Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Hunger strike for impeachment!!

Hunger strike for impeachment!!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestion
66 Posts 17 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Chris Austin

    Le Centriste wrote:

    I am still looking for anything good that has come out of this war

    Closer relations with china :laugh:. Since they have basically paid for it.

    My Blog A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. - -Lazarus Long

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Le centriste
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    Chris Austin wrote:

    Closer relations with china

    HAHAHA That is why they send us poisoned toys and toothpaste.

    ----- If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown God is the only being who, to rule, does not need to exist. -- Charles Baudelaire

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Minosknight

      http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/08/13/BACARHF0R.DTL[^] Its so diabolical it just has to work! I just thought this was kind of silly.

      Think of it this way...using a Stradivarius violin to pound nails should not be considered a sound construction technique

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Mike Gaskey
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      I heard that some in San Fransico were so upset they were actually sewing their dicks back on in protest. Of course they're still limp.

      Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Le centriste

        Chris Austin wrote:

        Closer relations with china

        HAHAHA That is why they send us poisoned toys and toothpaste.

        ----- If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown God is the only being who, to rule, does not need to exist. -- Charles Baudelaire

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Minosknight
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Le Centriste wrote:

        That is why they send us poisoned toys and toothpaste.

        How do you poison a toy? I can imagine how you could contaminate toothpaste, but a toy? And are you insinuating that Chinese factories are doing this on purpose? Source?

        Think of it this way...using a Stradivarius violin to pound nails should not be considered a sound construction technique

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Minosknight

          Le Centriste wrote:

          That is why they send us poisoned toys and toothpaste.

          How do you poison a toy? I can imagine how you could contaminate toothpaste, but a toy? And are you insinuating that Chinese factories are doing this on purpose? Source?

          Think of it this way...using a Stradivarius violin to pound nails should not be considered a sound construction technique

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Le centriste
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Minosknight wrote:

          How do you poison a toy? I can imagine how you could contaminate toothpaste, but a toy?

          Link[^]

          Minosknight wrote:

          And are you insinuating that Chinese factories are doing this on purpose?

          Hard to tell. It seems that they learned the North American way to be able to provide low cost goods by building low quality products.

          ----- If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown God is the only being who, to rule, does not need to exist. -- Charles Baudelaire

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Stan Shannon

            The dems should certainly either impeach Bush or publically admit that all the charges against him have been nothing more than an underhanded political campaign to regain power with no concern at all for the good of the country. They should not be allowed to just let it all quietly go away as they are now trying to do. One way or another they should be forced to put their money where the mouth is.

            Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hyprocrisy is no morality at all.

            O Offline
            O Offline
            oilFactotum
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            Oh, please. It's not "quietly going away" as you claim. It is stalling as a result of vigourous administration obstruction in the form of ignoring subpoenas, expansive claims of executive privilege, deliberately vague and evasive testimony, and simple foot-dragging.

            M S 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • M Minosknight

              http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/08/13/BACARHF0R.DTL[^] Its so diabolical it just has to work! I just thought this was kind of silly.

              Think of it this way...using a Stradivarius violin to pound nails should not be considered a sound construction technique

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Dan Neely
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              Is this a real "we're going to starve to death in 3 months since bush'd veto any attempt at an early pullout even if congress passed it" hunger strike, or a "we're each taking a 1 day shift and then going back to eating again"/"we're only going to strike for a week because our doctors won't let us go longer" grandstanding event.

              -- You have to explain to them [VB coders] what you mean by "typed". their first response is likely to be something like, "Of course my code is typed. Do you think i magically project it onto the screen with the power of my mind?" --- John Simmons / outlaw programmer

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Dan Neely

                Is this a real "we're going to starve to death in 3 months since bush'd veto any attempt at an early pullout even if congress passed it" hunger strike, or a "we're each taking a 1 day shift and then going back to eating again"/"we're only going to strike for a week because our doctors won't let us go longer" grandstanding event.

                -- You have to explain to them [VB coders] what you mean by "typed". their first response is likely to be something like, "Of course my code is typed. Do you think i magically project it onto the screen with the power of my mind?" --- John Simmons / outlaw programmer

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Minosknight
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                I don't know, maybe its time we start taking bets...that is if this story is covered any further then today. I'm guessing 3 days.

                Think of it this way...using a Stradivarius violin to pound nails should not be considered a sound construction technique

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Le centriste

                  Minosknight wrote:

                  How do you poison a toy? I can imagine how you could contaminate toothpaste, but a toy?

                  Link[^]

                  Minosknight wrote:

                  And are you insinuating that Chinese factories are doing this on purpose?

                  Hard to tell. It seems that they learned the North American way to be able to provide low cost goods by building low quality products.

                  ----- If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown God is the only being who, to rule, does not need to exist. -- Charles Baudelaire

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Minosknight
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  "[Mattel]Tuesday issued a recall for 9 million toys made in China because they contain magnets that can be dislodged and swallowed" That's not poison...

                  Le Centriste wrote:

                  Hard to tell. It seems that they learned the North American way to be able to provide low cost goods by building low quality products.

                  Well they might have taken after North American car makers but I don't think they're poisoning our toothpaste in a malicious plot to "overthrow the devil, capitalist, milk-shake swirling pigs of America".

                  Think of it this way...using a Stradivarius violin to pound nails should not be considered a sound construction technique

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Minosknight

                    "[Mattel]Tuesday issued a recall for 9 million toys made in China because they contain magnets that can be dislodged and swallowed" That's not poison...

                    Le Centriste wrote:

                    Hard to tell. It seems that they learned the North American way to be able to provide low cost goods by building low quality products.

                    Well they might have taken after North American car makers but I don't think they're poisoning our toothpaste in a malicious plot to "overthrow the devil, capitalist, milk-shake swirling pigs of America".

                    Think of it this way...using a Stradivarius violin to pound nails should not be considered a sound construction technique

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Le centriste
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    Minosknight wrote:

                    That's not poison...

                    Not exactly, I have to admit, but that could lead to death. But, some of those toys were painted with paint containing lead. That is poison.

                    Minosknight wrote:

                    Well they might have taken after North American car makers but I don't think they're poisoning our toothpaste in a malicious plot to "overthrow the devil, capitalist, milk-shake swirling pigs of America".

                    How do you know?

                    ----- If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown God is the only being who, to rule, does not need to exist. -- Charles Baudelaire

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Le centriste

                      Minosknight wrote:

                      That's not poison...

                      Not exactly, I have to admit, but that could lead to death. But, some of those toys were painted with paint containing lead. That is poison.

                      Minosknight wrote:

                      Well they might have taken after North American car makers but I don't think they're poisoning our toothpaste in a malicious plot to "overthrow the devil, capitalist, milk-shake swirling pigs of America".

                      How do you know?

                      ----- If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown God is the only being who, to rule, does not need to exist. -- Charles Baudelaire

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Minosknight
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      Le Centriste wrote:

                      Not exactly, I have to admit, but that could lead to death. But, some of those toys were painted with paint containing lead. That is poison.

                      Aye, that is poison, but still I highly doubt it was painted as such to kill children.

                      Le Centriste wrote:

                      How do you know?

                      I don't know, I'm guessing they like to keep their customers though.

                      Think of it this way...using a Stradivarius violin to pound nails should not be considered a sound construction technique

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • O oilFactotum

                        Oh, please. It's not "quietly going away" as you claim. It is stalling as a result of vigourous administration obstruction in the form of ignoring subpoenas, expansive claims of executive privilege, deliberately vague and evasive testimony, and simple foot-dragging.

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mike Gaskey
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        oilFactotum wrote:

                        It is stalling as a result of vigourous administration obstruction in the form of ignoring subpoenas, expansive claims of executive privilege, deliberately vague and evasive testimony, and simple foot-dragging.

                        sounds like American politics, except this tiime the morons Dems are the noisy ones. Of course they could actually do something, but then again, they're morons Dems so all they know how to do is throw temper tantrums..

                        Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Minosknight

                          Le Centriste wrote:

                          Not exactly, I have to admit, but that could lead to death. But, some of those toys were painted with paint containing lead. That is poison.

                          Aye, that is poison, but still I highly doubt it was painted as such to kill children.

                          Le Centriste wrote:

                          How do you know?

                          I don't know, I'm guessing they like to keep their customers though.

                          Think of it this way...using a Stradivarius violin to pound nails should not be considered a sound construction technique

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Le centriste
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          Minosknight wrote:

                          I don't know, I'm guessing they like to keep their customers though.

                          Very good point.

                          ----- If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown God is the only being who, to rule, does not need to exist. -- Charles Baudelaire

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Mike Gaskey

                            oilFactotum wrote:

                            It is stalling as a result of vigourous administration obstruction in the form of ignoring subpoenas, expansive claims of executive privilege, deliberately vague and evasive testimony, and simple foot-dragging.

                            sounds like American politics, except this tiime the morons Dems are the noisy ones. Of course they could actually do something, but then again, they're morons Dems so all they know how to do is throw temper tantrums..

                            Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Minosknight
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            :-D:laugh:

                            Think of it this way...using a Stradivarius violin to pound nails should not be considered a sound construction technique

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Le centriste

                              Stan Shannon wrote:

                              with no concern at all for the good of the country

                              I am still looking for anything good that has come out of this war.

                              ----- If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown God is the only being who, to rule, does not need to exist. -- Charles Baudelaire

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Reagan Conservative
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              The fact that Saddam is no longer with us --- that's not good??? And that both of his butchering sons are also dead --- that's not good??? :confused::confused::confused:

                              John P.

                              L A 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • O oilFactotum

                                Oh, please. It's not "quietly going away" as you claim. It is stalling as a result of vigourous administration obstruction in the form of ignoring subpoenas, expansive claims of executive privilege, deliberately vague and evasive testimony, and simple foot-dragging.

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Stan Shannon
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                oilFactotum wrote:

                                It is stalling as a result of vigourous administration obstruction in the form of ignoring subpoenas, expansive claims of executive privilege, deliberately vague and evasive testimony, and simple foot-dragging.

                                Or because the dems never had anything to begin with and would now just like for it to quietly go away in time for their return to power so that they can continue doing exactly the same stuff with no one paying attention. They have been dragging 'suspects' in to iterrogate them over and over again hopeing for a mistatement of somekind so they can scream 'purjury!!!!!' regardless of any bearing on the original trumped up charges. I'm all for what ever investigations the dems want to do. Its their constitutional priviledge. But they are in a position now that they must impeach or admit the charges were never any thing but the most scurilous political which hunt in US history. They have all the constitutional authority they need to get the answers they want. They are not the helpless pawns of an all powerful overlord. If they are, than the problem is a lot bigger than George W. Bush.

                                Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hyprocrisy is no morality at all.

                                O 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Reagan Conservative

                                  The fact that Saddam is no longer with us --- that's not good??? And that both of his butchering sons are also dead --- that's not good??? :confused::confused::confused:

                                  John P.

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Le centriste
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  But, how good is it for the country? Btw, I find it very kind of Americans to have spent hundred of billions of dollars to free up the Iraqi people. Very nice of you.

                                  ----- If atheism is a religion, then not collecting stamps is a hobby. -- Unknown God is the only being who, to rule, does not need to exist. -- Charles Baudelaire

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Stan Shannon

                                    oilFactotum wrote:

                                    It is stalling as a result of vigourous administration obstruction in the form of ignoring subpoenas, expansive claims of executive privilege, deliberately vague and evasive testimony, and simple foot-dragging.

                                    Or because the dems never had anything to begin with and would now just like for it to quietly go away in time for their return to power so that they can continue doing exactly the same stuff with no one paying attention. They have been dragging 'suspects' in to iterrogate them over and over again hopeing for a mistatement of somekind so they can scream 'purjury!!!!!' regardless of any bearing on the original trumped up charges. I'm all for what ever investigations the dems want to do. Its their constitutional priviledge. But they are in a position now that they must impeach or admit the charges were never any thing but the most scurilous political which hunt in US history. They have all the constitutional authority they need to get the answers they want. They are not the helpless pawns of an all powerful overlord. If they are, than the problem is a lot bigger than George W. Bush.

                                    Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hyprocrisy is no morality at all.

                                    O Offline
                                    O Offline
                                    oilFactotum
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                                    They have been dragging 'suspects' in to iterrogate them over and over again hopeing for a mistatement of somekind so they can scream 'purjury!!!!!' regardless of any bearing on the original trumped up charges.

                                    Can you say Kenneth Star? Were you as outraged then?

                                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                                    But they are in a position now that they must impeach or admit the charges were never any thing but the most scurilous political which hunt in US history.

                                    You are a funny bunny! It is a false claim on your part to suggest that the only resolution of these investigations must be the impeachment of Bush. Illegal wiretaps, the use of the Justice Department for partisan gain or any other administration scandal is not only a constitutional priviledge but absolutely essential to the health of the constitution.

                                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                                    the most scurilous political which hunt in US history.

                                    It really is impossible to take you seriously if you think that a stained blue dress is more significant than illegal wiretaps.

                                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                                    Or because the dems never had anything

                                    Or not - as I have already said.

                                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                                    They are not the helpless pawns of an all powerful overlord.

                                    Strawman. I never said they were.

                                    M S 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • O oilFactotum

                                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                                      They have been dragging 'suspects' in to iterrogate them over and over again hopeing for a mistatement of somekind so they can scream 'purjury!!!!!' regardless of any bearing on the original trumped up charges.

                                      Can you say Kenneth Star? Were you as outraged then?

                                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                                      But they are in a position now that they must impeach or admit the charges were never any thing but the most scurilous political which hunt in US history.

                                      You are a funny bunny! It is a false claim on your part to suggest that the only resolution of these investigations must be the impeachment of Bush. Illegal wiretaps, the use of the Justice Department for partisan gain or any other administration scandal is not only a constitutional priviledge but absolutely essential to the health of the constitution.

                                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                                      the most scurilous political which hunt in US history.

                                      It really is impossible to take you seriously if you think that a stained blue dress is more significant than illegal wiretaps.

                                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                                      Or because the dems never had anything

                                      Or not - as I have already said.

                                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                                      They are not the helpless pawns of an all powerful overlord.

                                      Strawman. I never said they were.

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mike Gaskey
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      oilFactotum wrote:

                                      illegal wiretaps

                                      what a fucking joke - all blather, no proof just typical moronic democrat squeeling. how about someone way over there on the left actually do something instead of beating that hollow drum.

                                      Mike The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • O oilFactotum

                                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                                        They have been dragging 'suspects' in to iterrogate them over and over again hopeing for a mistatement of somekind so they can scream 'purjury!!!!!' regardless of any bearing on the original trumped up charges.

                                        Can you say Kenneth Star? Were you as outraged then?

                                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                                        But they are in a position now that they must impeach or admit the charges were never any thing but the most scurilous political which hunt in US history.

                                        You are a funny bunny! It is a false claim on your part to suggest that the only resolution of these investigations must be the impeachment of Bush. Illegal wiretaps, the use of the Justice Department for partisan gain or any other administration scandal is not only a constitutional priviledge but absolutely essential to the health of the constitution.

                                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                                        the most scurilous political which hunt in US history.

                                        It really is impossible to take you seriously if you think that a stained blue dress is more significant than illegal wiretaps.

                                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                                        Or because the dems never had anything

                                        Or not - as I have already said.

                                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                                        They are not the helpless pawns of an all powerful overlord.

                                        Strawman. I never said they were.

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Stan Shannon
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        oilFactotum wrote:

                                        Can you say Kenneth Star? Were you as outraged then?

                                        oilFactotum wrote:

                                        if you think that a stained blue dress is more significant than illegal wiretaps.

                                        Except that the stained dress really existed and Clinton really did lie to a grand jury about it. I think Ken Starr's investigation was entirely justified and, as I said, I think the current investigations are justified. That is an important congressional responsibility. But the dems have crawled out to the end of a very long branch. I just want someone to saw it off before they come slinking back in the dark of night. (For what its worth I give the government permission to wire tap my phone any time they please. I care no more for someone listening to my phone calls than I do someone over hearing any conversation I might have in public. The entire concept of a 'constutional right to a private phone call' is one of the most pathetically stupid rights I've ever heard discussed. Especially considering the possiblity that lives might be saved by doing it.)

                                        oilFactotum wrote:

                                        Illegal wiretaps, the use of the Justice Department for partisan gain or any other administration scandal is not only a constitutional priviledge but absolutely essential to the health of the constitution.

                                        Oh, please impeach Bush for that. Please oh please oh please... Be a man! stand up for your principles. Bush is a scoundral, a reprobate. He is pure evil! He should be impeached! Go for it! Demand it of your representatives! Why else did you vote for them?

                                        oilFactotum wrote:

                                        Strawman. I never said they were.

                                        Than wht the hell is their problem? Surely if it is such a slam dunk case, they should be able to find someone to spill the beans ... unless Bush is an all powerful overlord after all.

                                        Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hyprocrisy is no morality at all.

                                        O 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Stan Shannon

                                          oilFactotum wrote:

                                          Can you say Kenneth Star? Were you as outraged then?

                                          oilFactotum wrote:

                                          if you think that a stained blue dress is more significant than illegal wiretaps.

                                          Except that the stained dress really existed and Clinton really did lie to a grand jury about it. I think Ken Starr's investigation was entirely justified and, as I said, I think the current investigations are justified. That is an important congressional responsibility. But the dems have crawled out to the end of a very long branch. I just want someone to saw it off before they come slinking back in the dark of night. (For what its worth I give the government permission to wire tap my phone any time they please. I care no more for someone listening to my phone calls than I do someone over hearing any conversation I might have in public. The entire concept of a 'constutional right to a private phone call' is one of the most pathetically stupid rights I've ever heard discussed. Especially considering the possiblity that lives might be saved by doing it.)

                                          oilFactotum wrote:

                                          Illegal wiretaps, the use of the Justice Department for partisan gain or any other administration scandal is not only a constitutional priviledge but absolutely essential to the health of the constitution.

                                          Oh, please impeach Bush for that. Please oh please oh please... Be a man! stand up for your principles. Bush is a scoundral, a reprobate. He is pure evil! He should be impeached! Go for it! Demand it of your representatives! Why else did you vote for them?

                                          oilFactotum wrote:

                                          Strawman. I never said they were.

                                          Than wht the hell is their problem? Surely if it is such a slam dunk case, they should be able to find someone to spill the beans ... unless Bush is an all powerful overlord after all.

                                          Nothing in the entire universe is more useless than morality without authority. A morality free of hyprocrisy is no morality at all.

                                          O Offline
                                          O Offline
                                          oilFactotum
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          really existed

                                          And so did the illegal wiretaps.

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          Clinton really did lie

                                          I never said he didn't. You were the one crying about perjury traps and investigations run amok.

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          I think the current investigations are justified.

                                          Of course, I should have realized that was what you meant when you said this

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          They have been dragging 'suspects' in to iterrogate them over and over again hopeing for a mistatement of somekind so they can scream 'purjury!!!!!' regardless of any bearing on the original trumped up charges.

                                          and this

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          were never any thing but the most scurilous political which hunt in US history.

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          For what its worth I give the government permission to wire tap my phone any time they please.

                                          Well, you can bend over and take from big brother, I'm not interested.

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          He should be impeached!

                                          It's funny how you are always demanding that.

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          Than wht the hell is their problem?

                                          I've always assumed you never bother to read anything before you reply. You simply respond to what your preconceived notions expect me to say. I've already stated several of the foot-dragging techniques used by this administration.

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          unless Bush is an all powerful overlord after all.

                                          It must really chap your ass that he isn't.

                                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups