This is just beautiful!

[jchigg2000]

If txtProvCt.Text = txtProvCtS Then Else giUpdate = True End If

[CPallini]

and not unusual... :-D

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

[Pete OHanlon]

CPallini wrote:

and not unusual...

Queue the Tom Jones soundtrack.

Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

[The ANZAC]

Lol, i used to do that when i first was teaching myself, then i discovered if not.

Posted by The ANZAC

[NormDroid]

Ah a VB users snippet, lack of understanding promotes bad coding.

.net is a box of never ending treasures, every day I get find another gem.

[Kochise]

It's one of my coding rules, which is really useful once you get the point :

if(NULL != l_poStrTest)
{ // Format error message
l_poStrTest->Format
( "My code : %d"
, l_nErrorCode
);
}
else
{ // Error code
}

It's also all about defines :

#define MY_TEST

#ifndef MY_TEST
int l_nSize = GetStringSize(l_poStrText);
#else // MY_TEST
// int l_nSize = TempoFunc(l_poStrText);
#endif // MY_TEST

By doing so, I write the full structure of the code which is then ready to fill up, and it also helps to keep an eye-track of the execution logic (inequal statement first) so that you don't have to know if the test is about inequality (!= or #ifndef) or equality (== or #ifdef). You just have to spot the upper or lower block of code and see if it is defined/filled or not... This also force to structure carefully your code and put some air between the lines, instead to write a rock-compact block of code... Kochise PS : I often write empty equality code like this

if(NULL != l_poStrTest)
{ // Format error message
l_poStrTest->Format
( "My code : %d"
, l_nErrorCode
);
}
else{} // Error code, ready to be unrolled and filled with error handling code

In Code we trust !

[Sylvester george]

= is more faster than !=..thats why:):-D

Regards, Sylvester G sylvester_g_m@yahoo.com