Anti Virus - and the winner is?
-
We all use anti virus software, especially those who value their data and tools. And also everybody has their own opinion on which anti virus software is the best. Google-ing it is pointless, as most surveys give totally different opinions on the so called "Top" anti virus software. I wanted to know you guys, which do you use and why?
I use Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition v10.1.0.401, I love it mainly cause i know it works well and cause it really, really low on my computer's resources and in combination to that, windows firewall, regular updates and Firefox, i need no other protection.Ericos Georgiades
ad3z wrote:
I use Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition v10.1.0.401
I'm surprised you would mention that. I expected some free junk or something. It is the absolute best and I will never use anything else. I also have the corporate firewall. The best thing is that its not subscription based so I get free updates for life.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
ad3z wrote:
I use Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition v10.1.0.401
I'm surprised you would mention that. I expected some free junk or something. It is the absolute best and I will never use anything else. I also have the corporate firewall. The best thing is that its not subscription based so I get free updates for life.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Captain See Sharp wrote:
The best thing is that its not subscription based so I get free updates for life.
I totally agree, something i should have mentioned. And many people comment on "hourly" updates and how superior anti virus software are because of such features. Personally I trust Symantec's anti virus definitions above any others, even if i receive them on something less than a daily basis, which is frequent enough.
Ericos Georgiades
-
Captain See Sharp wrote:
The best thing is that its not subscription based so I get free updates for life.
I totally agree, something i should have mentioned. And many people comment on "hourly" updates and how superior anti virus software are because of such features. Personally I trust Symantec's anti virus definitions above any others, even if i receive them on something less than a daily basis, which is frequent enough.
Ericos Georgiades
ad3z wrote:
Personally I trust Symantec's anti virus definitions above any others, even if i receive them on something less than a daily basis, which is frequent enough.
Yeah, I have put Symantec's corporate anti-virus and firewall to the test on many occasions and it has always prevailed. Its a shame they wont deliver the same quality for the average user.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
ad3z wrote:
Personally I trust Symantec's anti virus definitions above any others, even if i receive them on something less than a daily basis, which is frequent enough.
Yeah, I have put Symantec's corporate anti-virus and firewall to the test on many occasions and it has always prevailed. Its a shame they wont deliver the same quality for the average user.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Captain See Sharp wrote:
Its a shame they wont deliver the same quality for the average user.
Otherwise Known As : Norton And yet Symantec's most popular software is Norton, which in my opinion, is the one of the worst anti viruses out there. (mostly due to it's amazing ability to chew on a computer's resources) In the case of Norton, I think my system could run better infected.
Ericos Georgiades
-
Captain See Sharp wrote:
Its a shame they wont deliver the same quality for the average user.
Otherwise Known As : Norton And yet Symantec's most popular software is Norton, which in my opinion, is the one of the worst anti viruses out there. (mostly due to it's amazing ability to chew on a computer's resources) In the case of Norton, I think my system could run better infected.
Ericos Georgiades
ad3z wrote:
In the case of Norton, I think my system could run better infected.
With Norton your system is infected. I have worked on many computers and the ones that had Norton or some other junk anti-malware software were painfully slow and I was constantly getting bombarded with update notices and I really hate the toolbars and floating junk that gets put on the side of the screen on some versions. You even need a special tool to completely remove Norton.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
ad3z wrote:
In the case of Norton, I think my system could run better infected.
With Norton your system is infected. I have worked on many computers and the ones that had Norton or some other junk anti-malware software were painfully slow and I was constantly getting bombarded with update notices and I really hate the toolbars and floating junk that gets put on the side of the screen on some versions. You even need a special tool to completely remove Norton.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Captain See Sharp wrote:
You even need a special tool to completely remove Norton.
And just imagine : I've managed to uninstall known viruses.
Ericos Georgiades
-
We all use anti virus software, especially those who value their data and tools. And also everybody has their own opinion on which anti virus software is the best. Google-ing it is pointless, as most surveys give totally different opinions on the so called "Top" anti virus software. I wanted to know you guys, which do you use and why?
I use Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition v10.1.0.401, I love it mainly cause i know it works well and cause it really, really low on my computer's resources and in combination to that, windows firewall, regular updates and Firefox, i need no other protection.Ericos Georgiades
-
-
I second that.
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread Fold with us! ¤ flickr
Thirded.
the last thing I want to see is some pasty-faced geek with skin so pale that it's almost translucent trying to bump parts with a partner - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before. -
I use AVG free, and will continue to do so, even if my home computer right now has got the m_hook/Bagle.GE Trojan/Rootkit. :( :mad: X| So I'm not too confident on AVG right now, but anyway, it runs smoothly and, well, is free...
Alcohol. The cause of, and the solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson
-
We all use anti virus software, especially those who value their data and tools. And also everybody has their own opinion on which anti virus software is the best. Google-ing it is pointless, as most surveys give totally different opinions on the so called "Top" anti virus software. I wanted to know you guys, which do you use and why?
I use Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition v10.1.0.401, I love it mainly cause i know it works well and cause it really, really low on my computer's resources and in combination to that, windows firewall, regular updates and Firefox, i need no other protection.Ericos Georgiades
I don't use AV software.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
I use AVG free, and will continue to do so, even if my home computer right now has got the m_hook/Bagle.GE Trojan/Rootkit. :( :mad: X| So I'm not too confident on AVG right now, but anyway, it runs smoothly and, well, is free...
Alcohol. The cause of, and the solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson
kakan wrote:
it runs smoothly
I have tried it (AVG), and maybe I'm paranoid when it comes to my computers resources but, AVG delays startup and consumes continuously, much like NOD32, it's active engine is really active.
kakan wrote:
and, well, is free...
Price is definitely an issue, as free software is always used first. But honestly, and in a company environment, it's a small price to pay to protect data and equipment.
Ericos Georgiades
-
I don't use AV software.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001Could I please have your IP address and current OS and service pack? I'll get the rest myself. :)
Ericos Georgiades
-
Could I please have your IP address and current OS and service pack? I'll get the rest myself. :)
Ericos Georgiades
ad3z wrote:
Could I please have your IP address and current OS and service pack?
XP SP2, 192.168.1.1 Have fun! ;P
"I hope he can see this, because I'm doing it as hard as I can" - Ignignot
-
Could I please have your IP address and current OS and service pack? I'll get the rest myself. :)
Ericos Georgiades
127.0.0.1
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
127.0.0.1
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
127.0.0.1
I have proven (at least) I cannot penetrate myself.
Ericos Georgiades
-
Could I please have your IP address and current OS and service pack? I'll get the rest myself. :)
Ericos Georgiades
If you really want to try, I'll reformat my laptop and put WinXP with SP2 and all the latest updates, and you can try to get in, but I seriously doubt you will be able to reach/breach the system.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
127.0.0.1
I have proven (at least) I cannot penetrate myself.
Ericos Georgiades
I was just about to suggest that you penetrate yourself...
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
Could I please have your IP address and current OS and service pack? I'll get the rest myself. :)
Ericos Georgiades
I don't use AV software either. I figure that if it is this damned hard for me to get out past the firewalls then good luck to the poor sod trying to get in.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk -
If you really want to try, I'll reformat my laptop and put WinXP with SP2 and all the latest updates, and you can try to get in, but I seriously doubt you will be able to reach/breach the system.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
If you really want to try
If I had the time, I'd love to try. Use SP1 or no service pack at all, and i'll consider it :D
Ericos Georgiades
