An American Ranger
-
Shog9 wrote:
Do you have something against discrimination? I find it a very useful technique.
When you go fuckwire on me because I called someone a loose pussy with a yeast infection, yet when someone else calls someone a pussy you don't even notice it. I know you understand, you just fail to admit it.
Shog9 wrote:
Perhaps you've been discriminated against for something you had no control over?
Yes, my last name.
Shog9 wrote:
i'm discriminating on aspects that are well within your power to change.
Shut up you dick sucking vapor head. I'm not going to go on with this argument forever because it has no value to me. Pussy with a yeast infection and also loaded with cum from 5 black guys strait out of prison.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Captain See Sharp wrote:
When you go fuckwire on me
Actually, i didn't. Are you recalling a different thread perhaps?
Captain See Sharp wrote:
Shut up you dick sucking vapor head.
See, there you go again. You really ought to work on that...
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
-
Mike Gaskey wrote:
modiied to add, charity? the Democrats I know, and I admittedly work to keep that a small group, believe charity emanates from a central government, ie., my tax money.
Since redistribution of wealth via a centralized authority is compulsory, it's not "charity". It's extortion.
Red Stateler wrote:
It's extortion.
No, it's slavery.
-
Your a fucking idiot. If you think Rangers are pussies then you must be a loose pussy with a yeast infection.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Seriously, you have got to watch that language. Just yesterday Josh Grey and I got into something like this. What I took away from it was that people on the web really loose a sense of reality and say things they would never say face to face with someone. I for one have been guilty of this in the past and I've even directed it at you. Sorry. Now, back to watching the language. You never know who is on the other end it could lead toward getting your ass kicked one day.
-
Seriously, you have got to watch that language. Just yesterday Josh Grey and I got into something like this. What I took away from it was that people on the web really loose a sense of reality and say things they would never say face to face with someone. I for one have been guilty of this in the past and I've even directed it at you. Sorry. Now, back to watching the language. You never know who is on the other end it could lead toward getting your ass kicked one day.
Chris Austin wrote:
You never know who is on the other end it could lead toward getting your ass kicked one day.
That would be foolish because I take physical threats very seriously. I have absolutely no tolerance for it. The person would end up with a few very deep cuts or his eyes mashed into his brain.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
Chris Austin wrote:
You never know who is on the other end it could lead toward getting your ass kicked one day.
That would be foolish because I take physical threats very seriously. I have absolutely no tolerance for it. The person would end up with a few very deep cuts or his eyes mashed into his brain.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
I am just saying...you never know who you are talking to.. I made no threats, veiled or overt. But, along that vein, would you say what you said to someone face to face?
-
I am just saying...you never know who you are talking to.. I made no threats, veiled or overt. But, along that vein, would you say what you said to someone face to face?
Chris Austin wrote:
But, along that vein, would you say what you said to someone face to face?
Yeah, if someone says rangers are pussies then I can confidently say that he is a loose pussy with a yeast infection and if he don't like it he can go fuck him self. If he is a bitch then the bitch ain't gonna do shit but bitch.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
Chris Austin wrote:
But, along that vein, would you say what you said to someone face to face?
Yeah, if someone says rangers are pussies then I can confidently say that he is a loose pussy with a yeast infection and if he don't like it he can go fuck him self. If he is a bitch then the bitch ain't gonna do shit but bitch.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
OKIE DOKIE. Good luck with that.
My Blog A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. - -Lazarus Long
-
Shog9 wrote:
I'm pretty sure i remember how David wrote when he was your age - and as vulgar as he might have been at times, it never approached this sort of tasteless, humorless, worthless spew.
This is exactly the point of the original message. It seems I have discovered something offensive that I can now use to my advantage.
Shog9 wrote:
Show some respect. If not for the other people on this forum, then for the older and wiser CSS that will someday have to live down the reputation you're building for him.
This is the soapbox and if you have noticed, which I'm pretty sure you have, there is a notice at the top that says enter at your own risk. The original post was for Ed, he has no respect for the rangers. Calling them pussies, if he thinks they are pussies then what is he? I'm sure he ain't no uber tough bad ass. Keeping with the analogy, he called them pussies, so he must be a loose pussy with a yeast infection. Now are you going to talk to Ed about his fowl language and lack of respect to not only the people on this forum but the Rangers also? I doubt you will or anyone else for that matter. The older wiser CSS will not worry about what people on a internet forum think about him nor do I now. I don't come here to try to make a good impression so someone might consider contacting me for work. I doubt that would ever happen anyways since my articles are so simple and I hardly ever answer programming questions on the forums. Right now programming is just a hobby, I really enjoy it and thats why I do it. If I want to make money programming I will figure out a way, software is an extremely diverse market and I can come up with a product and make it usable on the first version.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Captain See Sharp wrote:
The original post was for Ed, he has no respect for the rangers. Calling them pussies, if he thinks they are pussies then what is he? I'm sure he ain't no uber tough bad ass. Keeping with the analogy, he called them pussies, so he must be a loose pussy with a yeast infection.
