When does it end?
-
Cardinal urges legal action against Da Vinci Code[^] In the latest Vatican broadside against "The Da Vinci Code," a leading cardinal says Christians should respond to the book and film with legal action because both offend Christ and the Church he founded. Cardinal Francis Arinze, a Nigerian who was considered a candidate for pope last year, made his strong comments in a documentary called "The Da Vinci Code-A Masterful Deception." Arinze's appeal came some 10 days after another Vatican cardinal called for a boycott of the film. Both cardinals asserted that other religions would never stand for offences against their beliefs and that Christians should get tough. "Christians must not just sit back and say it is enough for us to forgive and to forget," Arinze said in the documentary made by Rome film maker Mario Biasetti for Rome Reports, a Catholic film agency specializing in religious affairs. Since when does anybody/everybody have a "right" to not be offended? When mankind actually succeeds in killing itself off completely, I'll bet that it won't be a political issue or even an environmental one - I'd wager that religion and some moron/zealot feeling offended will be at the heart of it. "If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done." - Peter Ustinov
-
Cardinal urges legal action against Da Vinci Code[^] In the latest Vatican broadside against "The Da Vinci Code," a leading cardinal says Christians should respond to the book and film with legal action because both offend Christ and the Church he founded. Cardinal Francis Arinze, a Nigerian who was considered a candidate for pope last year, made his strong comments in a documentary called "The Da Vinci Code-A Masterful Deception." Arinze's appeal came some 10 days after another Vatican cardinal called for a boycott of the film. Both cardinals asserted that other religions would never stand for offences against their beliefs and that Christians should get tough. "Christians must not just sit back and say it is enough for us to forgive and to forget," Arinze said in the documentary made by Rome film maker Mario Biasetti for Rome Reports, a Catholic film agency specializing in religious affairs. Since when does anybody/everybody have a "right" to not be offended? When mankind actually succeeds in killing itself off completely, I'll bet that it won't be a political issue or even an environmental one - I'd wager that religion and some moron/zealot feeling offended will be at the heart of it. "If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done." - Peter Ustinov
Mike Mullikin wrote:
Since when does anybody/everybody have a "right" to not be offended?
Since when do only Christians not have the same "right" to be offended as everyone else?
Mike Mullikin wrote:
When mankind actually succeeds in killing itself off completely, I'll bet that it won't be a political issue or even an environmental one - I'd wager that religion and some moron/zealot feeling offended will be at the heart of it.
Thats doubtful -given that political and environmental issues have historically been far more distructive to human civilization than religions has. "You get that which you tolerate" -- modified at 10:59 Sunday 7th May, 2006
-
Cardinal urges legal action against Da Vinci Code[^] In the latest Vatican broadside against "The Da Vinci Code," a leading cardinal says Christians should respond to the book and film with legal action because both offend Christ and the Church he founded. Cardinal Francis Arinze, a Nigerian who was considered a candidate for pope last year, made his strong comments in a documentary called "The Da Vinci Code-A Masterful Deception." Arinze's appeal came some 10 days after another Vatican cardinal called for a boycott of the film. Both cardinals asserted that other religions would never stand for offences against their beliefs and that Christians should get tough. "Christians must not just sit back and say it is enough for us to forgive and to forget," Arinze said in the documentary made by Rome film maker Mario Biasetti for Rome Reports, a Catholic film agency specializing in religious affairs. Since when does anybody/everybody have a "right" to not be offended? When mankind actually succeeds in killing itself off completely, I'll bet that it won't be a political issue or even an environmental one - I'd wager that religion and some moron/zealot feeling offended will be at the heart of it. "If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done." - Peter Ustinov
Wait until you hear what they have to say when the comic book version comes out. Religious zealotry has been behind some of the most savage behaviour in human history. When do you suppose the Vatican will decide to get Nukes? We need to graduate from the ridiculous notion that greed is some kind of elixir for capitalism - it's the downfall of capitalism. Self-interest, maybe, but self-interest run amok does not serve anyone. The core value of conscious capitalism is enlightened self-interest. Patricia Aburdene
-
Cardinal urges legal action against Da Vinci Code[^] In the latest Vatican broadside against "The Da Vinci Code," a leading cardinal says Christians should respond to the book and film with legal action because both offend Christ and the Church he founded. Cardinal Francis Arinze, a Nigerian who was considered a candidate for pope last year, made his strong comments in a documentary called "The Da Vinci Code-A Masterful Deception." Arinze's appeal came some 10 days after another Vatican cardinal called for a boycott of the film. Both cardinals asserted that other religions would never stand for offences against their beliefs and that Christians should get tough. "Christians must not just sit back and say it is enough for us to forgive and to forget," Arinze said in the documentary made by Rome film maker Mario Biasetti for Rome Reports, a Catholic film agency specializing in religious affairs. Since when does anybody/everybody have a "right" to not be offended? When mankind actually succeeds in killing itself off completely, I'll bet that it won't be a political issue or even an environmental one - I'd wager that religion and some moron/zealot feeling offended will be at the heart of it. "If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done." - Peter Ustinov
I find it hilarious that Santa Claus and his little gnomes are offended by a fairy tale.
-
Wait until you hear what they have to say when the comic book version comes out. Religious zealotry has been behind some of the most savage behaviour in human history. When do you suppose the Vatican will decide to get Nukes? We need to graduate from the ridiculous notion that greed is some kind of elixir for capitalism - it's the downfall of capitalism. Self-interest, maybe, but self-interest run amok does not serve anyone. The core value of conscious capitalism is enlightened self-interest. Patricia Aburdene
Rob Graham wrote:
Religious zealotry has been behind some of the most savage behaviour in human history.
Actually, thats a myth. "You get that which you tolerate"
-
Rob Graham wrote:
Religious zealotry has been behind some of the most savage behaviour in human history.
Actually, thats a myth. "You get that which you tolerate"
So the crusades, the inquisition, the 19th century witch burnings and the current islamist terrorism are all myths? Or are you suggesting that religious zealotry was merely a tool manipulated to accomplish some political aim behind all of these? We need to graduate from the ridiculous notion that greed is some kind of elixir for capitalism - it's the downfall of capitalism. Self-interest, maybe, but self-interest run amok does not serve anyone. The core value of conscious capitalism is enlightened self-interest. Patricia Aburdene -- modified at 12:22 Sunday 7th May, 2006 (I really need to work on my typing skills)
-
Rob Graham wrote:
Religious zealotry has been behind some of the most savage behaviour in human history.
Actually, thats a myth. "You get that which you tolerate"
Torqemada? The tigress is here :-D
-
Torqemada? The tigress is here :-D
-
Torqemada? The tigress is here :-D
I'll see your Torguemada with Stalin and raise you one Castro. "You get that which you tolerate"
-
I'll see your Torguemada with Stalin and raise you one Castro. "You get that which you tolerate"
He said "some", Stan, not "all".
-
Cardinal urges legal action against Da Vinci Code[^] In the latest Vatican broadside against "The Da Vinci Code," a leading cardinal says Christians should respond to the book and film with legal action because both offend Christ and the Church he founded. Cardinal Francis Arinze, a Nigerian who was considered a candidate for pope last year, made his strong comments in a documentary called "The Da Vinci Code-A Masterful Deception." Arinze's appeal came some 10 days after another Vatican cardinal called for a boycott of the film. Both cardinals asserted that other religions would never stand for offences against their beliefs and that Christians should get tough. "Christians must not just sit back and say it is enough for us to forgive and to forget," Arinze said in the documentary made by Rome film maker Mario Biasetti for Rome Reports, a Catholic film agency specializing in religious affairs. Since when does anybody/everybody have a "right" to not be offended? When mankind actually succeeds in killing itself off completely, I'll bet that it won't be a political issue or even an environmental one - I'd wager that religion and some moron/zealot feeling offended will be at the heart of it. "If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done." - Peter Ustinov
As you probably know, I am a Christian. My father is, too, and so my mother is not ( they live in a state of war ). I had a lengthy phone call from my mum to explain how this book blows apart how the church was created to oppress women, blah, blah, blah. You'd think that she was talking about something she read in a newspaper, not a work of fiction. I can understand that a lot of people would assume the book to be based on fact, and while I have no sympathy with the Catholic Church, I can see why they would mount a campaign to emphasise to those of feeble brain that it's a work of fiction. I would do it differently, I would ignore them, the same as I'd ignore the odd film that sets out to make money by offending Christians. I feel sorry for people who have no other resources than to try to make money by shocking and offending. I'm not offended, it does not affect me, or my belief, and I would certainly defend their right to their free speech, even if I do not agree. In other words, I would agree that they are handling this poorly.
Mike Mullikin wrote:
legal action because both offend Christ and the Church he founded.
That is just scary.
Mike Mullikin wrote:
I'll bet that it won't be a political issue or even an environmental one - I'd wager that religion and some moron/zealot feeling offended will be at the heart of it.
The ability of nuclear weapons makes this a possibility, but I'd not consider it likely. I think we've got inevitable environmental concerns, however long they take to manifest themselves. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
-
Rob Graham wrote:
Religious zealotry has been behind some of the most savage behaviour in human history.
Actually, thats a myth. "You get that which you tolerate"
Stan Shannon wrote:
Actually, thats a myth.
:omg: :wtf: Wow that is just... you appear to be suffering from some serious problems. May God be with you.
"What classes are you using ? You shouldn't call stuff if you have no idea what it does" Christian Graus in the C# forum led mike
-
Mike Mullikin wrote:
Since when does anybody/everybody have a "right" to not be offended?
Since when do only Christians not have the same "right" to be offended as everyone else?
Mike Mullikin wrote:
When mankind actually succeeds in killing itself off completely, I'll bet that it won't be a political issue or even an environmental one - I'd wager that religion and some moron/zealot feeling offended will be at the heart of it.
Thats doubtful -given that political and environmental issues have historically been far more distructive to human civilization than religions has. "You get that which you tolerate" -- modified at 10:59 Sunday 7th May, 2006
Stan Shannon wrote:
Since when do only Christians not have the same "right" to be offended as everyone else?
No one has the right to not be offended. "If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done." - Peter Ustinov
-
As you probably know, I am a Christian. My father is, too, and so my mother is not ( they live in a state of war ). I had a lengthy phone call from my mum to explain how this book blows apart how the church was created to oppress women, blah, blah, blah. You'd think that she was talking about something she read in a newspaper, not a work of fiction. I can understand that a lot of people would assume the book to be based on fact, and while I have no sympathy with the Catholic Church, I can see why they would mount a campaign to emphasise to those of feeble brain that it's a work of fiction. I would do it differently, I would ignore them, the same as I'd ignore the odd film that sets out to make money by offending Christians. I feel sorry for people who have no other resources than to try to make money by shocking and offending. I'm not offended, it does not affect me, or my belief, and I would certainly defend their right to their free speech, even if I do not agree. In other words, I would agree that they are handling this poorly.
Mike Mullikin wrote:
legal action because both offend Christ and the Church he founded.
That is just scary.
Mike Mullikin wrote:
I'll bet that it won't be a political issue or even an environmental one - I'd wager that religion and some moron/zealot feeling offended will be at the heart of it.
The ability of nuclear weapons makes this a possibility, but I'd not consider it likely. I think we've got inevitable environmental concerns, however long they take to manifest themselves. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Christian Graus wrote:
I would ignore them, the same as I'd ignore the odd film that sets out to make money by offending Christians.
Bingo! These folks don't understand that their protests only draw attention to something that will otherwise go away quickly on its own.
Christian Graus wrote:
The ability of nuclear weapons makes this a possibility, but I'd not consider it likely. I think we've got inevitable environmental concerns, however long they take to manifest themselves.
Nukes (or whatever is next) and/or some global environmental disaster may kill off 99% of mankind, but it will be religious zealotry that kills the final few humans. "If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done." - Peter Ustinov
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
Actually, thats a myth.
:omg: :wtf: Wow that is just... you appear to be suffering from some serious problems. May God be with you.
"What classes are you using ? You shouldn't call stuff if you have no idea what it does" Christian Graus in the C# forum led mike
The amount of violence throughout human history caused by religion is not even a fraction of a percent of that caused by completely secular reasons. Makeing such a big deal out of religious violence, rather than concentrating on the far more onerous issues of secular violence is proof that the left is not trying to solve the problem of violence, it is trying to solve the "problem" of religion. If you are so brainwashed that you cannot see that, I would suggest that you are the one with the seious problems. "You get that which you tolerate"
-
He said "some", Stan, not "all".
It would be more accurate to say that religious zealotry has not been behind most of humanity's most savage behavior. "You get that which you tolerate"
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
Since when do only Christians not have the same "right" to be offended as everyone else?
No one has the right to not be offended. "If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done." - Peter Ustinov
Then you have nothing to complain about when you are offended by the church being offended. "You get that which you tolerate"
-
Rob Graham wrote:
Religious zealotry has been behind some of the most savage behaviour in human history.
Actually, thats a myth. "You get that which you tolerate"
-
The amount of violence throughout human history caused by religion is not even a fraction of a percent of that caused by completely secular reasons. Makeing such a big deal out of religious violence, rather than concentrating on the far more onerous issues of secular violence is proof that the left is not trying to solve the problem of violence, it is trying to solve the "problem" of religion. If you are so brainwashed that you cannot see that, I would suggest that you are the one with the seious problems. "You get that which you tolerate"
I think a valid point is not that the amount of violence due to religion is so great (your point is accurate, secular violence is certainly more frequent), but that religious violence tends to become more extreme, being "sanctioned" by the perpetrators (perhaps on both sides) supreme being whose judgements are by definition infallible. Since I am not a "leftist", you can't really blame that particular brand of 'brainwashing' for my view on this... care to try another theory? Basically, my opinion is that the higher the authority used to justify the violence, the more dangerous and extreme it is likely to become (and I think history bears me out here). For any particular religion, there is no higher authority than its supreme being. On the other hand, secular violence always traces back to a few humans in positions of authority - so the justification is (a bit) weaker. We need to graduate from the ridiculous notion that greed is some kind of elixir for capitalism - it's the downfall of capitalism. Self-interest, maybe, but self-interest run amok does not serve anyone. The core value of conscious capitalism is enlightened self-interest. Patricia Aburdene
-
I think a valid point is not that the amount of violence due to religion is so great (your point is accurate, secular violence is certainly more frequent), but that religious violence tends to become more extreme, being "sanctioned" by the perpetrators (perhaps on both sides) supreme being whose judgements are by definition infallible. Since I am not a "leftist", you can't really blame that particular brand of 'brainwashing' for my view on this... care to try another theory? Basically, my opinion is that the higher the authority used to justify the violence, the more dangerous and extreme it is likely to become (and I think history bears me out here). For any particular religion, there is no higher authority than its supreme being. On the other hand, secular violence always traces back to a few humans in positions of authority - so the justification is (a bit) weaker. We need to graduate from the ridiculous notion that greed is some kind of elixir for capitalism - it's the downfall of capitalism. Self-interest, maybe, but self-interest run amok does not serve anyone. The core value of conscious capitalism is enlightened self-interest. Patricia Aburdene
Rob Graham wrote:
ince I am not a "leftist", you can't really blame that particular brand of 'brainwashing' for my view on this... care to try another theory?
I think basic Marxist dogma has so throughly satuarated the thinking of modern westerners that it is virtually impossible to not be affected by it, unless you purposefully go out of your way to identify and purge it from your thought processes. The simple truth is that religion has not been the great scourge of human society that we are currently taught to think of it as. In fact, religion as a cultural artifact can proudly claim to be among the healthier aspects of human civilization - a lot healthier than socialism has been. "You get that which you tolerate" -- modified at 19:29 Sunday 7th May, 2006