Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Fred T.

Fred T.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestion
33 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Al Beback

    Rob Graham wrote:

    Laws and policies that are unenforced or unenforceable are worse than pointless, they delude us into a false sense of security.

    I agree that enforcement is required as an additional deterrent. I doubt that would have stopped a nutcase like Cho though.


    SUPPORT OUR TROOPS

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Red Stateler
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Al Beback wrote:

    I agree that enforcement is required as an additional deterrent.

    How would you do that without violating "privacy"?

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Red Stateler

      Al Beback wrote:

      The difficult question is: how many accidental shootings or crimes of passion have been prevented because of the school's anti-gun policy?

      You should be able to extrapolate that. There are 800-900[^] accidental gun deaths per year in the US (as of 2001) and 300 million people. Va Tech has about 25,000 students. If students there carried guns with the same prevelance as the population as a whole (and they probably wouldn't since they are more likely to be more liberal and have less discretionary money), we would expect there to be 0.075 accidental deaths/year, or one accidental death every 13 years. It would take 426 years before 32 students were killed. I don't know how to estimate crimes of passion, but my understanding is that those are overwhelmingly committed in the home and would therefore be negligable on campus. But arbitrarily saying that 25% of gun crimes are "crimes of passion", it would take 153 years before 32 were killed.

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      Red Stateler wrote:

      to estimate crimes of passion, but my understanding is that those are overwhelmingly committed in the home and would therefore be negligable on campus

      With students? Barely post-teenagers with raging hormones, shitty judgement, and little perspective? I don't know about that. All I know is that if I were at Virgina Tech that day, I would have wanted to be armed and well-trained in the use of my firearm. *shrug* I can't comment on the whole should there be more guns/should there be less guns thing you guys have going on down there because I don't really understand the dynamics of your society, and frankly, there's good arguments on all sides. But I wouldn't want my only option in that situation to be playing dead. Pardon my French, but fuck that. I'm currently in the process of being registered to own and use unrestricted firearms (not because of the VT thing, but for backcountry protection against bears in northern BC). Frankly, I'm more likely to come across a bear than I am a handgun anyway. I don't know if that's a good or a bad thing :).

      - F "You are really weird." - Kyle, age 16

      R J 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • M Mike Gaskey

        Al Beback wrote:

        would you then agree with the school's policy?

        no, sure wouldn't. without that policy in place a thoroughly evil nut job like this guy would have to assume that one or two of his classmates in a lecture hall just might be carrying. The way I see it, if you have a law / rule / whatever that says, "no guns here dude" then law abiding citizens will say, "okay", but a thoroughly eveil nut job will say, "cool!".

        Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.

        A Offline
        A Offline
        Al Beback
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        Mike Gaskey wrote:

        The way I see it, if you have a law / rule / whatever that says, "no guns here dude" then law abiding citizens will say, "okay", but a thoroughly eveil nut job will say, "cool!".

        Yep, it's the sad truth.


        SUPPORT OUR TROOPS

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Red Stateler wrote:

          to estimate crimes of passion, but my understanding is that those are overwhelmingly committed in the home and would therefore be negligable on campus

          With students? Barely post-teenagers with raging hormones, shitty judgement, and little perspective? I don't know about that. All I know is that if I were at Virgina Tech that day, I would have wanted to be armed and well-trained in the use of my firearm. *shrug* I can't comment on the whole should there be more guns/should there be less guns thing you guys have going on down there because I don't really understand the dynamics of your society, and frankly, there's good arguments on all sides. But I wouldn't want my only option in that situation to be playing dead. Pardon my French, but fuck that. I'm currently in the process of being registered to own and use unrestricted firearms (not because of the VT thing, but for backcountry protection against bears in northern BC). Frankly, I'm more likely to come across a bear than I am a handgun anyway. I don't know if that's a good or a bad thing :).

          - F "You are really weird." - Kyle, age 16

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Red Stateler
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          Fisticuffs wrote:

          With students? Barely post-teenagers with raging hormones, shitty judgement, and little perspective? I don't know about that.

          I wonder if there are any studies on the topic, since a university is a very different environment than the "real world", or if there are any larger universities that allow concealed weapons that track those numbers. Of course, you can further adjust it by age[^]. About a third of murders are committed by those in the college-age group (being disproportionately high).

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Mike Gaskey

            opinion on gun free zones[^] - quite possibly the next GOP POTUS candidate.

            Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            James L Thomson
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            Gun policies aside, I've always seen advertising areas as gun-free zones as like walking around in D.C. advertising yourself as unarmed and carrying cash. It has to be one of the most remarkably stupid "safety initiatives" in human history.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Red Stateler

              Al Beback wrote:

              I agree that enforcement is required as an additional deterrent.

              How would you do that without violating "privacy"?

              A Offline
              A Offline
              Al Beback
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              Red Stateler wrote:

              How would you do that without violating "privacy"?

              I was pondering the same thing, and the only thing that came to mind is doing what many federal buildings do: have an X-ray machine at every doorway, along with a couple of cops, 24/7. What an expensive hassle! X|


              SUPPORT OUR TROOPS

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Mike Gaskey

                opinion on gun free zones[^] - quite possibly the next GOP POTUS candidate.

                Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                I like his views. I was wondering if this incident would further motivate people to speak up against and vote for law makers wanting to ban guns or further restrict their use. However I am seeing evidence to the contrary which is excellent. I'm glad there are people like him to have more sense than those gun grabbers.

                █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Mike Gaskey

                  opinion on gun free zones[^] - quite possibly the next GOP POTUS candidate.

                  Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  led mike
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Well he certainly is a Law and Order[^] kind of guy

                  led mike

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L led mike

                    Well he certainly is a Law and Order[^] kind of guy

                    led mike

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mike Gaskey
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    led mike wrote:

                    Well he certainly is a Law and Order[^] kind of guy

                    a new incarnation of RR. His voice alone is worth 5 points in the polls.

                    Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Al Beback

                      Red Stateler wrote:

                      How would you do that without violating "privacy"?

                      I was pondering the same thing, and the only thing that came to mind is doing what many federal buildings do: have an X-ray machine at every doorway, along with a couple of cops, 24/7. What an expensive hassle! X|


                      SUPPORT OUR TROOPS

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Russell Morris
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      Al Beback wrote:

                      I was pondering the same thing, and the only thing that came to mind is doing what many federal buildings do: have an X-ray machine at every doorway, along with a couple of cops, 24/7. What an expensive hassle!

                      And a police state...

                      "I hope he can see this, because I'm doing it as hard as I can" - Ignignot

                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Russell Morris

                        Al Beback wrote:

                        I was pondering the same thing, and the only thing that came to mind is doing what many federal buildings do: have an X-ray machine at every doorway, along with a couple of cops, 24/7. What an expensive hassle!

                        And a police state...

                        "I hope he can see this, because I'm doing it as hard as I can" - Ignignot

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        David Wulff
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        If you want to play with fire, surely it is best to have a fire marshall nearby?


                        Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
                        Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
                        I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk

                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D David Wulff

                          If you want to play with fire, surely it is best to have a fire marshall nearby?


                          Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
                          Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
                          I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Russell Morris
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          David Wulff wrote:

                          If you want to play with fire, surely it is best to have a fire marshall nearby?

                          Nearby is fine. If he wants to setup residence in the doorway, he damn well better bring some chips and a six-pack. And take a walk between 8 and 9 - that's me time.

                          -- Russell Morris Morbo: "WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!"

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Red Stateler

                            Nathan Addy wrote:

                            So just guessing

                            Yeah....I'll say. I'll apply my own made-up number. Since college students are poor (and guns are bullets are expensive) and tend to be more liberal, there will likely be far fewer guns when compared to the general population. This figure will therefore be reduced by a factor of two, thus offsetting your increased factor of two. I found that in 2004, about 30%[^] of murders committed were because of an "argument" (which I would classify as a crime of passion). So my arbitary guess of 25% was very close.

                            E Offline
                            E Offline
                            Ed Gadziemski
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            You recently stated that gun ownership per capita is down over the past five decades. The number of homes with a gun has decreased from 50% of homes to 35%. The link you provided here shows homicides dropped almost 50% from their peak in 1991, at the same time as gun ownership was also falling, thus proving that less guns equals less murders and a safer America. Good on ya, mate.

                            R M 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • M Mike Gaskey

                              opinion on gun free zones[^] - quite possibly the next GOP POTUS candidate.

                              Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.

                              J Offline
                              J Offline
                              JWood
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              Yeh I am against gun control. The founding fathers had a good reason for the 2nd amendment - they spelled it out really well. I don't know why people have such trouble reading these days.


                              A cynic is a man who, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin.
                              -H.L. Mencken

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • E Ed Gadziemski

                                You recently stated that gun ownership per capita is down over the past five decades. The number of homes with a gun has decreased from 50% of homes to 35%. The link you provided here shows homicides dropped almost 50% from their peak in 1991, at the same time as gun ownership was also falling, thus proving that less guns equals less murders and a safer America. Good on ya, mate.

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                Red Stateler
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                Ed Gadziemski wrote:

                                thus proving

                                Something tells me you failed every math and science class you've ever taken....Ever.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • E Ed Gadziemski

                                  You recently stated that gun ownership per capita is down over the past five decades. The number of homes with a gun has decreased from 50% of homes to 35%. The link you provided here shows homicides dropped almost 50% from their peak in 1991, at the same time as gun ownership was also falling, thus proving that less guns equals less murders and a safer America. Good on ya, mate.

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mundo Cani
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  Ed Gadziemski wrote:

                                  thus proving...

                                  You're joking, right? Without examining any other contributing factors you're ready to put the drop in murder rate entirely on a drop in gun ownership? That's bad science.

                                  Ian

                                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Mundo Cani

                                    Ed Gadziemski wrote:

                                    thus proving...

                                    You're joking, right? Without examining any other contributing factors you're ready to put the drop in murder rate entirely on a drop in gun ownership? That's bad science.

                                    Ian

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    ibowler wrote:

                                    That's bad science.

                                    But that's right up Stateler's alley? :~

                                    -- Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      Red Stateler wrote:

                                      to estimate crimes of passion, but my understanding is that those are overwhelmingly committed in the home and would therefore be negligable on campus

                                      With students? Barely post-teenagers with raging hormones, shitty judgement, and little perspective? I don't know about that. All I know is that if I were at Virgina Tech that day, I would have wanted to be armed and well-trained in the use of my firearm. *shrug* I can't comment on the whole should there be more guns/should there be less guns thing you guys have going on down there because I don't really understand the dynamics of your society, and frankly, there's good arguments on all sides. But I wouldn't want my only option in that situation to be playing dead. Pardon my French, but fuck that. I'm currently in the process of being registered to own and use unrestricted firearms (not because of the VT thing, but for backcountry protection against bears in northern BC). Frankly, I'm more likely to come across a bear than I am a handgun anyway. I don't know if that's a good or a bad thing :).

                                      - F "You are really weird." - Kyle, age 16

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      Just make sure you buy a big friggin' gun. Small caliber guns will just irritate the bear...

                                      -- Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Mike Gaskey

                                        opinion on gun free zones[^] - quite possibly the next GOP POTUS candidate.

                                        Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.

                                        J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        John Carson
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #29

                                        Mike Gaskey wrote:

                                        quite possibly the next GOP POTUS candidate

                                        One of only five Republicans who voted not to impeach Clinton for perjury. Clearly a degenerate.

                                        John Carson

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J John Carson

                                          Mike Gaskey wrote:

                                          quite possibly the next GOP POTUS candidate

                                          One of only five Republicans who voted not to impeach Clinton for perjury. Clearly a degenerate.

                                          John Carson

                                          M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Mike Gaskey
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #30

                                          John Carson wrote:

                                          One of only five Republicans who voted not to impeach Clinton for perjury. Clearly a degenerate

                                          strike 1

                                          Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups