Iran yaking it up again...
-
In light of the latest noise from Abdulaminajabberwokie I found this and wondered if this version of history is accurate? I couldn't find a direct link to the "click-through" history so... in firefox I click the "Launch" button under the "Slide Show - A Perilous Past" http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11497240/[^]
led mike
-
In light of the latest noise from Abdulaminajabberwokie I found this and wondered if this version of history is accurate? I couldn't find a direct link to the "click-through" history so... in firefox I click the "Launch" button under the "Slide Show - A Perilous Past" http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11497240/[^]
led mike
-
Oh who cares? Bush will bomb the crap out of them just before the end of his term and that will leave the next president to clean up the mess like neo-conmen always do. Nothing I can do about it.
Ron Paul for President of the United States of America
-
Oh who cares? Bush will bomb the crap out of them just before the end of his term and that will leave the next president to clean up the mess like neo-conmen always do. Nothing I can do about it.
Ron Paul for President of the United States of America
-
If Bush bombs Iran we will support him! Is that understood?
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
If Bush bombs Iran we will support him! Is that understood?
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
In light of the latest noise from Abdulaminajabberwokie I found this and wondered if this version of history is accurate? I couldn't find a direct link to the "click-through" history so... in firefox I click the "Launch" button under the "Slide Show - A Perilous Past" http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11497240/[^]
led mike
Why do you never hear the other side "yaking it up again", a recent article in the Guardian contained these valuable references: www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,2085195,00.html[^] “US officials say”; “a senior US official in Baghdad warned”; “The official said”; “the official said”; “the official said”; “US officials now say”; “the senior official in Baghdad said” “he [the senior official in Baghdad] added”; “the official said”; “the official said”; “he [the official] indicated; “he [the official] cited”; “a senior administration official in Washington said”; “The administration official also claimed”; “he [the administration official] said”; “US officials say”; “the senior official in Baghdad said”; “he [the senior official in Baghdad] said”; “the senior administration official said”; “he [the senior administration official] said”; “the official claimed”; ”he [the official] said”; ”Gen Petraeus’s report to the White House and Congress”; “a former Bush administration official said”; ”A senior adviser to Gen Petraeus reported”; “the adviser admitted”. No less than 26 references to official pronouncements formed the basis for a Guardian story presented with no scrutiny, no balance, no counter-evidence - nothing. Remove the verbiage described above and a Guardian front page news report becomes a straight Pentagon press release.
-
He's too damn dumb even for cannon fodder, so don't hold your breath. ;)
-- When you see the robot, drink!
-
The only way I would ever end up over there is if the government enacts the draft. If I were sent over there to fight I would fight. Shit has to get done and I wouldn't bitch and wine about it, you gotta do what you gotta do, bitch.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██