Fence 'Em In
-
But millions DID come in through the border illegally. At least a wall would stop that from happening. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking" -- modified at 15:11 Monday 5th June, 2006
There was a wall that seperated a city in Europe. A few years ago the wall was torn down finally. Before that there was another wall built called a Great Wall, can still be seen today. It did not stop the agressors, only slowed them down and forced them to learn more. No a wall is not the answer, They do not work forever, only until they can be overcome. Perhaps you should go south to make room for more here. Cheers:laugh:
-
So half of them are lazy criminal invaders. That just makes all the differnce. :rolleyes: "You get that which you tolerate"
-
kgaddy wrote:
At least a wall would stop that from happening.
Nice assumption. Hope it works better than a firewall. Hey maybe we should build the wall out of fire! :)
led mike wrote:
Nice assumption
How is that an assumption? Building a fence to keep the unwanted out works and is in pratice everyday.
led mike wrote:
Hope it works better than a firewall.
My fedora/linux firewall works pretty well. Never had a problem. And from the logs it looks like a lot tring to get through. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
-
Millions of illegal immigrants in the United States never jumped the U.S.-Mexico border where Congress wants to erect impenetrable walls and President Bush is sending National Guard troops to patrol. They never sneaked in at all. The little-acknowledged reality is that nearly half the estimated 12 million undocumented foreigners in the United States entered on bona fide U.S. visas - and simply never left.[^]
I thought this was already posted weeks back. Anyway, remember that the 9/11 hijackers also were illegals who simply overstayed their visas...
-
There was a wall that seperated a city in Europe. A few years ago the wall was torn down finally. Before that there was another wall built called a Great Wall, can still be seen today. It did not stop the agressors, only slowed them down and forced them to learn more. No a wall is not the answer, They do not work forever, only until they can be overcome. Perhaps you should go south to make room for more here. Cheers:laugh:
JCParker wrote:
There was a wall that seperated a city in Europe.
Well if you do any reading you will note that wall was to keep people in, against their will. This wall is to keep people out. It's the same as you see in any subdivision.
JCParker wrote:
Before that there was another wall built called a Great Wall, can still be seen today. It did not stop the agressors, only slowed them down and forced them to learn more.
Actually that wall was quite effective. Read here "The Great Wall offers excellent defence since it had been built in strategic places. It played an vital role then. There were many instances in ancient times that it took a very long time to take a city or mountain pass. And even cases that those who launched the attack had to retreat without a fight, for they saw the strong defence work of the city. In the Central Plain of China such firm and high defence work proved to be very useful to foil the attacks of mobile cavalry, which roamed from one place to another. As a result of Ming Dynasty's continuous construction and improvement,the Great Wall became a perfect defence network, whereby the central Chinese authority could, by means of various administrative and military levels of organization, reach the basic or grass root military unit, down to each soldier guarding the Great Wall. " A wall will not keep any military aggressors out, but it will keep criminals out. It may not stop 100%, but if it stops even 50% it will be well worth it. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
-
:laugh: Do you expect facts to have any meaning to racists? Excelent post, BTW. At a close look, no one is normal.
Caetano Veloso -
Funny...Brazil was by far the most racist country I've ever visited. Do you never leave your house or something?
I think Japan is far more racist. And the most racist people are probably the Jewish. -------- "I say no to drugs, but they don't listen." - Marilyn Manson
-
I think Japan is far more racist. And the most racist people are probably the Jewish. -------- "I say no to drugs, but they don't listen." - Marilyn Manson
You're racist for calling certain races racist.
-
You're racist for calling certain races racist.
Look who's talking. You just stated that Brazil was the most racist country. -------- "I say no to drugs, but they don't listen." - Marilyn Manson
-
:laugh: Do you expect facts to have any meaning to racists? Excelent post, BTW. At a close look, no one is normal.
Caetano VelosoI would give the "racists" more crediblity than some idiot from a third world country spouting off about how "racist" americans are for wanting to make it where third world immigrants cant just come freely and ruin our country. MOΛΩN ΛABE
-
Look who's talking. You just stated that Brazil was the most racist country. -------- "I say no to drugs, but they don't listen." - Marilyn Manson
And that racist Brazilian said that Americans are racist. I'm so confused!
-
I think Japan is far more racist. And the most racist people are probably the Jewish. -------- "I say no to drugs, but they don't listen." - Marilyn Manson
-
Michel Prévost wrote:
And the most racist people are probably the Jewish.
How are Jews "The most" racist people in world? My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
Sorry, bad phrasing, I wanted to say "the most racist people I ever met". -------- "I say no to drugs, but they don't listen." - Marilyn Manson
-
And that racist Brazilian said that Americans are racist. I'm so confused!
It is an infinite loop. -------- "I say no to drugs, but they don't listen." - Marilyn Manson
-
So half of them are lazy criminal invaders. That just makes all the differnce. :rolleyes: "You get that which you tolerate"
Stan Shannon wrote:
lazy criminal invaders.
I don't think any of those 3 words apply to the majority of them. They're neither lazy, nor criminal, nor invaders. What they are is illegal. Alvaro
The bible was written when people were even more stupid than they are today. Can you imagine that? - David Cross
-
Millions of illegal immigrants in the United States never jumped the U.S.-Mexico border where Congress wants to erect impenetrable walls and President Bush is sending National Guard troops to patrol. They never sneaked in at all. The little-acknowledged reality is that nearly half the estimated 12 million undocumented foreigners in the United States entered on bona fide U.S. visas - and simply never left.[^]
If their visa expired and they're still here, then they're illegals...
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
Stan Shannon wrote:
lazy criminal invaders.
I don't think any of those 3 words apply to the majority of them. They're neither lazy, nor criminal, nor invaders. What they are is illegal. Alvaro
The bible was written when people were even more stupid than they are today. Can you imagine that? - David Cross
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
nor criminal
Yes they are. They committed a criminal act.
-
kgaddy wrote:
At least a wall would stop that from happening.
Nice assumption. Hope it works better than a firewall. Hey maybe we should build the wall out of fire! :)
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
lazy criminal invaders.
I don't think any of those 3 words apply to the majority of them. They're neither lazy, nor criminal, nor invaders. What they are is illegal. Alvaro
The bible was written when people were even more stupid than they are today. Can you imagine that? - David Cross
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
they are is illegal.
Isnt that what a criminal is? MOΛΩN ΛABE
-
JCParker wrote:
There was a wall that seperated a city in Europe.
Well if you do any reading you will note that wall was to keep people in, against their will. This wall is to keep people out. It's the same as you see in any subdivision.
JCParker wrote:
Before that there was another wall built called a Great Wall, can still be seen today. It did not stop the agressors, only slowed them down and forced them to learn more.
Actually that wall was quite effective. Read here "The Great Wall offers excellent defence since it had been built in strategic places. It played an vital role then. There were many instances in ancient times that it took a very long time to take a city or mountain pass. And even cases that those who launched the attack had to retreat without a fight, for they saw the strong defence work of the city. In the Central Plain of China such firm and high defence work proved to be very useful to foil the attacks of mobile cavalry, which roamed from one place to another. As a result of Ming Dynasty's continuous construction and improvement,the Great Wall became a perfect defence network, whereby the central Chinese authority could, by means of various administrative and military levels of organization, reach the basic or grass root military unit, down to each soldier guarding the Great Wall. " A wall will not keep any military aggressors out, but it will keep criminals out. It may not stop 100%, but if it stops even 50% it will be well worth it. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
kgaddy wrote:
Well if you do any reading you will note that wall was to keep people in, against their will. This wall is to keep people out. It's the same as you see in any subdivision.
That's a hell of a distinction. Do you think walls to keep things out have some magical property that make them more effective than walls to keep things in? Please tell us how that works.
