In Which Ilíon Apologizes
-
Why do you think you need to be the focal point of those around you? Were you, perhaps, once somebody's "focal point" in the past? Has this lost "relationship" left you feeling excessively alone. Are you now trying to fill the void caused by this abandoned "relationship" with the attention of strangers? Tell me about your uncle.
He's avoiding talking about his uncle. There must be some "painful" memories there... He should find his "happy place".
-
I was wrong; terribly and horribly wrong. And I am so sorry. I had said:
Ilíon wrote:
The Code Project discussion boards - The Soapbox - off-topic rants If you want to get something off your chest then do it here - but enter at your own risk.*
Rules: Do not post anything illegal, offensive*, abuse* or that constitutes harassment*.
*[Your Milage May Vary]
Quite obviously, this was not exactly correct. Some persons think this forum is not the SoapBox, but is rather the SANDBOX.
'Dhimmitude' is a state of mind.
http://www.blog.com[^] Take out your grievances there.
[Frozen Thoughts] | [My Life - My Prayer]
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero ப்ரம்மா -
He's avoiding talking about his uncle. There must be some "painful" memories there... He should find his "happy place".
The Apocalyptic Teacup wrote:
He's avoiding talking about his uncle.
I've also noticed that my posts asking about his uncle suddenly got one votes from somebody with a low-weighting. Is that another way at lashing out at his uncle by lashing out at those from whom he craves attention and loathes...his "surrogate uncles", if you will?
-
The Apocalyptic Teacup wrote:
He's avoiding talking about his uncle.
I've also noticed that my posts asking about his uncle suddenly got one votes from somebody with a low-weighting. Is that another way at lashing out at his uncle by lashing out at those from whom he craves attention and loathes...his "surrogate uncles", if you will?
Red Stateler wrote:
I've also noticed that my posts asking about his uncle suddenly got one votes from somebody with a low-weighting. Is that another way at lashing out at his uncle by lashing out at those from whom he both loathes and craves attention...his "surrogate uncles", if you will?
He does that. When he's threatened he lashes out with '1' votes. That's how you know you're getting too personal with him. Notice how he avoids the topic and has suddenly stopped posting spamming.
-
Red Stateler wrote:
I've also noticed that my posts asking about his uncle suddenly got one votes from somebody with a low-weighting. Is that another way at lashing out at his uncle by lashing out at those from whom he both loathes and craves attention...his "surrogate uncles", if you will?
He does that. When he's threatened he lashes out with '1' votes. That's how you know you're getting too personal with him. Notice how he avoids the topic and has suddenly stopped posting spamming.
The Apocalyptic Teacup wrote:
He does that. When he's threatened he lashes out with '1' votes.
I suspect that he adopts passive-aggressive behavior because when he was a child, he was helpless against his uncle. That was his only effective method of vengeance then, so he exhibits that learned behavior now.
-
The Apocalyptic Teacup wrote:
He does that. When he's threatened he lashes out with '1' votes.
I suspect that he adopts passive-aggressive behavior because when he was a child, he was helpless against his uncle. That was his only effective method of vengeance then, so he exhibits that learned behavior now.
Red Stateler wrote:
I suspect that he adopts passive-aggressive behavior because when he was a child, he was helpless against his uncle. That was his only effective method of vengeance then, so he exhibits that learned behavior now.
I have to agree. The picture is becoming quite clear. He also seems to want to re-enact that event. He insists on calling us "Soapbox Tots", which is a reference to little children. The same little children that he wants to treat the way his uncle treated him.
-
Red Stateler wrote:
I've also noticed that my posts asking about his uncle suddenly got one votes from somebody with a low-weighting. Is that another way at lashing out at his uncle by lashing out at those from whom he both loathes and craves attention...his "surrogate uncles", if you will?
He does that. When he's threatened he lashes out with '1' votes. That's how you know you're getting too personal with him. Notice how he avoids the topic and has suddenly stopped posting spamming.
The Apocalyptic Teacup wrote:
He does that. When he's threatened he lashes out with '1' votes.
Yes :omg:
[Frozen Thoughts] | [My Life - My Prayer]
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero ப்ரம்மா -
Red Stateler wrote:
I suspect that he adopts passive-aggressive behavior because when he was a child, he was helpless against his uncle. That was his only effective method of vengeance then, so he exhibits that learned behavior now.
I have to agree. The picture is becoming quite clear. He also seems to want to re-enact that event. He insists on calling us "Soapbox Tots", which is a reference to little children. The same little children that he wants to treat the way his uncle treated him.
The Apocalyptic Teacup wrote:
I have to agree. The picture is becoming quite clear. He also seems to want to re-enact that event. He insists on calling us "Soapbox Tots", which is a reference to little children. The same little children that he wants to treat the way his uncle treated him.
Hmmmmmmm....Interesting. Do you think that perhaps, to him, a "tot" is actually a figurative mental construct of a less-than-fully-developed male reproductive organ? Perhaps his? The one his uncle enjoyed? Do you think that is why he is obsessed with calling others "children" and "tots"?
-
The Apocalyptic Teacup wrote:
I have to agree. The picture is becoming quite clear. He also seems to want to re-enact that event. He insists on calling us "Soapbox Tots", which is a reference to little children. The same little children that he wants to treat the way his uncle treated him.
Hmmmmmmm....Interesting. Do you think that perhaps, to him, a "tot" is actually a figurative mental construct of a less-than-fully-developed male reproductive organ? Perhaps his? The one his uncle enjoyed? Do you think that is why he is obsessed with calling others "children" and "tots"?
Red Stateler wrote:
Hmmmmmmm....Interesting. Do you think that perhaps, to him, a "tot" is actually a figurative mental construct of a less-than-fully-developed male reproductive organ? Perhaps his? The one his uncle enjoyed? Do you think that is why he is obsessed with calling other "children" and "tots"?
Could be, could be. I noticed below he claims that he took a psychology class where he learned about certain types of individuals. Individuals he cannot discuss. He also uses the only instance of the "sick-faced" smiley. Could it be that he finds himself repulsive after learing about what society thinks of people like him? Could all of this have it's origin in his "tot"? These questions are demanding answers. Perhaps he should address them before we elect to contact the relevant authorities.
-
Red Stateler wrote:
Hmmmmmmm....Interesting. Do you think that perhaps, to him, a "tot" is actually a figurative mental construct of a less-than-fully-developed male reproductive organ? Perhaps his? The one his uncle enjoyed? Do you think that is why he is obsessed with calling other "children" and "tots"?
Could be, could be. I noticed below he claims that he took a psychology class where he learned about certain types of individuals. Individuals he cannot discuss. He also uses the only instance of the "sick-faced" smiley. Could it be that he finds himself repulsive after learing about what society thinks of people like him? Could all of this have it's origin in his "tot"? These questions are demanding answers. Perhaps he should address them before we elect to contact the relevant authorities.
I think he's destroying the fabric of the SB... you and Red teaming up and all. Its just not right.
-
The Apocalyptic Teacup wrote:
I have to agree. The picture is becoming quite clear. He also seems to want to re-enact that event. He insists on calling us "Soapbox Tots", which is a reference to little children. The same little children that he wants to treat the way his uncle treated him.
Hmmmmmmm....Interesting. Do you think that perhaps, to him, a "tot" is actually a figurative mental construct of a less-than-fully-developed male reproductive organ? Perhaps his? The one his uncle enjoyed? Do you think that is why he is obsessed with calling others "children" and "tots"?
-
I think he's destroying the fabric of the SB... you and Red teaming up and all. Its just not right.
eggsovereasy wrote:
I think he's destroying the fabric of the SB... you and Red teaming up and all. Its just not right.
We're just trying to help. He *needs* help...
-
There might be something in Erik Erikson's theories of psychosocial development in terms of stages 6 and 7 where difficulties and failures manifest to a feeling that life has no meaning.
If we can keep him talking, perhaps we can get to the "bottom" of it and get him the appropriate help.
-
I was wrong; terribly and horribly wrong. And I am so sorry. I had said:
Ilíon wrote:
The Code Project discussion boards - The Soapbox - off-topic rants If you want to get something off your chest then do it here - but enter at your own risk.*
Rules: Do not post anything illegal, offensive*, abuse* or that constitutes harassment*.
*[Your Milage May Vary]
Quite obviously, this was not exactly correct. Some persons think this forum is not the SoapBox, but is rather the SANDBOX.
'Dhimmitude' is a state of mind.
-
If we can keep him talking, perhaps we can get to the "bottom" of it and get him the appropriate help.
The Apocalyptic Teacup wrote:
perhaps we can get to the "bottom" of it and get him the appropriate help
Please don't talk about his "bottom". I think there is a lot of pain (mostly physical) associated with that word.