Actually, I think that Ed's metaphor was intended to refer to a cat, not female genitals.
John Carson
-
Captain See Sharp wrote:
The original post was for Ed, he has no respect for the rangers. Calling them pussies, if he thinks they are pussies then what is he? I'm sure he ain't no uber tough bad ass. Keeping with the analogy, he called them pussies, so he must be a loose pussy with a yeast infection.
Actually, I think that Ed's metaphor was intended to refer to a cat, not female genitals.
John Carson
-
John Carson wrote:
Actually, I think that Ed's metaphor was intended to refer to a cat, not female genitals.
Your an idiot.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
oh god baby that makes me hot
-
oh god baby that makes me hot
-
Captain See Sharp wrote:
It seems I have discovered something offensive that I can now use to my advantage.
What, you thought you were running out of ways to look childish? Don't worry - you can always fall back onto one of those all-caps cuss-fests you're so fond of. :rolleyes:
Captain See Sharp wrote:
The original post was for Ed, he has no respect for the rangers.
So, you're a Ranger? Or you just think they're so precious that they need to be defended on obscure message boards...?
Captain See Sharp wrote:
I doubt you will or anyone else for that matter.
I replied before you did. Or did you just miss that, what with the lack of blatant vulgarity in my post...
Captain See Sharp wrote:
The older wiser CSS will not worry about what people on a internet forum think about him nor do I now.
Yeah, i think that's pretty obvious. But you might want to remember that the next time someone's giving you a hard time... It really doesn't matter what you say you're like "in real life" - here, you are only what your words portray you as, and you'd better be prepared for whatever that amounts to...
Captain See Sharp wrote:
I don't come here to try to make a good impression so someone might consider contacting me for work.
I'd be pretty scared of anyone looking for new hires in The Soapbox... :^)
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
Shog9 wrote:
I'd be pretty scared of anyone looking for new hires in The Soapbox...
:laugh:
-
Captain See Sharp wrote:
When you go fuckwire on me
Actually, i didn't. Are you recalling a different thread perhaps?
Captain See Sharp wrote:
Shut up you dick sucking vapor head.
See, there you go again. You really ought to work on that...
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
Shog, do you have decades left in your life trying to correct him? :)
-
Shog9 wrote:
I'm pretty sure i remember how David wrote when he was your age - and as vulgar as he might have been at times, it never approached this sort of tasteless, humorless, worthless spew.
This is exactly the point of the original message. It seems I have discovered something offensive that I can now use to my advantage.
Shog9 wrote:
Show some respect. If not for the other people on this forum, then for the older and wiser CSS that will someday have to live down the reputation you're building for him.
This is the soapbox and if you have noticed, which I'm pretty sure you have, there is a notice at the top that says enter at your own risk. The original post was for Ed, he has no respect for the rangers. Calling them pussies, if he thinks they are pussies then what is he? I'm sure he ain't no uber tough bad ass. Keeping with the analogy, he called them pussies, so he must be a loose pussy with a yeast infection. Now are you going to talk to Ed about his fowl language and lack of respect to not only the people on this forum but the Rangers also? I doubt you will or anyone else for that matter. The older wiser CSS will not worry about what people on a internet forum think about him nor do I now. I don't come here to try to make a good impression so someone might consider contacting me for work. I doubt that would ever happen anyways since my articles are so simple and I hardly ever answer programming questions on the forums. Right now programming is just a hobby, I really enjoy it and thats why I do it. If I want to make money programming I will figure out a way, software is an extremely diverse market and I can come up with a product and make it usable on the first version.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
Seriously, you have got to watch that language. Just yesterday Josh Grey and I got into something like this. What I took away from it was that people on the web really loose a sense of reality and say things they would never say face to face with someone. I for one have been guilty of this in the past and I've even directed it at you. Sorry. Now, back to watching the language. You never know who is on the other end it could lead toward getting your ass kicked one day.
Chris Austin wrote:
Just yesterday Josh Grey and I got into something like this.
At least spell it right. If you go around telling people their dead relatives are worthless and the worlds better off without them I think you should expect a response that relfects the amount of emotion a discussion like that is likely to generate. I did reply to you again after I calmed down.
-
Chris Austin wrote:
Just yesterday Josh Grey and I got into something like this.
At least spell it right. If you go around telling people their dead relatives are worthless and the worlds better off without them I think you should expect a response that relfects the amount of emotion a discussion like that is likely to generate. I did reply to you again after I calmed down.
Josh Gray wrote:
At least spell it right.
Sorry about that.
My Blog A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. - -Lazarus Long