Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. II: Reconsidering Some Atheistic Arguments

II: Reconsidering Some Atheistic Arguments

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
4 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Offline
    I Offline
    Ilion
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Not all internet 'atheists' are like the local Sandbox Tots. Consider the following post at the Internet Infidels* site: Reconsidering Some Atheistic Arguments [^] Mind you, so far as I know, I have never personally encountered an internet atheist trying to be reasonable as Mr Lazarus at II was doing. But I'm sure there must be a few more, somewhere in this wide world. Please, read his post. Then, read the "responses" from his fellow atheists. I was tempted to join II just so I could give Mr Lazarus a word of encouragement. * aka II (aka, Invincible Ignorance)

    'Dhimmitude' is a state of mind.

    7 U R 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • I Ilion

      Not all internet 'atheists' are like the local Sandbox Tots. Consider the following post at the Internet Infidels* site: Reconsidering Some Atheistic Arguments [^] Mind you, so far as I know, I have never personally encountered an internet atheist trying to be reasonable as Mr Lazarus at II was doing. But I'm sure there must be a few more, somewhere in this wide world. Please, read his post. Then, read the "responses" from his fellow atheists. I was tempted to join II just so I could give Mr Lazarus a word of encouragement. * aka II (aka, Invincible Ignorance)

      'Dhimmitude' is a state of mind.

      7 Offline
      7 Offline
      73Zeppelin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Ilíon wrote:

      local Sandbox Tots.

      Oh, you hang out at the local park to observe the children! Does that give you pleasure?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I Ilion

        Not all internet 'atheists' are like the local Sandbox Tots. Consider the following post at the Internet Infidels* site: Reconsidering Some Atheistic Arguments [^] Mind you, so far as I know, I have never personally encountered an internet atheist trying to be reasonable as Mr Lazarus at II was doing. But I'm sure there must be a few more, somewhere in this wide world. Please, read his post. Then, read the "responses" from his fellow atheists. I was tempted to join II just so I could give Mr Lazarus a word of encouragement. * aka II (aka, Invincible Ignorance)

        'Dhimmitude' is a state of mind.

        U Offline
        U Offline
        Unregistered User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        http://www.ebaumsworld.com/forumfun/positive14.jpg

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Ilion

          Not all internet 'atheists' are like the local Sandbox Tots. Consider the following post at the Internet Infidels* site: Reconsidering Some Atheistic Arguments [^] Mind you, so far as I know, I have never personally encountered an internet atheist trying to be reasonable as Mr Lazarus at II was doing. But I'm sure there must be a few more, somewhere in this wide world. Please, read his post. Then, read the "responses" from his fellow atheists. I was tempted to join II just so I could give Mr Lazarus a word of encouragement. * aka II (aka, Invincible Ignorance)

          'Dhimmitude' is a state of mind.

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Red Stateler
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Ilíon wrote:

          Mind you, so far as I know, I have never personally encountered an internet atheist trying to be reasonable as Mr Lazarus at II was doing.

          OK, now I'm just confused. Just a minute ago you claimed not to be anti-atheist...only anti-atheism[^]. Now you're specifically targetting "internet atheists" by saying you've never personally encountered on that was "reasonable". Could you please explain this lapse of logic for me? Because clearly you are the embodiment of logic.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups