A great image [modified]
-
http://www.rense.com/1.imagesG/bushtimemag.jpg[^] Not likely to happen, though:sigh: -- modified at 16:17 Thursday 3rd August, 2006
No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn. - Jim Morrison
dennisd45 wrote:
Not likely to happen, though
January 2009?
-- Broadcast simultaneously one year in the future
-
dennisd45 wrote:
Not likely to happen, though
January 2009?
-- Broadcast simultaneously one year in the future
-
http://www.rense.com/1.imagesG/bushtimemag.jpg[^] Not likely to happen, though:sigh: -- modified at 16:17 Thursday 3rd August, 2006
No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn. - Jim Morrison
dennisd45 wrote:
Not likely to happen, though
"To be great is to be misunderstood." - Ralph Waldo Emerson ;P
Jeremy Falcon
-
dennisd45 wrote:
Not likely to happen, though
"To be great is to be misunderstood." - Ralph Waldo Emerson ;P
Jeremy Falcon
It would seem that Emerson was (is?) eager to become great. ;P
-- Painstakingly Drawn Before a Live Audience
-
It would seem that Emerson was (is?) eager to become great. ;P
-- Painstakingly Drawn Before a Live Audience
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
is?
He's been pushing up daisies for quite some time now.
Jeremy Falcon
-
It would seem that Emerson was (is?) eager to become great. ;P
-- Painstakingly Drawn Before a Live Audience
Ah, I hit sumbit too soon. :laugh:
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
eager to become great.
Ain't it the truth. He wasn't exactly your average Joe, so to speak. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Waldo_Emerson[^]
Jeremy Falcon
-
dennisd45 wrote:
Not likely to happen, though
"To be great is to be misunderstood." - Ralph Waldo Emerson ;P
Jeremy Falcon
In order for Emerson's statement to apply to Bush, it would need to be symmetrical, and it's not. To be misunderstood is not necessarily to be great.
-
In order for Emerson's statement to apply to Bush, it would need to be symmetrical, and it's not. To be misunderstood is not necessarily to be great.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
In order for Emerson's statement to apply to Bush, it would need to be symmetrical, and it's not.
In your attempt to insult Bush, you forgot to realize it was a joke.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
To be misunderstood is not necessarily to be great.
Yes, but by the same token, it can be. Which means there exists the chance he is great and we just don't understand him. So, logically speaking, you cannot assume he's not.
Jeremy Falcon
-
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
In order for Emerson's statement to apply to Bush, it would need to be symmetrical, and it's not.
In your attempt to insult Bush, you forgot to realize it was a joke.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
To be misunderstood is not necessarily to be great.
Yes, but by the same token, it can be. Which means there exists the chance he is great and we just don't understand him. So, logically speaking, you cannot assume he's not.
Jeremy Falcon
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
In your attempt to insult Bush, you forgot to realize it was a joke.
In your attempt to take my insult seriously, you forgot to realize it was a joke, as well as an insult.
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
Yes, but by the same token, it can be. Which means there exists the chance he is great and we just don't understand him. So, logically speaking, you cannot assume he's not.
True, taken alone, the misunderstanding might indicate greatness, just like the misunderestimating indicated...well, actually, that -- as well as the metric buttload of hilarity that has happened since -- seem to indicate just the opposite. Let's try some measures of greatness:
- Great statesman? Not even with an earpiece and a puppetmaster.
- Great leader? Not by the polls. Any polls.
- Great dignity? "Yo, Blair."
- Great backrubs? Germany says, "nein!"
- Great wit? "I thought you were gonna ask me about the pig. Heh, heh."
- Great guy? Seems like he might be a decent guy to have a beer with. If he still drank. Which he doesn't. Right.
- Great President? Your friends say yes. Mine? Eh...not so much. We'll see what history says.
BTW, it isn't a partisan thing. I disagreed rather strongly with Reagan's politics, but still think he at least had elements of greatness. Or maybe Bush has just lowered the bar...
-
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
In your attempt to insult Bush, you forgot to realize it was a joke.
In your attempt to take my insult seriously, you forgot to realize it was a joke, as well as an insult.
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
Yes, but by the same token, it can be. Which means there exists the chance he is great and we just don't understand him. So, logically speaking, you cannot assume he's not.
True, taken alone, the misunderstanding might indicate greatness, just like the misunderestimating indicated...well, actually, that -- as well as the metric buttload of hilarity that has happened since -- seem to indicate just the opposite. Let's try some measures of greatness:
- Great statesman? Not even with an earpiece and a puppetmaster.
- Great leader? Not by the polls. Any polls.
- Great dignity? "Yo, Blair."
- Great backrubs? Germany says, "nein!"
- Great wit? "I thought you were gonna ask me about the pig. Heh, heh."
- Great guy? Seems like he might be a decent guy to have a beer with. If he still drank. Which he doesn't. Right.
- Great President? Your friends say yes. Mine? Eh...not so much. We'll see what history says.
BTW, it isn't a partisan thing. I disagreed rather strongly with Reagan's politics, but still think he at least had elements of greatness. Or maybe Bush has just lowered the bar...
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
In your attempt to take my insult seriously, you forgot to realize it was a joke, as well as an insult.
In your attempt to insult my joke regarding your insulting joke regarding my joke, you forgot to take into consideration that your insulting joke regarding my joke wasn't terribly funny.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
True, taken alone, the misunderstanding might indicate greatness, just like the misunderestimating indicated...
I didn't misunderstand the qoute at all. ;P
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
Great President? Your friends say yes. Mine? Eh...not so much. We'll see what history says.
It'll say whatever we want it to say, because we'll off the fuckers that write anything we don't like. :rolleyes:
Jeremy Falcon
-
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
In your attempt to take my insult seriously, you forgot to realize it was a joke, as well as an insult.
In your attempt to insult my joke regarding your insulting joke regarding my joke, you forgot to take into consideration that your insulting joke regarding my joke wasn't terribly funny.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
True, taken alone, the misunderstanding might indicate greatness, just like the misunderestimating indicated...
I didn't misunderstand the qoute at all. ;P
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
Great President? Your friends say yes. Mine? Eh...not so much. We'll see what history says.
It'll say whatever we want it to say, because we'll off the fuckers that write anything we don't like. :rolleyes:
Jeremy Falcon
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
In your attempt to insult my joke regarding your insulting joke regarding my joke, you forgot to take into consideration that your insulting joke regarding my joke wasn't terribly funny.
I find your attempt to claim that my response to your response regarding my insulting joke regarding your Emerson quote wasn't funny amusing.
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
I didn't misunderstand the qoute at all.
No, I think you misunderestimated it instead.
-
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
In your attempt to insult my joke regarding your insulting joke regarding my joke, you forgot to take into consideration that your insulting joke regarding my joke wasn't terribly funny.
I find your attempt to claim that my response to your response regarding my insulting joke regarding your Emerson quote wasn't funny amusing.
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
I didn't misunderstand the qoute at all.
No, I think you misunderestimated it instead.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
I find your attempt to claim that my response to your response regarding my insulting joke regarding your Emerson quote wasn't funny amusing.
That is profound.
This post is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.
-
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
In your attempt to insult my joke regarding your insulting joke regarding my joke, you forgot to take into consideration that your insulting joke regarding my joke wasn't terribly funny.
I find your attempt to claim that my response to your response regarding my insulting joke regarding your Emerson quote wasn't funny amusing.
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
I didn't misunderstand the qoute at all.
No, I think you misunderestimated it instead.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
I find your attempt to claim that my response to your response regarding my insulting joke regarding your Emerson quote wasn't funny amusing.
Yeah, it helps to have a sense of humor.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
No, I think you misunderestimated it instead.
I'm happy to inform that you thought wrong. Please do pull the cork out and take a good whiff. ;) Also, you apparently forgot it was a joke. There's is no over/under estimation with jokes. For further reading, may I suggest this[^].
Jeremy Falcon
-
http://www.rense.com/1.imagesG/bushtimemag.jpg[^] Not likely to happen, though:sigh: -- modified at 16:17 Thursday 3rd August, 2006
No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn. - Jim Morrison
-
-
-
http://www.rense.com/1.imagesG/bushtimemag.jpg[^] Not likely to happen, though:sigh: -- modified at 16:17 Thursday 3rd August, 2006
No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn. - Jim Morrison
-
What a waste of human suffering it would be if bush resigned now. There is still much more harm he is called to do before 2008.
-
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
I find your attempt to claim that my response to your response regarding my insulting joke regarding your Emerson quote wasn't funny amusing.
Yeah, it helps to have a sense of humor.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
No, I think you misunderestimated it instead.
I'm happy to inform that you thought wrong. Please do pull the cork out and take a good whiff. ;) Also, you apparently forgot it was a joke. There's is no over/under estimation with jokes. For further reading, may I suggest this[^].
Jeremy Falcon
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
Yeah, it helps to have a sense of humor.
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
There's is no over/under estimation with jokes.
For further reading, may I suggest you google "bush" and "misunderestimate". You probably won't find the resulting pages funny; but, trust me, pretty much everyone else does.
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
For further reading, may I suggest this[^].
Good call. That web site is hilarious. I laughed until I stopped.
-
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
Yeah, it helps to have a sense of humor.
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
There's is no over/under estimation with jokes.
For further reading, may I suggest you google "bush" and "misunderestimate". You probably won't find the resulting pages funny; but, trust me, pretty much everyone else does.
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
For further reading, may I suggest this[^].
Good call. That web site is hilarious. I laughed until I stopped.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
For further reading, may I suggest you google "bush" and "misunderestimate". You probably won't find the resulting pages funny; but, trust me, pretty much everyone else does.
Crap I missed that one. :laugh:
Jeremy Falcon
