Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. NT Security

NT Security

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
security
3 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    Bram van Kampen
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    It appears that the NT Security protocol is designed to allow or deny access to files in directories, depending on the security clearance of the human user. I have an application, where access would have to be be decided on, not only by human user identity, but also by means of the identity of the application used to access the data. ( e.g. a User must be stopped from opening a file via NotePad, but, may have access through a Bespoke Application) For instance, Banking Software would have to contain a lot of this. Does Anyone have any Idea or observations about this regards

    LateNightsInNewry

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B Bram van Kampen

      It appears that the NT Security protocol is designed to allow or deny access to files in directories, depending on the security clearance of the human user. I have an application, where access would have to be be decided on, not only by human user identity, but also by means of the identity of the application used to access the data. ( e.g. a User must be stopped from opening a file via NotePad, but, may have access through a Bespoke Application) For instance, Banking Software would have to contain a lot of this. Does Anyone have any Idea or observations about this regards

      LateNightsInNewry

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Justin Tay
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Raymond blogged about this just last week. http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2006/08/18/705957.aspx[^]

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Justin Tay

        Raymond blogged about this just last week. http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2006/08/18/705957.aspx[^]

        B Offline
        B Offline
        Bram van Kampen
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I'm printing this just off now, but scanning it I got the gist. It appears to be an obvious requirement that Bill gates never thought about! he seems to be pre-occupied with someone getting access to someone else's ascii file, or something that those like CIA could read from a disk they recovered. About that,I can assure everybody that Bill has been quite successfull, in that a known local forger in my local area was set free from proceedings in such matters as providing forged passports, solely, because after two years GCHQ ( The UK Gouvernments Central Code Breaking Institute)in the UK failed to decript the man's hard disk, and the courts ran out of patience. The good news out of this is, that Encryption doe seem to work! The bad news is, it only seems to work in Microsoft ways!

        LateNightsInNewry

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups