Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. Getting the Combo Box selected item using Win32 API.

Getting the Combo Box selected item using Win32 API.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
questionjsonhelp
21 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P prasad_som

    WhiteSky wrote:

    And he needs to a convert atoi

    Why ?

    Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]

    H Offline
    H Offline
    Hamid Taebi
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    If he wants to use of numeric values


    WhiteSky


    S P 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • H Hamid Taebi

      If he wants to use of numeric values


      WhiteSky


      S Offline
      S Offline
      Suresh H
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      Thanks WhiteSky for the Response, yr info is also very use full for me. I will keep a note of that.

      H 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H Hamid Taebi

        If he wants to use of numeric values


        WhiteSky


        P Offline
        P Offline
        prasad_som
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        Ok, you was refering to extracting numbers.

        Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]

        H 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Suresh H

          Thanks Prasad Code is working. Thanks for taking some time for me and helping me. In yr code 1st line was enough for me int nIndx =::SendMessage(hCombo,CB_GETCURSEL,0,0); since in the combo box I have values from 0,1,2,3,4,5 and so on … so as I get the Index number value will be the same as the CB content. I did not know about the CB index. Thank you very much.:)

          P Offline
          P Offline
          prasad_som
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          Suresh H wrote:

          since in the combo box I have values from 0,1,2,3,4,5 and so on … so as I get the Index number value will be the same as the CB content.

          Seems very strange logic. But, use CB_GETLBTEXT message, as it will not be the case always.

          Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P prasad_som

            Ok, you was refering to extracting numbers.

            Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]

            H Offline
            H Offline
            Hamid Taebi
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            And also one other thing if he wants to use CB_GETCURSEL(return values) for works on his programs(not for combobox)its not good idea because it returns -1,0,1,...but if he has values like 100,200,300 on his combobox... return values of CB_GETCURSEL not helpfuls ;)


            WhiteSky


            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P prasad_som

              Suresh H wrote:

              since in the combo box I have values from 0,1,2,3,4,5 and so on … so as I get the Index number value will be the same as the CB content.

              Seems very strange logic. But, use CB_GETLBTEXT message, as it will not be the case always.

              Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Suresh H
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Yes Prasad I will make use of it.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Suresh H

                Thanks WhiteSky for the Response, yr info is also very use full for me. I will keep a note of that.

                H Offline
                H Offline
                Hamid Taebi
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                Thank you ;)


                WhiteSky


                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • H Hamid Taebi

                  And also one other thing if he wants to use CB_GETCURSEL(return values) for works on his programs(not for combobox)its not good idea because it returns -1,0,1,...but if he has values like 100,200,300 on his combobox... return values of CB_GETCURSEL not helpfuls ;)


                  WhiteSky


                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  prasad_som
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  WhiteSky wrote:

                  CB_GETCURSEL(return values) for works on his programs(not for combobox)

                  :confused:

                  WhiteSky wrote:

                  its not good idea because it returns -1,0,1,...but if he has values like 100,200,300 on his combobox... return values of CB_GETCURSEL not helpfuls

                  I'm really not getting , what you are trying to say?

                  Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]

                  H 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P prasad_som

                    WhiteSky wrote:

                    CB_GETCURSEL(return values) for works on his programs(not for combobox)

                    :confused:

                    WhiteSky wrote:

                    its not good idea because it returns -1,0,1,...but if he has values like 100,200,300 on his combobox... return values of CB_GETCURSEL not helpfuls

                    I'm really not getting , what you are trying to say?

                    Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]

                    H Offline
                    H Offline
                    Hamid Taebi
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    I said its better he uses of value on combobox ;)


                    WhiteSky


                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • H Hamid Taebi

                      I said its better he uses of value on combobox ;)


                      WhiteSky


                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      prasad_som
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      Haven't you seen this[^]?

                      Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P prasad_som

                        This code should suffice,

                        int nIndx =::SendMessage(hCombo,CB_GETCURSEL,0,0);
                        TCHAR buff[100];
                        ::SendMessage(h,CB_GETLBTEXT,(WPARAM)nIndx,(LPARAM)buff);
                        //buff will contain text returned

                        Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        jhwurmbach
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        For CB_GETLBTEXT, MSDn says: lParam Pointer to the buffer that receives the string. The buffer must have sufficient space for the string and a terminating null character. With your 100 TCHARS you might or might not be ok. MSDN gives the solution in the next sentence: You can send a CB_GETLBTEXTLEN message prior to the CB_GETLBTEXT message to retrieve the length, in TCHARs, of the string. So, the code-snippet would better be:

                        int nIndx =::SendMessage(hCombo,CB_GETCURSEL,0,0);
                        const LRESULT nSize = ::SendMessage(hCombo, CB_GETLBTEXTLEN, (WPARAM)nIndx, 0);
                        TCHAR buff[nSize+1];
                        ::SendMessage(h,CB_GETLBTEXT,(WPARAM)nIndx,(LPARAM)buff);
                        //buff will contain text returned


                        "We trained hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganised. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising: and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress, while producing confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation." -- Caius Petronius, Roman Consul, 66 A.D.

                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J jhwurmbach

                          For CB_GETLBTEXT, MSDn says: lParam Pointer to the buffer that receives the string. The buffer must have sufficient space for the string and a terminating null character. With your 100 TCHARS you might or might not be ok. MSDN gives the solution in the next sentence: You can send a CB_GETLBTEXTLEN message prior to the CB_GETLBTEXT message to retrieve the length, in TCHARs, of the string. So, the code-snippet would better be:

                          int nIndx =::SendMessage(hCombo,CB_GETCURSEL,0,0);
                          const LRESULT nSize = ::SendMessage(hCombo, CB_GETLBTEXTLEN, (WPARAM)nIndx, 0);
                          TCHAR buff[nSize+1];
                          ::SendMessage(h,CB_GETLBTEXT,(WPARAM)nIndx,(LPARAM)buff);
                          //buff will contain text returned


                          "We trained hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganised. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising: and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress, while producing confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation." -- Caius Petronius, Roman Consul, 66 A.D.

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          prasad_som
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          jhwurmbach wrote:

                          lParam Pointer to the buffer that receives the string. The buffer must have sufficient space for the string and a terminating null character. With your 100 TCHARS you might or might not be ok.

                          True, It is just a quick fix.

                          jhwurmbach wrote:

                          TCHAR buff[nSize+1];::SendMessage(h,CB_GETLBTEXT,(WPARAM)nIndx,(LPARAM)buff);//buff will contain text returned

                          Again, small correction here, need to allocate memory on heap.

                           TCHAR \*buff = new TCHAR\[nIndx+1\];
                          ::SendMessage(hCombo,CB\_GETLBTEXT,(WPARAM)0,(LPARAM)buff);
                          //use delete \[\] buff; after use
                          

                          Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]

                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P prasad_som

                            jhwurmbach wrote:

                            lParam Pointer to the buffer that receives the string. The buffer must have sufficient space for the string and a terminating null character. With your 100 TCHARS you might or might not be ok.

                            True, It is just a quick fix.

                            jhwurmbach wrote:

                            TCHAR buff[nSize+1];::SendMessage(h,CB_GETLBTEXT,(WPARAM)nIndx,(LPARAM)buff);//buff will contain text returned

                            Again, small correction here, need to allocate memory on heap.

                             TCHAR \*buff = new TCHAR\[nIndx+1\];
                            ::SendMessage(hCombo,CB\_GETLBTEXT,(WPARAM)0,(LPARAM)buff);
                            //use delete \[\] buff; after use
                            

                            Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            jhwurmbach
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            prasad_som wrote:

                            Again, small correction here,

                            In the end it doesn't pay to cut short on testing... :-O Thanks!


                            "We trained hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganised. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising: and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress, while producing confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation." -- Caius Petronius, Roman Consul, 66 A.D.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups