Be Brave --- Tell Us All You Want to Lose in Iraq
-
jparken wrote:
Those of you who are taking the stance that the US needs to exit stay in Iraq in accordance with the Democrat Republican timetable, please step forward and claim your allegiance --- if you want the US to lose the war in Iraq more soldiers,
Hmmm, I propose you say it like this. This way it's less biased. Don't you agree? :rolleyes:
"There are II kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who understand Roman numerals." - Bassam Abdul-Baki Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
I propose you say it like this
if you don't want to lose another 46,000 people in the USA next year, vote to outlaw automobiles.
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
-
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
I propose you say it like this
if you don't want to lose another 46,000 people in the USA next year, vote to outlaw automobiles.
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
-
see, reasonable people can compromise.
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
-
see, reasonable people can compromise.
Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. dennisd45: My view of the world is slightly more nuanced dennisd45 (the NAMBLA supporter) wrote: I know exactly what it means. So shut up you mother killing baby raper.
Mike Gaskey wrote:
see, reasonable people can compromise.
I think not. I want a complex system of suction tubes.
-
Those of you who are taking the stance that the US needs to exit Iraq in accordance with the Democrat timetable, please step forward and claim your allegiance --- if you want the US to lose the war in Iraq, please so state for all of us to see. It's time you show who wants to win and who wants to lose. C'mon, boys, step up to the plate. Here's your chance.
John P.
U.S. had nothing to do in Iraq in the first place. As for the withdrawal, you have to consider what will happen after that. I think the goal here for the Democrats is that U.S. young people must stop dying there. I am by no way a Dem or a Rep. I don't need them to tell me what to think.
----- Formerly MP(2) If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown
-
Mike Gaskey wrote:
see, reasonable people can compromise.
I think not. I want a complex system of suction tubes.
-
U.S. had nothing to do in Iraq in the first place. As for the withdrawal, you have to consider what will happen after that. I think the goal here for the Democrats is that U.S. young people must stop dying there. I am by no way a Dem or a Rep. I don't need them to tell me what to think.
----- Formerly MP(2) If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown
Le Centriste wrote:
U.S. had nothing to do in Iraq in the first place.
What about oil? :confused:
Le Centriste wrote:
I think the goal here for the Democrats is that U.S. young people must stop dying there.
Democrats have always looked upon the military with complete and utter disdain. Their goals have nothing to do with keeping them from dying. In fact, they're exploiting them for political gain.
-
Mike Gaskey wrote:
see, reasonable people can compromise.
I think not. I want a complex system of suction tubes.
Red Stateler wrote:
I think not. I want a complex system of suction tubes.
Well, according to Ted Stevens, the internet is already a series of tubes. All we have to do now is find some way to make the internet suck...
-
Red Stateler wrote:
I think not. I want a complex system of suction tubes.
Well, according to Ted Stevens, the internet is already a series of tubes. All we have to do now is find some way to make the internet suck...
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
All we have to do now is find some way to make the internet suck...
You're doing a pretty good job of that.
-
Red Stateler wrote:
I think not. I want a complex system of suction tubes.
Well, according to Ted Stevens, the internet is already a series of tubes. All we have to do now is find some way to make the internet suck...
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
Well, according to Ted Stevens, the internet is already a series of tubes. All we have to do now is find some way to make the internet suck...
Red's already accomplished that. ;P
Faith is a fine invention For gentlemen who see; But microscopes are prudent In an emergency! -Emily Dickinson
-
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
Well, according to Ted Stevens, the internet is already a series of tubes. All we have to do now is find some way to make the internet suck...
Red's already accomplished that. ;P
Faith is a fine invention For gentlemen who see; But microscopes are prudent In an emergency! -Emily Dickinson
Too late. I beat you. It is now you who sucks.
-
Le Centriste wrote:
U.S. had nothing to do in Iraq in the first place.
What about oil? :confused:
Le Centriste wrote:
I think the goal here for the Democrats is that U.S. young people must stop dying there.
Democrats have always looked upon the military with complete and utter disdain. Their goals have nothing to do with keeping them from dying. In fact, they're exploiting them for political gain.
... and Republicans are exploiting them for oil.
----- Formerly MP(2) If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown
-
U.S. had nothing to do in Iraq in the first place. As for the withdrawal, you have to consider what will happen after that. I think the goal here for the Democrats is that U.S. young people must stop dying there. I am by no way a Dem or a Rep. I don't need them to tell me what to think.
----- Formerly MP(2) If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown
Le Centriste wrote:
U.S. had nothing to do in Iraq in the first place.
Maybe. But considering how much the al quida goons are commited to defeating us there, I'd say we picked the right fight. We should fight them when ever and where ever they choose to oppose us. Iraq is as good a place as any to do that. Iran would be better though. Or Pakistan. Or Syria. Or Saudi Arabia.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
-
Le Centriste wrote:
U.S. had nothing to do in Iraq in the first place.
Maybe. But considering how much the al quida goons are commited to defeating us there, I'd say we picked the right fight. We should fight them when ever and where ever they choose to oppose us. Iraq is as good a place as any to do that. Iran would be better though. Or Pakistan. Or Syria. Or Saudi Arabia.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
Without any consideration for the poeple who live there and has nothing to do with this?
----- Formerly MP(2) If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown
-
jparken wrote:
Those of you who are taking the stance that the US needs to exit stay in Iraq in accordance with the Democrat Republican timetable, please step forward and claim your allegiance --- if you want the US to lose the war in Iraq more soldiers,
Hmmm, I propose you say it like this. This way it's less biased. Don't you agree? :rolleyes:
"There are II kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who understand Roman numerals." - Bassam Abdul-Baki Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
Obviously, you believe we have no obligation to stabilize the mess we made. Just cut and run, come what may, eh? Who cares how that impacts the future of the mid east, or even the U.S.. Anything to avoid even one more casualty. What a crock.
-
... and Republicans are exploiting them for oil.
----- Formerly MP(2) If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown
Le Centriste wrote:
and Republicans are exploiting them for oil.
If we were in it for the oil, we would have gone after Venezuela. Not only do they have more of it, but they're closer, have nicer scenery AND they're communist!
-
Le Centriste wrote:
U.S. had nothing to do in Iraq in the first place.
What about oil? :confused:
Le Centriste wrote:
I think the goal here for the Democrats is that U.S. young people must stop dying there.
Democrats have always looked upon the military with complete and utter disdain. Their goals have nothing to do with keeping them from dying. In fact, they're exploiting them for political gain.
Red Stateler wrote:
Democrats have always looked upon the military with complete and utter disdain.
Not historically accurate. Republicans before Nixon always accused Dems of being too trigger-happy and too eager for foreign interventionism. Dems started WWI, WWI, Korea and Vietnam.
-
Without any consideration for the poeple who live there and has nothing to do with this?
----- Formerly MP(2) If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown
Le Centriste wrote:
Without any consideration for the poeple who live there and has nothing to do with this?
You know, you're absolutely right. We should do all we can to move the battle to Canada, preferably Quebec...
-
Le Centriste wrote:
and Republicans are exploiting them for oil.
If we were in it for the oil, we would have gone after Venezuela. Not only do they have more of it, but they're closer, have nicer scenery AND they're communist!
Yeah, you're right. This one does not add up. I must rethink my argumentation.
----- Formerly MP(2) If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown
-
Le Centriste wrote:
Without any consideration for the poeple who live there and has nothing to do with this?
You know, you're absolutely right. We should do all we can to move the battle to Canada, preferably Quebec...
We have electricity...
----- Formerly MP(2) If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown