
            D Offline
            David Crow
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            Are you needing to modify an existing project, or create a new one? If the latter, could you use VC++ v6?


            "Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

            "There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D David Crow

              Are you needing to modify an existing project, or create a new one? If the latter, could you use VC++ v6?


              "Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

              "There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Daniel Zaharia
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              I need to compile a file. But it must be older that VC++ 1.5 (it must be on 16 bits)

              D A 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • D Daniel Zaharia

                I need to compile a file. But it must be older that VC++ 1.5 (it must be on 16 bits)

                D Offline
                D Offline
                David Crow
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                Daniel Zaharia wrote:

                But it must be older that VC++ 1.5 (it must be on 16 bits)

                Which i think takes you back to v1.0. Are you needing to modify an existing project, or create a new one? What is the target OS?


                "Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

                "There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D David Crow

                  Daniel Zaharia wrote:

                  But it must be older that VC++ 1.5 (it must be on 16 bits)

                  Which i think takes you back to v1.0. Are you needing to modify an existing project, or create a new one? What is the target OS?


                  "Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain

                  "There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Daniel Zaharia
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  DR DOS (not MS DOS!) It is about an barecode scanner from Symbol. They have their own operating system. They provide some examples .C and .exe. I need to modify a bit the sample file and compile it to .exe. My .exe does not work.(even if i copile exactly the same file that generated their exe). Of course, customer support is off.

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Daniel Zaharia

                    DR DOS (not MS DOS!) It is about an barecode scanner from Symbol. They have their own operating system. They provide some examples .C and .exe. I need to modify a bit the sample file and compile it to .exe. My .exe does not work.(even if i copile exactly the same file that generated their exe). Of course, customer support is off.

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    rrrado
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    and their exe works ? The problem could be somewhere else not in the compiler


                    rrrado

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R rrrado

                      and their exe works ? The problem could be somewhere else not in the compiler


                      rrrado

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Daniel Zaharia
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      Where?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Daniel Zaharia

                        I need to compile a file. But it must be older that VC++ 1.5 (it must be on 16 bits)

                        A Offline
                        A Offline
                        Alexander M
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        Write the software using assembler... then you don't have any problems :D Don't try it, just do it! ;-)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D Daniel Zaharia

                          Because Microsoft doesn't has it anymore??? The firm where i work it is member of Microsoft Partnership Program (about the license) , but thy only have on their site M V C++ 1.52 (not professional)

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Steve Mayfield
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          we use MVC 1.52 to compile DOS 6.22 applications all the time here at work...and have been for almost 10 years...as far as I know 1.52 is a complete package...I don't recall separate Standard/Pro versions. Steve

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Daniel Zaharia

                            Does somebody still has Microsoft Visual C++ 1.5 Professional?

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            Gordon Brandly
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            I agree with Steve; I don't think there were separate Standard and Pro versions. I just checked our CD here at work -- it says nothing about being any particular edition. That said, as long as Symbol gives you standard C libraries and headers, you could always use Open Watcom[^], which I understand still compiles 16-bit DOS programs.

                            D 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • G Gordon Brandly

                              I agree with Steve; I don't think there were separate Standard and Pro versions. I just checked our CD here at work -- it says nothing about being any particular edition. That said, as long as Symbol gives you standard C libraries and headers, you could always use Open Watcom[^], which I understand still compiles 16-bit DOS programs.

                              D Offline
                              D Offline
                              Daniel Zaharia
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              I'm very confused .. In the documentation they say: For writing applications for Series 3000 terminals: • The Microsoft Visual C++ 1.5 development system should be installed on your development PC. Note: It is important that you use the Microsoft Visual C++ Professional edition, and not just Microsoft Visual C++. The latter does not support the development of DOS applications. Further on in the documentation there are mix references to MV C++1.5 and MV C++ 1.52. I could not find any professional version of VC++1.52 . But the fact is that the executable that i compile with VC++1.52 is different from the one that they provide. It is slightly bigger and it isn’t fully functional (some parts doesn’t work). Any way , someone responded me from Symbol so maybe there is a chance. Thank you for you posts!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups