Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Weird and The Wonderful
  4. #if NOT_USED

#if NOT_USED

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Weird and The Wonderful
help
14 Posts 7 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P pbraun

    In my recent quests to solve an issue with legacy code, I found several places where code blocks are wrapped in #if NOT_USED ... #endif This is confusing to me since if NOT_USED is defined, then the code will be compiled into the project.

    Phil

    P Offline
    P Offline
    PIEBALDconsult
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Indeed, should be #if 0 or #if false or something.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P pbraun

      In my recent quests to solve an issue with legacy code, I found several places where code blocks are wrapped in #if NOT_USED ... #endif This is confusing to me since if NOT_USED is defined, then the code will be compiled into the project.

      Phil

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chris Meech
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Sounds like someone's not using version control on the source, or if they are, they are afraid of using the delete key to actually remove the code. I find this to be the least confusing way of ensuring that code is not compiled into a project. :)

      Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]

      P P 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • C Chris Meech

        Sounds like someone's not using version control on the source, or if they are, they are afraid of using the delete key to actually remove the code. I find this to be the least confusing way of ensuring that code is not compiled into a project. :)

        Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]

        P Offline
        P Offline
        Pete OHanlon
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Don't get technical with your new fangled ways. I'm just surprised he didn't use a hex editor on the compiled code.

        Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Meech

          Sounds like someone's not using version control on the source, or if they are, they are afraid of using the delete key to actually remove the code. I find this to be the least confusing way of ensuring that code is not compiled into a project. :)

          Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]

          P Offline
          P Offline
          PIEBALDconsult
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          I think the point is that NOT_USED could be defined at some point, and hose things up.

          C P J 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • P PIEBALDconsult

            I think the point is that NOT_USED could be defined at some point, and hose things up.

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Chris Meech
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            You're correct and I understood that point. But, I see that my response could be mis-interpreted from that. For me, if I want to ensure that code is not compiled, I prefer to use the delete key and depend upon source control to preserve the code. :)

            Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]

            P P 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • C Chris Meech

              You're correct and I understood that point. But, I see that my response could be mis-interpreted from that. For me, if I want to ensure that code is not compiled, I prefer to use the delete key and depend upon source control to preserve the code. :)

              Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]

              P Offline
              P Offline
              Pete OHanlon
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Chris Meech wrote:

              depend upon source control to preserve the code

              Well, as long as it's not VSS.

              Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Meech

                You're correct and I understood that point. But, I see that my response could be mis-interpreted from that. For me, if I want to ensure that code is not compiled, I prefer to use the delete key and depend upon source control to preserve the code. :)

                Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]

                P Offline
                P Offline
                PIEBALDconsult
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Yes, delete is good for the soul.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P PIEBALDconsult

                  I think the point is that NOT_USED could be defined at some point, and hose things up.

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  pbraun
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Actually the point is that there are many other ways to exclude code from being compiled, but using #ifdef NOT_USED creates confusion as to the intentions of the original developer. I prefer to be perfectly clear if I don't want the code compiled and either comment it out (with an explanation) or delete it entirely.

                  Phil

                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P pbraun

                    In my recent quests to solve an issue with legacy code, I found several places where code blocks are wrapped in #if NOT_USED ... #endif This is confusing to me since if NOT_USED is defined, then the code will be compiled into the project.

                    Phil

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Russell
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    One year ago:

                    BOOL IsFalse;
                    ...
                    IsFalse=FALSE;
                    ...
                    if(IsFalse){
                    ...
                    }

                    :omg::wtf::eek::wtf::omg: :((:((


                    Russell

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Russell

                      One year ago:

                      BOOL IsFalse;
                      ...
                      IsFalse=FALSE;
                      ...
                      if(IsFalse){
                      ...
                      }

                      :omg::wtf::eek::wtf::omg: :((:((


                      Russell

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lutoslaw
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      The programmer who wrote it must suffered from depression... I would rather use IsTrue - it's definately more optimistic, isn't it?

                      Greetings - Gajatko Portable.NET is part of DotGNU, a project to build a complete Free Software replacement for .NET - a system that truly belongs to the developers.

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lutoslaw

                        The programmer who wrote it must suffered from depression... I would rather use IsTrue - it's definately more optimistic, isn't it?

                        Greetings - Gajatko Portable.NET is part of DotGNU, a project to build a complete Free Software replacement for .NET - a system that truly belongs to the developers.

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Russell
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        gajatko wrote:

                        t's definately more optimistic

                        for sure!:laugh::laugh: I simply modifyed the variable name to

                        BOOL Flag;

                        :~ there wasn't absolutly any reason to give it a name:-O


                        Russell

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P PIEBALDconsult

                          I think the point is that NOT_USED could be defined at some point, and hose things up.

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jibalt
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          There are lots of moronic things people can do to hose things up ... defining NOT_USED is just one of them. It could be called DONT_DEFINE_THIS_BECAUSE_IT_EXCLUDES_CODE_THAT_SHOULD_NOT_BE_COMPILED and one could just as well define that.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P pbraun

                            Actually the point is that there are many other ways to exclude code from being compiled, but using #ifdef NOT_USED creates confusion as to the intentions of the original developer. I prefer to be perfectly clear if I don't want the code compiled and either comment it out (with an explanation) or delete it entirely.

                            Phil

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            jibalt
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            It only confuses stupid people.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups