[Message Deleted]
-
quote: OK, maybe next time I should pick my swear word a little more carefully. Actually, I think your problem is not your choice of swear word, but in putting it into a phrase that accurately conveys your intended meaning. quote: Maybe I should said a piece of sh*t, or a f****ing idiot. I'm not sure that would be better. That would be the famous ad hominem fallacy. quote: You didnt answer my other question though... What, you mean this one: Is that how they teach you to argue with heretics in sunday school? That would be yet another fallacy. It's usually referred to as "poisoning the well" but it's really just another ad hominem attack. Keep at it though! Don't give up just because it's hard at first. You'll get it eventually.
Ian
You sure love findning little inconstincies in what someone writes, but just because i made a small mistake in wording something 10 posts ago does not make you say right.
Think for yourself, free from his lies, trample the cross and smash Jesus Christ. - Deicide
-
You sure love findning little inconstincies in what someone writes, but just because i made a small mistake in wording something 10 posts ago does not make you say right.
Think for yourself, free from his lies, trample the cross and smash Jesus Christ. - Deicide
quote: You sure love findning little inconstincies in what someone writes, but just because i made a small mistake in wording something 10 posts ago does not make you say right. It was clear what I assumed you meant by full of shit. If I was wrong, you could have pointed that out 10 posts ago and saved us all the trouble. Your problem is not inconsistency, it's reason.
Ian
-
quote: You sure love findning little inconstincies in what someone writes, but just because i made a small mistake in wording something 10 posts ago does not make you say right. It was clear what I assumed you meant by full of shit. If I was wrong, you could have pointed that out 10 posts ago and saved us all the trouble. Your problem is not inconsistency, it's reason.
Ian
-
You got me now. :rolleyes:
Think for yourself, free from his lies, trample the cross and smash Jesus Christ. - Deicide
Actually, I had you about 20 posts ago. ;P
Ian
-
You got me now. :rolleyes:
Think for yourself, free from his lies, trample the cross and smash Jesus Christ. - Deicide
-
You got me now. :rolleyes:
Think for yourself, free from his lies, trample the cross and smash Jesus Christ. - Deicide
Pride I guess... :-O
Ian
-
You got me now. :rolleyes:
Think for yourself, free from his lies, trample the cross and smash Jesus Christ. - Deicide
-
David Wulff wrote:
but if someone stands in the same street and tells people not to believe in a god then it is religious supression.
Do you actually believe this? Give me a break.
Ian
I don't need faith to believe it, I have seen it. Every week here in the Soapbox, and in countless tabloids. If you say anything construed to be negative about Christians you get accused of spreading hate and intolerance, yet if you say anything openly negative about athiests then all is fair game (liars, thieves, immoral, the cause of all evil, etc). No, there are no double standards here at all. Do you actually believe it isn't?
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk -
As he has said, Edmundisme is Ian. It has been common knowledge for a while because each account refers to the other poster as 'I'.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk -
I don't need faith to believe it, I have seen it. Every week here in the Soapbox, and in countless tabloids. If you say anything construed to be negative about Christians you get accused of spreading hate and intolerance, yet if you say anything openly negative about athiests then all is fair game (liars, thieves, immoral, the cause of all evil, etc). No, there are no double standards here at all. Do you actually believe it isn't?
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milkDavid Wulff wrote:
If you say anything construed to be negative about Christians you get accused of spreading hate and intolerance
Actually, you said:
David Wulff wrote:
if someone stands in the same street and tells people not to believe in a god then it is religious supression
Intolerance and supression aren't the same thing.
Ian
-
David Wulff wrote:
If you say anything construed to be negative about Christians you get accused of spreading hate and intolerance
Actually, you said:
David Wulff wrote:
if someone stands in the same street and tells people not to believe in a god then it is religious supression
Intolerance and supression aren't the same thing.
Ian
ibowler wrote:
Intolerance and supression aren't the same thing.
Tell that to Stan.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk -
Fred_Smith wrote:
Come on now, you have to accept that the whole basis of religion is faith, not reason
First I respect your thoughts even though I don't agree with them. Why do you consider faith to be antonym to reason? I believe in God, I know God exists. Proof? A Bible, witnesses of miracles, historical events. Can you prove that God does not exist?
Fred_Smith wrote:
Don’t you think it strange that the vast majority of Muslims live in Islamic countries, and vast majority of Christians live in Christian ones? And Polynesian head-hunters live in Polynesia… gosh, I wonder…
Christianity originated from the Middle East yet today Christians are minority in the region. Christianity is so diverse that it expands to all cultures, colors and regions. Do you need proof of that?
Bassam Saoud wrote:
I believe in God, I know God exists. Proof? A Bible, witnesses of miracles, historical events. Can you prove that God does not exist?
We have a few billion examples showing that people who die stay dead. We have scientific understanding of living organisms and the way they decay after death, so that the organism cannot be revived. The proposition that a being cannot be resurrected after death is about as well established as any scientific proposition could be. The Bible's claims of resurrection are thus plainly contradicted by science. That doesn't mean resurrection is an absolute impossibility, since nothing in science is 100% certain. But it does mean that anyone who respects science will require extremely solid evidence before believing in resurrection. As Carl Sagan used to say, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The evidence of the Bible doesn't come anywhere near meeting the standard. People invent lots of myths and that is a far more likely explanation for the claims of the Bible than that the miraculous events actually happened.
John Carson