Hello folks
-
Please i need this answer asap.. if i want to do a function that accepts INTEGERS number... then i wanna the sum of these integers.. for example if i entered 123.. the answer should be 6. Thanks in advance Regards
Estarta
-
Please i need this answer asap.. if i want to do a function that accepts INTEGERS number... then i wanna the sum of these integers.. for example if i entered 123.. the answer should be 6. Thanks in advance Regards
Estarta
Sounds like homework. Why don't you make an attempt and then we'll help you with that?
Upcoming events: * Edinburgh: Web Security Conference Day for Windows Developers (12th April) * Glasgow: Introduction to AJAX (2nd May), SQL Server, Mock Objects My website
-
Please i need this answer asap.. if i want to do a function that accepts INTEGERS number... then i wanna the sum of these integers.. for example if i entered 123.. the answer should be 6. Thanks in advance Regards
Estarta
Almost certainly no one here will write the whole thing for you. Show us what you got so far, say concretely where you got stuck and we'll help you. By the way, the specification of your function is quite lousy. It is not really clear what the input is; integers, an array of integers or maybe a string with integers? From your example it seams to be the latter. If so, do you want to sum up the digits or how should the function know where to break up the string into integers?
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." - Rick Cook
-
Sounds like homework. Why don't you make an attempt and then we'll help you with that?
Upcoming events: * Edinburgh: Web Security Conference Day for Windows Developers (12th April) * Glasgow: Introduction to AJAX (2nd May), SQL Server, Mock Objects My website
Thanks for ur reply, And its not a homework, and i tried so many time i couldn't do it :~~ i just wanted to know thanks
Estarta
-
Almost certainly no one here will write the whole thing for you. Show us what you got so far, say concretely where you got stuck and we'll help you. By the way, the specification of your function is quite lousy. It is not really clear what the input is; integers, an array of integers or maybe a string with integers? From your example it seams to be the latter. If so, do you want to sum up the digits or how should the function know where to break up the string into integers?
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." - Rick Cook
Well its only INTEGERS not array any intergers. and yesterday i had this work interview and they asked me this question and it bothers me :(
Estarta
-
Well its only INTEGERS not array any intergers. and yesterday i had this work interview and they asked me this question and it bothers me :(
Estarta
i've tried, but i can't get it done! there is must be an array but how can i know how many digits are there without convert the input to string!
Estarta
-
Please i need this answer asap.. if i want to do a function that accepts INTEGERS number... then i wanna the sum of these integers.. for example if i entered 123.. the answer should be 6. Thanks in advance Regards
Estarta
-
try out public void sumOfInt(int num) { int tot =0; string nubstr = num.ToString(); for(int y=0;y < nubstr.Length; y++) { int sub = int.Parse(nubstr.Substring(y,1)); tot=tot+sub; } MessageBox.Show("Sum of Integers"+" "+tot.ToString()); }
rahul
Thanks buddy :)
Estarta
-
Well its only INTEGERS not array any intergers. and yesterday i had this work interview and they asked me this question and it bothers me :(
Estarta
Estarta wrote:
and yesterday i had this work interview and they asked me this question and it bothers me
:omg: I'd say that the job isn't the right one for you. This question is a variation (at least on the same level) as FizzBuzz For more information listen to this podcast[^] or read the transcript[^] Anyone with a software development job should be able to do that in a couple of minutes
Upcoming events: * Edinburgh: Web Security Conference Day for Windows Developers (12th April) * Glasgow: Introduction to AJAX (2nd May), SQL Server, Mock Objects My website
-
Estarta wrote:
and yesterday i had this work interview and they asked me this question and it bothers me
:omg: I'd say that the job isn't the right one for you. This question is a variation (at least on the same level) as FizzBuzz For more information listen to this podcast[^] or read the transcript[^] Anyone with a software development job should be able to do that in a couple of minutes
Upcoming events: * Edinburgh: Web Security Conference Day for Windows Developers (12th April) * Glasgow: Introduction to AJAX (2nd May), SQL Server, Mock Objects My website
Well thanks :)
Estarta
-
Estarta wrote:
and yesterday i had this work interview and they asked me this question and it bothers me
:omg: I'd say that the job isn't the right one for you. This question is a variation (at least on the same level) as FizzBuzz For more information listen to this podcast[^] or read the transcript[^] Anyone with a software development job should be able to do that in a couple of minutes
Upcoming events: * Edinburgh: Web Security Conference Day for Windows Developers (12th April) * Glasgow: Introduction to AJAX (2nd May), SQL Server, Mock Objects My website
btw wat makes u think that this JOB is not right.. u don't even know me ;p
Estarta
-
btw wat makes u think that this JOB is not right.. u don't even know me ;p
Estarta
Estarta wrote:
btw wat makes u think that this JOB is not right.. u don't even know me
He knows that you're not able to programmatically solve this quite simple problem on your own. Since the interview question implies the job has something to do with programming, your obviously not the right/best choice for the job and the other way round.
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." - Rick Cook
-
btw wat makes u think that this JOB is not right.. u don't even know me ;p
Estarta
Anyone who passed CS101 should be able to do this in 5 minutes with one hand tied behind their back. If you can't, you should give up your software aspirations and take up a new career as a burger flipper.
-- CleaKO The sad part about this instance is that none of the users ever said anything [about the problem]. Pete O`Hanlon Doesn't that just tell you everything you need to know about users?
-
try out public void sumOfInt(int num) { int tot =0; string nubstr = num.ToString(); for(int y=0;y < nubstr.Length; y++) { int sub = int.Parse(nubstr.Substring(y,1)); tot=tot+sub; } MessageBox.Show("Sum of Integers"+" "+tot.ToString()); }
rahul
Alternatively without using strings at all:
public int CrossSum(int value) {
int sum = 0;
while (value > 0) {
sum += value % 10;
value /= 10;
}
return sum;
}Frankly, Estarta, if you are applying for a job as a programmer, you should be able to write something simple as this yourself.
--- single minded; short sighted; long gone;
-
btw wat makes u think that this JOB is not right.. u don't even know me ;p
Estarta
We may not know you, but we've certainly cleaned up enough messes left by people just like you. The question was basic stuff - it shouldn't have bothered you. Even if you didn't know the ins and outs of the language, you should have been able to come up with the algorithm for it without needing to think about it. You should also have been able to explain the problem properly, without using txtspk. Overall, I'll take one Colin over 100 of you any day.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
We may not know you, but we've certainly cleaned up enough messes left by people just like you. The question was basic stuff - it shouldn't have bothered you. Even if you didn't know the ins and outs of the language, you should have been able to come up with the algorithm for it without needing to think about it. You should also have been able to explain the problem properly, without using txtspk. Overall, I'll take one Colin over 100 of you any day.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
Well thanks again for the reply. but you know you don't have to say such things if you can erase my account so do it!! but don't act like the YOU ARE THE BEST or i dont know wats the matter with u!!! i asked a question AND I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER nth to be shamed of!!! and btw i`m a software engineer we didn't took PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES as u did !! we only took the software engineering syuff and rational rose!! You dont even deserve my reply!!! Good bye MR
Estarta
-
Well thanks again for the reply. but you know you don't have to say such things if you can erase my account so do it!! but don't act like the YOU ARE THE BEST or i dont know wats the matter with u!!! i asked a question AND I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER nth to be shamed of!!! and btw i`m a software engineer we didn't took PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES as u did !! we only took the software engineering syuff and rational rose!! You dont even deserve my reply!!! Good bye MR
Estarta
By definition, a software engineer has to be able to break algorithms down. You couldn't. You're right, there's nothing to be ashamed of when you don't know the answer to a problem - unless that problem is basic. I would be interested to know how you think you are a software engineer if you didn't do any programming languages. Colin pointed out to you that you may not be pursuing the right career. I pointed out to you why I thought he'd done so because you couldn't seem to grasp this. Your answer has compounded the issue. As a professional developer, I have spent a large amount of time mentoring and helping newbie developers but I would advise anybody who couldn't get a grasp on such a basic problem to steer clear of a career in developing. More importantly, as I stated earlier, I have spent a large amount of time clearing up after people who shouldn't have been developers in the first place. If you want to prove me wrong, brush up on your algorithms, learn the basics and then move onto more advanced things.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
By definition, a software engineer has to be able to break algorithms down. You couldn't. You're right, there's nothing to be ashamed of when you don't know the answer to a problem - unless that problem is basic. I would be interested to know how you think you are a software engineer if you didn't do any programming languages. Colin pointed out to you that you may not be pursuing the right career. I pointed out to you why I thought he'd done so because you couldn't seem to grasp this. Your answer has compounded the issue. As a professional developer, I have spent a large amount of time mentoring and helping newbie developers but I would advise anybody who couldn't get a grasp on such a basic problem to steer clear of a career in developing. More importantly, as I stated earlier, I have spent a large amount of time clearing up after people who shouldn't have been developers in the first place. If you want to prove me wrong, brush up on your algorithms, learn the basics and then move onto more advanced things.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
I Know the basics.. !! int x= int.Parse(Input.Text); int t =0; string i = x.ToString(); for(int y=0;yEstarta
-
Alternatively without using strings at all:
public int CrossSum(int value) {
int sum = 0;
while (value > 0) {
sum += value % 10;
value /= 10;
}
return sum;
}Frankly, Estarta, if you are applying for a job as a programmer, you should be able to write something simple as this yourself.
--- single minded; short sighted; long gone;
Thats true. Thanks :)
Estarta
-
I Know the basics.. !! int x= int.Parse(Input.Text); int t =0; string i = x.ToString(); for(int y=0;yEstarta
that's quite a different question from the one you asked at the start :confused: Can i suggest not using the letter i to denote a string, even if it does contain the string representation of an integer. You should use Parse or TryParse on the input to make sure that the number can be represented as a number. Russell