Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Cut out the propaganda

Cut out the propaganda

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
csshelpquestion
40 Posts 10 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Red Stateler
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    The middle east is screwed up. Everybody knows that. Group A hates Groups B and C and vice versa, etc..., etc... It seems like everyone wants to prove how their side is less evil than the other side or show that their enemy is a hypocrite, bla bla bla. We all know that this is transparent propaganda and half of it is lies on both sides. The fact of the matter is that the middle east NEEDS some big fights like this to get all the nonsense out of their systems. Do you think the Americans hates Germany or Japan? No. Why? Because we got to duke it out a while back, shook hands and moved on. We didn't lob 10 bombs a year at civilians out of spite. Doing it like that gets nothing accomplished. A good butt-whipping is sometimes necessary to help you realign your perspective.

    "Everything I listed is intended to eliminate the tyranny of the majority." -Vincent Reynolds on American Democracy

    M L B 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • R Red Stateler

      The middle east is screwed up. Everybody knows that. Group A hates Groups B and C and vice versa, etc..., etc... It seems like everyone wants to prove how their side is less evil than the other side or show that their enemy is a hypocrite, bla bla bla. We all know that this is transparent propaganda and half of it is lies on both sides. The fact of the matter is that the middle east NEEDS some big fights like this to get all the nonsense out of their systems. Do you think the Americans hates Germany or Japan? No. Why? Because we got to duke it out a while back, shook hands and moved on. We didn't lob 10 bombs a year at civilians out of spite. Doing it like that gets nothing accomplished. A good butt-whipping is sometimes necessary to help you realign your perspective.

      "Everything I listed is intended to eliminate the tyranny of the majority." -Vincent Reynolds on American Democracy

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Marc Clifton
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      espeir wrote:

      A good butt-whipping is sometimes necessary to help you realign your perspective.

      So you're saying that they're all acting like children? ;P Marc

      XPressTier

      Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson
      People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
      There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Red Stateler

        The middle east is screwed up. Everybody knows that. Group A hates Groups B and C and vice versa, etc..., etc... It seems like everyone wants to prove how their side is less evil than the other side or show that their enemy is a hypocrite, bla bla bla. We all know that this is transparent propaganda and half of it is lies on both sides. The fact of the matter is that the middle east NEEDS some big fights like this to get all the nonsense out of their systems. Do you think the Americans hates Germany or Japan? No. Why? Because we got to duke it out a while back, shook hands and moved on. We didn't lob 10 bombs a year at civilians out of spite. Doing it like that gets nothing accomplished. A good butt-whipping is sometimes necessary to help you realign your perspective.

        "Everything I listed is intended to eliminate the tyranny of the majority." -Vincent Reynolds on American Democracy

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Espeir, You are right, the middle east is screwed up. Propaganda and lies just muddies the water. Solution : nowhere in sight, not even a glimmer. Points-of-view : many, varied, contradictory and ever more caustic. Can't see the wood through the trees so nothing achieved by butt-whipping.

        realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Espeir, You are right, the middle east is screwed up. Propaganda and lies just muddies the water. Solution : nowhere in sight, not even a glimmer. Points-of-view : many, varied, contradictory and ever more caustic. Can't see the wood through the trees so nothing achieved by butt-whipping.

          realJSOPR Offline
          realJSOPR Offline
          realJSOP
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          The solution is to turn the entire middle east into a glass parking lot...

          "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
          -----
          "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

          R L J V 4 Replies Last reply
          0
          • realJSOPR realJSOP

            The solution is to turn the entire middle east into a glass parking lot...

            "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
            -----
            "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

            R Offline
            R Offline
            R Giskard Reventlov
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            And how long before that happens?

            home
            bookmarks You can ignore relatives but the neighbours live next door

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • realJSOPR realJSOP

              The solution is to turn the entire middle east into a glass parking lot...

              "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
              -----
              "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              John, You can't be suggesting the use of "weapons of mass destruction" ? So I suppose that would mean the end of Israel, Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iraw, Iran, Syria, Palestine etc. But that would create new problems - industry dying through lack of oil which would give rise to the conditions enjoyed during earlier epoch that is displayed by so many Hollywood Sci-Fi films.

              R realJSOPR 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • realJSOPR realJSOP

                The solution is to turn the entire middle east into a glass parking lot...

                "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
                -----
                "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jerry Hammond
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Man, will that save on the cost of night lighting.

                "The key, the whole key, and nothing but the key, so help me Codd"

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  John, You can't be suggesting the use of "weapons of mass destruction" ? So I suppose that would mean the end of Israel, Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iraw, Iran, Syria, Palestine etc. But that would create new problems - industry dying through lack of oil which would give rise to the conditions enjoyed during earlier epoch that is displayed by so many Hollywood Sci-Fi films.

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Red Stateler
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                  But that would create new problems - industry dying through lack of oil which would give rise to the conditions enjoyed during earlier epoch that is displayed by so many Hollywood Sci-Fi films.

                  The oil fields aren't really in highly populated areas. We'd just nuke the cities. I think the oil would be OK.

                  "Everything I listed is intended to eliminate the tyranny of the majority." -Vincent Reynolds on American Democracy

                  -- modified at 10:26 Monday 24th July, 2006

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Red Stateler

                    Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                    But that would create new problems - industry dying through lack of oil which would give rise to the conditions enjoyed during earlier epoch that is displayed by so many Hollywood Sci-Fi films.

                    The oil fields aren't really in highly populated areas. We'd just nuke the cities. I think the oil would be OK.

                    "Everything I listed is intended to eliminate the tyranny of the majority." -Vincent Reynolds on American Democracy

                    -- modified at 10:26 Monday 24th July, 2006

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    As spoils of war ?

                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      As spoils of war ?

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Red Stateler
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Sure, why not? The US is the only country willing to put up the dough for a decent military (which everyone eventually leeches off). We suffer deficits and a weaker dollar as a result, which makes oil more expensive. I think we should be entitled to make their oil our own.

                      "Everything I listed is intended to eliminate the tyranny of the majority." -Vincent Reynolds on American Democracy

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Red Stateler

                        Sure, why not? The US is the only country willing to put up the dough for a decent military (which everyone eventually leeches off). We suffer deficits and a weaker dollar as a result, which makes oil more expensive. I think we should be entitled to make their oil our own.

                        "Everything I listed is intended to eliminate the tyranny of the majority." -Vincent Reynolds on American Democracy

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        <Being deliberately contentious> Reagon outspends Soviet Union on Military, almost causing USA bankruptcy giving rise to HUGE reductions in Federal spending elsewhere, USA citizens still paying price of that "investment".

                        espeir wrote:

                        put up the dough for a decent military

                        So you want more of the same.

                        espeir wrote:

                        makes oil more expensive

                        Oil more expensive means higher prices at factory gate means higher prices cumsumers to pay which will result in hyper-inflation as workers will want more money to cover higher costs of living that will inevitably lead to a downward spiral giving an financial depression that costs people their livelihood which in turn increases crime ...

                        espeir wrote:

                        I think we should be entitled to make their oil our own

                        What's yours is yours, what's somebody elses is also yours. </Being deliberately contentious> Are these things really what you want ?

                        R C 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          <Being deliberately contentious> Reagon outspends Soviet Union on Military, almost causing USA bankruptcy giving rise to HUGE reductions in Federal spending elsewhere, USA citizens still paying price of that "investment".

                          espeir wrote:

                          put up the dough for a decent military

                          So you want more of the same.

                          espeir wrote:

                          makes oil more expensive

                          Oil more expensive means higher prices at factory gate means higher prices cumsumers to pay which will result in hyper-inflation as workers will want more money to cover higher costs of living that will inevitably lead to a downward spiral giving an financial depression that costs people their livelihood which in turn increases crime ...

                          espeir wrote:

                          I think we should be entitled to make their oil our own

                          What's yours is yours, what's somebody elses is also yours. </Being deliberately contentious> Are these things really what you want ?

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Red Stateler
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                          Reagon outspends Soviet Union on Military, almost causing USA bankruptcy giving rise to HUGE reductions in Federal spending elsewhere, USA citizens still paying price of that "investment".

                          That didn't come close to causing the USA's bankruptcy. In fact our national debt is basically in line with most other countries when weighed against our GDP (this is the true measurement and why the US seems high). However, when you combine that with certain socialist policies (like the prescription drug plan and social security), our future obligations are exceeded which can certainly cause bankruptcy.

                          Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                          So you want more of the same.

                          Sure, it would be nice if Europe helped out every now and then. Sending a couple hundred troops here and there doesn't really cut it. They're leeching off of us.

                          Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                          Oil more expensive means higher prices at factory gate means higher prices cumsumers to pay which will result in hyper-inflation as workers will want more money to cover higher costs of living that will inevitably lead to a downward spiral giving an financial depression that costs people their livelihood which in turn increases crime ...

                          We've had expensive oil before (late 70s). It certainly isn't pretty. That's why we should just keep the oil in the Middle East.

                          Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                          What's yours is yours, what's somebody elses is also yours.

                          They're screwed up and don't deserve what they have. We're spending a lot to straighten out their own mess, so we deserve payback.

                          Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                          Are these things really what you want ?

                          Let's see. A lesser military obligation. Cheap oil. New beachfront real estate. Sure, why not?

                          "Everything I listed is intended to eliminate the tyranny of the majority." -Vincent Reynolds on American Democracy

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Red Stateler

                            Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                            Reagon outspends Soviet Union on Military, almost causing USA bankruptcy giving rise to HUGE reductions in Federal spending elsewhere, USA citizens still paying price of that "investment".

                            That didn't come close to causing the USA's bankruptcy. In fact our national debt is basically in line with most other countries when weighed against our GDP (this is the true measurement and why the US seems high). However, when you combine that with certain socialist policies (like the prescription drug plan and social security), our future obligations are exceeded which can certainly cause bankruptcy.

                            Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                            So you want more of the same.

                            Sure, it would be nice if Europe helped out every now and then. Sending a couple hundred troops here and there doesn't really cut it. They're leeching off of us.

                            Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                            Oil more expensive means higher prices at factory gate means higher prices cumsumers to pay which will result in hyper-inflation as workers will want more money to cover higher costs of living that will inevitably lead to a downward spiral giving an financial depression that costs people their livelihood which in turn increases crime ...

                            We've had expensive oil before (late 70s). It certainly isn't pretty. That's why we should just keep the oil in the Middle East.

                            Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                            What's yours is yours, what's somebody elses is also yours.

                            They're screwed up and don't deserve what they have. We're spending a lot to straighten out their own mess, so we deserve payback.

                            Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                            Are these things really what you want ?

                            Let's see. A lesser military obligation. Cheap oil. New beachfront real estate. Sure, why not?

                            "Everything I listed is intended to eliminate the tyranny of the majority." -Vincent Reynolds on American Democracy

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Looks like we are going to have to agree to disagree again.

                            R 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Looks like we are going to have to agree to disagree again.

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Red Stateler
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              I'm joking (mostly) in case you couldn't tell. I am serious when I say that the Middle East is in desperate need of a conclusionary (just made that word up) war to put an end to its constant barrage of mini-strifes.

                              "Everything I listed is intended to eliminate the tyranny of the majority." -Vincent Reynolds on American Democracy

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                John, You can't be suggesting the use of "weapons of mass destruction" ? So I suppose that would mean the end of Israel, Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iraw, Iran, Syria, Palestine etc. But that would create new problems - industry dying through lack of oil which would give rise to the conditions enjoyed during earlier epoch that is displayed by so many Hollywood Sci-Fi films.

                                realJSOPR Offline
                                realJSOPR Offline
                                realJSOP
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Yeah, yeah, blah blah - millions of people die - blah blah. Truth: Nobody's gonna miss a few million religious zealots fighting over an acre of sand. Silver lining: The news media can focus on other parts of the world, our presidents can find other much more entertaining (and interesting) ways to sabotage their own political careers, and we'd all be forced to find an alternative fuel because the entire middle east will be a wasteland for a billion years.

                                "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
                                -----
                                "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Red Stateler

                                  I'm joking (mostly) in case you couldn't tell. I am serious when I say that the Middle East is in desperate need of a conclusionary (just made that word up) war to put an end to its constant barrage of mini-strifes.

                                  "Everything I listed is intended to eliminate the tyranny of the majority." -Vincent Reynolds on American Democracy

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  You fooled me tooooooo easily :)

                                  espeir wrote:

                                  put an end to its constant barrage of mini-strifes

                                  Agree

                                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • realJSOPR realJSOP

                                    Yeah, yeah, blah blah - millions of people die - blah blah. Truth: Nobody's gonna miss a few million religious zealots fighting over an acre of sand. Silver lining: The news media can focus on other parts of the world, our presidents can find other much more entertaining (and interesting) ways to sabotage their own political careers, and we'd all be forced to find an alternative fuel because the entire middle east will be a wasteland for a billion years.

                                    "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
                                    -----
                                    "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                                    we'd all be forced to find an alternative fuel

                                    You might have to do that sooner rather than later if the doom-merchants of global warming are right, anyhow, isn't oil supposed to run out in the not too distant future?

                                    realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      You fooled me tooooooo easily :)

                                      espeir wrote:

                                      put an end to its constant barrage of mini-strifes

                                      Agree

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      jith iii
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                                      Agree

                                      Disagree

                                      R L 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J jith iii

                                        Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                                        Agree

                                        Disagree

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        Red Stateler
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Well, you guys have proven that you lack the capability to do it any other way.

                                        "Everything I listed is intended to eliminate the tyranny of the majority." -Vincent Reynolds on American Democracy

                                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R Red Stateler

                                          Well, you guys have proven that you lack the capability to do it any other way.

                                          "Everything I listed is intended to eliminate the tyranny of the majority." -Vincent Reynolds on American Democracy

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          jith iii
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Explanation needed:~

                                          realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups