WTF! You're not going to believe this!
-
The Grand Negus wrote:
the result of such casual relations is - for lack of a better term - minor brain damage.
If that's true it is still a very small price. I mean, just look at the price of "abstinence": I'd become like you! X|
'My country, right or wrong' is a thing no patriot would ever think of saying except in a desperate case. It is like saying 'My mother, drunk or sober.'
GK Chesterton -
The Grand Negus wrote:
that are not meant to be taken lightly or broken easily
Not meant by whom? I think that waiting can be detrimental as you should really know if your compatible or not first. Too many kids are battered because their parents can't stand each other. Marriage isn't sacred. Its a contractual relationship, but not sacred. It can be, but only if both people are compatible and they feel the same.
This statement was never false.
-
The Grand Negus wrote:
Why? Is one allowed to encourage fornication in the Lounge, but not abstinence? That seems a bit one-sided...
Actually, I agree. It also seems to be pushing the limit on the kid sister safe rule.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
Ah... but we're in the soapbox now! heh heh...
This statement was never false.
-
Yes, I was surprised to see all the encouragement here. Unless there is a serious relationship between the two I fail to see the relevance in such an affair - I'm not religious (you know that), but I think these kinds of things shouldn't be taken so lightly. This is how we end up with the spread of disease and children born into broken homes. I strongly discourage this kind of thing. (Formerly the Apocalyptic Teacup)
"The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduce them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim." -Gustave Le Bon
5. The only sensible response I've seen.
-
Given that you and Mr. Negus are religious and the general reaction to his post, I'm probably one of the very few non-religious* chaps here that agrees with you on this. :) * I dislike labels but 'agnostic' fits me best.
Cheers, Vikram.
The cold will freeze our stares We won't care...
Join the CP group at NationStates. Password:
byalmightybobReligion has absolutely nothing to do with my interest in the science of brain chemistry, nor does that science particularly endorse ( or otherwise ) my beliefs.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
-
The Grand Negus wrote:
the result of such casual relations is - for lack of a better term - minor brain damage.
*grin* you're absolutely right. I do a lot of reading on the chemstry of attraction and also on brain differences between the sexes. I wonder how many relationships exist solely because of the attraction that comes about because there's sex going on. Or at least, how many relationships exist for a brief period on this basis, before the initial infatuation stage wears off.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
Christian Graus wrote:
*grin* you're absolutely right. I do a lot of reading on the chemstry of attraction and also on brain differences between the sexes. I wonder how many relationships exist solely because of the attraction that comes about because there's sex going on. Or at least, how many relationships exist for a brief period on this basis, before the initial infatuation stage wears off.
What difference does a ring make?
-
A (girl) friend of mine just called me, and asked me to spend the night with her... WTF! ...I hope it's not a joke...
whats the update on this - its been a day bryce
--- To paraphrase Fred Dagg - the views expressed in this post are bloody good ones. --
Publitor, making Pubmed easy. http://www.sohocode.com/publitorOur kids books :The Snot Goblin, and Book 2 - the Snotgoblin and Fluff
-
The Grand Negus wrote:
Why? Is one allowed to encourage fornication in the Lounge, but not abstinence? That seems a bit one-sided...
My comment was largely in jest, but was perhaps not interpreted that way for which I appologise, yours seemed more provoative and likely to cause a soap box style discussion. I think linking rape to premarital consentual sex is ridiculous
-
I'm in a Link2006 thread. \o/
Found on Bash.org [erno] hm. I've lost a machine.. literally _lost_. it responds to ping, it works completely, I just can't figure out where in my apartment it is.
ROFLMAO! :-D
-- Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
-
She called me and told me she'd wave her fee because she gets all her money from you.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001That ought to be waive, not wave...
-- Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
-
Christian Graus wrote:
*grin* you're absolutely right. I do a lot of reading on the chemstry of attraction and also on brain differences between the sexes. I wonder how many relationships exist solely because of the attraction that comes about because there's sex going on. Or at least, how many relationships exist for a brief period on this basis, before the initial infatuation stage wears off.
What difference does a ring make?
Exactly. And with the rate of divorce... well, this institution isn't sacred and doesn't guarantee that the same minor brain damage being discussed won't happen anyway. Or what happens when people wait til their married, only to discover that they hate each other. The assumptions regarding marriage are just absurd. Nice idea, but only works sometimes.
This statement was never false.
-
Exactly. And with the rate of divorce... well, this institution isn't sacred and doesn't guarantee that the same minor brain damage being discussed won't happen anyway. Or what happens when people wait til their married, only to discover that they hate each other. The assumptions regarding marriage are just absurd. Nice idea, but only works sometimes.
This statement was never false.
-
whats the update on this - its been a day bryce
--- To paraphrase Fred Dagg - the views expressed in this post are bloody good ones. --
Publitor, making Pubmed easy. http://www.sohocode.com/publitorOur kids books :The Snot Goblin, and Book 2 - the Snotgoblin and Fluff
-
whats the update on this - its been a day bryce
--- To paraphrase Fred Dagg - the views expressed in this post are bloody good ones. --
Publitor, making Pubmed easy. http://www.sohocode.com/publitorOur kids books :The Snot Goblin, and Book 2 - the Snotgoblin and Fluff
-
The Grand Negus wrote:
Why? Is one allowed to encourage fornication in the Lounge, but not abstinence? That seems a bit one-sided...
My comment was largely in jest, but was perhaps not interpreted that way for which I appologise, yours seemed more provoative and likely to cause a soap box style discussion. I think linking rape to premarital consentual sex is ridiculous
-
The Grand Negus wrote:
Casual sex, even if it is consensual, leaves the woman consciously or unconsciously feeling unsatisfied, used, betrayed, even abused.
But sex outside marriage is not necessarily casual. Are you suggesting that brain damage can be avoided by partaking in a ritual ceremony?
-
A (girl) friend of mine just called me, and asked me to spend the night with her... WTF! ...I hope it's not a joke...
A couple had been married for a couple of years, still at the honeymoon stage of the relationship. It was the guys birthday and his wife did not give him anything that morning, but told him he was going to get something very special if he could be patient. Thrilled and excited he was patient, but thinking all day what she was going to do. When he came home, she only smiled and escorted him into the back room and said it was still too soon, that he would get a wonderful surprise if he could be patient. She smiled slyly and slipped back out the door closing it behind him. The husband quickly undressed and standing naked waited for his wife to come back. She gently said through the door, "you can come out now." And he through the door open standing stark naked in front of all his friends and family and a very embarrassed wife. the moral: don't count your chickens before they are hatched. :) or don't get undressed before your wife, not sure which....
_________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
-
A (girl) friend of mine just called me, and asked me to spend the night with her... WTF! ...I hope it's not a joke...
-
Christian Graus wrote:
*grin* you're absolutely right. I do a lot of reading on the chemstry of attraction and also on brain differences between the sexes. I wonder how many relationships exist solely because of the attraction that comes about because there's sex going on. Or at least, how many relationships exist for a brief period on this basis, before the initial infatuation stage wears off.
What difference does a ring make?
None at all. I just mean that in general, a relationship shouldn't move too quickly to incuding sex. The ring is irrelevant, in those terms, and in terms of my post. I suspect I inherited the association from Negus, and while that's how I live *my* life, I meant it more broadly, that people who have sex too quickly, build bad relationships. My sister in law does it all the time.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
