An American Ranger
-
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
-
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
So, he wants to keep his job.
-
So, he wants to keep his job.
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
So, he wants to keep his job.
wow, what an interpretation. the answer is, no. He wants to do his job, he's a Ranger whether sitting on his ass in the US or walking the streets in Ramadi.
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
-
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
Wow! thanks for posting that. And, BTW, I don't believe the traitor rhetoric is over the top either. The democrats are traitors to every thing this country has ever stood for. They may be as patriotic as hell to the things they believe in, but those things are diametrically opposite of traditional American principles.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
-
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
-
That is one great Soldier no doubt and it's easy to imagine most are similar to him. I have seen nothing yet that makes me believe we will pull out of Iraq so I certainly hope he is right when he says we can finish the job.
led mike
led mike wrote:
I have seen nothing yet that makes me believe we will pull out of Iraq so I certainly hope he is right when he says we can finish the job.
thank you led, I do as well.
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
-
Wow! thanks for posting that. And, BTW, I don't believe the traitor rhetoric is over the top either. The democrats are traitors to every thing this country has ever stood for. They may be as patriotic as hell to the things they believe in, but those things are diametrically opposite of traditional American principles.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
Awesome, wasn't it.
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
-
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
Some more representative opinions. http://www.militarycity.com/polls/2006_main.php[^]
John Carson
-
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
Great post. Thanks for putting that up. I think all of the democratic efforts are nothing more than politcal strategy. They know that Bush will veto the current funding bills. They will then use that in their presidential campaigns to get a democratic president elected. Once elected, the new president will "suddenly" realize (perhaps with "new" information) that we should continue the effort and that it would be irresponsible to withdrawl troops now. The problem is that the message that Iraq troops and civilians are standing up for themselves and turning in terrorists is not being made available to the public. I think that is what most of us want to see, the Iraqis doing the job for themselves with our help as needed. I am glad that soldier called in. We need more like him.
-
Great post. Thanks for putting that up. I think all of the democratic efforts are nothing more than politcal strategy. They know that Bush will veto the current funding bills. They will then use that in their presidential campaigns to get a democratic president elected. Once elected, the new president will "suddenly" realize (perhaps with "new" information) that we should continue the effort and that it would be irresponsible to withdrawl troops now. The problem is that the message that Iraq troops and civilians are standing up for themselves and turning in terrorists is not being made available to the public. I think that is what most of us want to see, the Iraqis doing the job for themselves with our help as needed. I am glad that soldier called in. We need more like him.
Bob Flynn wrote:
Once elected, the new president will "suddenly" realize (perhaps with "new" information) that we should continue the effort and that it would be irresponsible to withdrawl troops now.
They realize that now. That's why every proposal to "withdraw troops now" dies a quiet death as soon as its done making noise. We're stuck between a president with not much of a plan, and a congress with no plan at all and no backbone to properly critique the Executive plans.
Bob Flynn wrote:
The problem is that the message that Iraq troops and civilians are standing up for themselves and turning in terrorists is not being made available to the public.
IMHO, that's just the tip of the iceberg. At this point, we could be handed detailed information on every single positive occurrence and still reject it or take it with a grain of salt the size of a Humvee - there has been just entirely too much manipulation of the press to take anything seriously from this administration. It's a bit late in the game to try honesty and still hope anyone believes you. Though of course, better late than never.
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
-
Wow! thanks for posting that. And, BTW, I don't believe the traitor rhetoric is over the top either. The democrats are traitors to every thing this country has ever stood for. They may be as patriotic as hell to the things they believe in, but those things are diametrically opposite of traditional American principles.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
Stan Shannon wrote:
They may be as patriotic as hell to the things they believe in, but those things are diametrically opposite of traditional American principles
Yeah, freedom, self-determination, tolerance, forgiveness, charity, democracy. Democrats believe strongly in those things even though those things are diametrically opposed to traditional American principles. At least those supposed principles espoused by your brand of rightists.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
They may be as patriotic as hell to the things they believe in, but those things are diametrically opposite of traditional American principles
Yeah, freedom, self-determination, tolerance, forgiveness, charity, democracy. Democrats believe strongly in those things even though those things are diametrically opposed to traditional American principles. At least those supposed principles espoused by your brand of rightists.
Ed Gadziemski wrote:
Yeah, freedom, self-determination, tolerance, forgiveness, charity, democracy. Democrats believe strongly in those things
source? -- modified at 14:08 Friday 27th April, 2007 modiied to add, charity? the Democrats I know, and I admittedly work to keep that a small group, believe charity emanates from a central government, ie., my tax money.
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
-
Great post. Thanks for putting that up. I think all of the democratic efforts are nothing more than politcal strategy. They know that Bush will veto the current funding bills. They will then use that in their presidential campaigns to get a democratic president elected. Once elected, the new president will "suddenly" realize (perhaps with "new" information) that we should continue the effort and that it would be irresponsible to withdrawl troops now. The problem is that the message that Iraq troops and civilians are standing up for themselves and turning in terrorists is not being made available to the public. I think that is what most of us want to see, the Iraqis doing the job for themselves with our help as needed. I am glad that soldier called in. We need more like him.
Bob Flynn wrote:
Iraq troops and civilians are standing up for themselves and turning in terrorists
F-in bunch of collaborators and traitors. They will be dealt with after the occupiers leave, just like Nazi sympathizers were after WW2.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
They may be as patriotic as hell to the things they believe in, but those things are diametrically opposite of traditional American principles
Yeah, freedom, self-determination, tolerance, forgiveness, charity, democracy. Democrats believe strongly in those things even though those things are diametrically opposed to traditional American principles. At least those supposed principles espoused by your brand of rightists.
Ed Gadziemski wrote:
Yeah, freedom, self-determination, tolerance, forgiveness, charity, democracy. Democrats believe strongly in those things...
So do Republicans, Libertarians, Greens & independents. If only the clowns that get elected would actually "live" what they claim to believe. :doh:
"I'm a great believer in luck, and I find the harder I work the more I have of it." - Thomas Jefferson
-
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
Rangers are pussies. They used to be tough, but quality went way down after the 1970s.
-
Rangers are pussies. They used to be tough, but quality went way down after the 1970s.
Ed Gadziemski wrote:
They used to be tough but, the quality went way down after the 1970s.
Really? What happened in the '70s?
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
-
Ed Gadziemski wrote:
Yeah, freedom, self-determination, tolerance, forgiveness, charity, democracy. Democrats believe strongly in those things
source? -- modified at 14:08 Friday 27th April, 2007 modiied to add, charity? the Democrats I know, and I admittedly work to keep that a small group, believe charity emanates from a central government, ie., my tax money.
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
Mike Gaskey wrote:
modiied to add, charity? the Democrats I know, and I admittedly work to keep that a small group, believe charity emanates from a central government, ie., my tax money.
Since redistribution of wealth via a centralized authority is compulsory, it's not "charity". It's extortion.
-
Mike Gaskey wrote:
modiied to add, charity? the Democrats I know, and I admittedly work to keep that a small group, believe charity emanates from a central government, ie., my tax money.
Since redistribution of wealth via a centralized authority is compulsory, it's not "charity". It's extortion.
Red Stateler wrote:
It's extortion
yep
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
-
Bob Flynn wrote:
Once elected, the new president will "suddenly" realize (perhaps with "new" information) that we should continue the effort and that it would be irresponsible to withdrawl troops now.
They realize that now. That's why every proposal to "withdraw troops now" dies a quiet death as soon as its done making noise. We're stuck between a president with not much of a plan, and a congress with no plan at all and no backbone to properly critique the Executive plans.
Bob Flynn wrote:
The problem is that the message that Iraq troops and civilians are standing up for themselves and turning in terrorists is not being made available to the public.
IMHO, that's just the tip of the iceberg. At this point, we could be handed detailed information on every single positive occurrence and still reject it or take it with a grain of salt the size of a Humvee - there has been just entirely too much manipulation of the press to take anything seriously from this administration. It's a bit late in the game to try honesty and still hope anyone believes you. Though of course, better late than never.
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
Shog9 wrote:
They realize that now. That's why every proposal to "withdraw troops now" dies a quiet death as soon as its done making noise.
I agree, but I do not think that their (Democratic party) concern is about the war at all. I think that their efforts are all calculated to improve their chances of winning the next presidential elections.
Shog9 wrote:
there has been just entirely too much manipulation of the press to take anything seriously from this administration
I am not convinced that one side or the other (Dems vs Reps) have manipulated the media more than the other. But I do agree that the common perception is exactly as you described it.
Shog9 wrote:
It's a bit late in the game to try honesty and still hope anyone believes you. Though of course, better late than never.
Thats why I think that this soldier's comments are so good. He is giving first hand accounts of his experiences. More of that is needed from the troops on the ground.
-
Rangers are pussies. They used to be tough, but quality went way down after the 1970s.