Well why didn't yall think of this sooner...
-
Red Stateler wrote:
Agnosticism is the lack of a belief in general. Atheism is the belief that there is no God.
No, actually one has to do with knowledge; the other with belief. So the two can be combined: Gnostic Theists know God exists so they believe in him. Agnostic Theists don't know if God exists but believe in him anyway. Gnostic Atheists know God doesn't exist so they don't believe in him. Agnostic Atheists don't God if God exists but they don't believe in him.
Man is a marvelous curiosity ... he thinks he is the Creator's pet ... he even believes the Creator loves him; has a passion for him; sits up nights to admire him; yes and watch over him and keep him out of trouble. He prays to him and thinks He listens. Isn't it a quaint idea. - Mark Twain
-
Red Stateler wrote:
Agnosticism is the lack of a belief in general. Atheism is the belief that there is no God.
No, actually one has to do with knowledge; the other with belief. So the two can be combined: Gnostic Theists know God exists so they believe in him. Agnostic Theists don't know if God exists but believe in him anyway. Gnostic Atheists know God doesn't exist so they don't believe in him. Agnostic Atheists don't God if God exists but they don't believe in him.
Man is a marvelous curiosity ... he thinks he is the Creator's pet ... he even believes the Creator loves him; has a passion for him; sits up nights to admire him; yes and watch over him and keep him out of trouble. He prays to him and thinks He listens. Isn't it a quaint idea. - Mark Twain
Al Beback wrote:
No, actually one has to do with knowledge; the other with belief. So the two can be combined:
I didn't address "knowledge". I addressed belief. Both atheists and agnostics (as well as the vast majority of theists) believe that proof of the existence of God and therefore knowledge of His existence is unattainable unless God chooses to reveal Himself. Atheists, regardless of whether you incorrectly regard them as a special breed of agnostic or gnostic, straightforwardly believe that there is no God (they cannot "know" there is no God). Agnostics, on the other hand, are uncertain and choose to adhere to no belief as to whether or not God exists. Thus their "belief system" (or rather lack thereof) allows for the existence or nonexistence of God. The atheist belief system (note that it is not in quotes) does not. Since one cannot "know" if God exists or not, it follows that your definitions must be erroneous.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX wrote:
I am willing to bet you are atheistic in regards to all other religions besides your favorite one
Your assumption is wrong.
INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX wrote:
I bet you are even skeptical of their magic stories.
And yet you lost another bet.
INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX wrote:
(besides intelligence and typing skills)
Thanks for the personal remarks, show me you maturity so I don't have to wonder. As far as typing, didn't realize you were grading.
INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX wrote:
The only difference between you and Atheists ... is that they are that way towards all religions.
religion[^]: 4 : a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith 2 : a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices Does that include atheism. atheism[^]: b : the doctrine that there is no deity A difference of beliefs.
God Bless, Jason
God doesn't believe in atheist but He still loves them and INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX too.It's funny how you use the religious man's definition of atheism. Why can't you man in the cloud believers ever get through your skull that atheism isn't the belief in something's non-existence, but the lack of belief in its existence?
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
-
jason_lakewhitney wrote:
Well this definitely opens up some problems for a few folks.
Why? There's no jurisdiction.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
Trial in absentia.
-
It's funny how you use the religious man's definition of atheism. Why can't you man in the cloud believers ever get through your skull that atheism isn't the belief in something's non-existence, but the lack of belief in its existence?
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
Why can't you man in the cloud believers ever get through your skull that atheism isn't the belief in something's non-existence, but the lack of belief in its existence?
Whereas theism is the lack of belief is God's nonexistence. :rolleyes:
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
It's funny how you use the religious man's definition of atheism. Why can't you man in the cloud believers ever get through your skull that atheism isn't the belief in something's non-existence, but the lack of belief in its existence?
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
isn't the belief in something's non-existence
So as to say: An atheist believes that God doesn't exist.
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
but the lack of belief in its existence
An atheist believes there isn't a God.
God Bless, Jason
God doesn't believe in atheist but He still loves them and INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX too. -
Trial in absentia.
73Zeppelin wrote:
Trial in absentia.
That has nothing to do with jurisdiction. Laws governing murder and theft don't apply to dogs. Only humans.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
73Zeppelin wrote:
Trial in absentia.
That has nothing to do with jurisdiction. Laws governing murder and theft don't apply to dogs. Only humans.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
God made man in his own image; or so the story goes...
-
God made man in his own image; or so the story goes...
73Zeppelin wrote:
God made man in his own image; or so the story goes...
US law also doesn't apply to foreign dignitaries.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
isn't the belief in something's non-existence
So as to say: An atheist believes that God doesn't exist.
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
but the lack of belief in its existence
An atheist believes there isn't a God.
God Bless, Jason
God doesn't believe in atheist but He still loves them and INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX too.No. An atheist lacks the belief in the existence of god. However, atheists tends to be rational, so they often point out the fact that there are no evidence of any god's existence. Hence, they often believe there is no god. But still - atheism isn't the belief that something doesn't exist. It's the lack of belief that something exists. It does require a bit of thinking to understand. Please don't strain your brain.
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
-
No. An atheist lacks the belief in the existence of god. However, atheists tends to be rational, so they often point out the fact that there are no evidence of any god's existence. Hence, they often believe there is no god. But still - atheism isn't the belief that something doesn't exist. It's the lack of belief that something exists. It does require a bit of thinking to understand. Please don't strain your brain.
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
The dictionary[^] disagrees with your squirming attempt to dereligionize atheism.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
No. An atheist lacks the belief in the existence of god. However, atheists tends to be rational, so they often point out the fact that there are no evidence of any god's existence. Hence, they often believe there is no god. But still - atheism isn't the belief that something doesn't exist. It's the lack of belief that something exists. It does require a bit of thinking to understand. Please don't strain your brain.
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
However, atheists tends to be rational, so they often point out the fact that there are no evidence of any god's existence. Hence, they often believe there is no god.
:laugh: How is that "rational"? Lack of evidence denotes lack of existence? :omg:
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
73Zeppelin wrote:
God made man in his own image; or so the story goes...
US law also doesn't apply to foreign dignitaries.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
It doesn't apply to Frenchmen either, but that hasn't stopped me from financially neutering the despicable blob of humanity that I'm renting my apartment from. So rather than debating here, I've been occupied teaching him why it's not a good idea to screw with me. Tonight, however, has brought some good news - I've just cost him many thousands of Euros. I'm having a beer in light of it. He's probably having a crying session. Unfortunately for him that's just round 1. I'm not anywhere near finished with him. In some circles they call it "being taken to the cleaners".
-
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
However, atheists tends to be rational, so they often point out the fact that there are no evidence of any god's existence. Hence, they often believe there is no god.
:laugh: How is that "rational"? Lack of evidence denotes lack of existence? :omg:
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
You seem to be lacking in your word twisting abilities. Are you off your meds?
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
-
No. An atheist lacks the belief in the existence of god. However, atheists tends to be rational, so they often point out the fact that there are no evidence of any god's existence. Hence, they often believe there is no god. But still - atheism isn't the belief that something doesn't exist. It's the lack of belief that something exists. It does require a bit of thinking to understand. Please don't strain your brain.
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
However, atheists tends to be rational, so they often point out the fact that there are no evidence of any god's existence.
In the opinion of Joergen, what would be evidence of God's existence, or any other god?
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
It's the lack of belief that something exists.
So considering that evidence that God does or does not exist is irrelevant. An atheist choses to say that they have no belief in the existence or nonexistence of God. Because if God exist then there is a Hell and they realize that they should live accordingly to avoid Hell and the if God doesn't exist then their life is meaningless and everyone and everything they have ever loved was pointless and that they in all honestly do desire the existence of God.
God Bless, Jason
God doesn't believe in atheist but He still loves them and INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX too. -
You seem to be lacking in your word twisting abilities. Are you off your meds?
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
You seem to be lacking in your word twisting abilities.
I didn't twist words. I de-twisted yours.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
However, atheists tends to be rational, so they often point out the fact that there are no evidence of any god's existence.
In the opinion of Joergen, what would be evidence of God's existence, or any other god?
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
It's the lack of belief that something exists.
So considering that evidence that God does or does not exist is irrelevant. An atheist choses to say that they have no belief in the existence or nonexistence of God. Because if God exist then there is a Hell and they realize that they should live accordingly to avoid Hell and the if God doesn't exist then their life is meaningless and everyone and everything they have ever loved was pointless and that they in all honestly do desire the existence of God.
God Bless, Jason
God doesn't believe in atheist but He still loves them and INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX too.Do you actually make decisions based on the belief that you would go to hell? That doesn't really seem to really mesh with what I picked up as the spirit of Christianity. It always seemed to be more about wanting to get closer to god, not fearing what he might do to you if you don't measure up. How does the existence of some bearded guy give life a point? It always seemed a matter of personal fulfillment even to the faithful.
This blanket smells like ham
-
You are trying in corporate all of the stories and all religions into one question. And that is not what I said. You are also trying to get me to say I am something I am not. I am not a polytheist. Please try again later.
God Bless, Jason
God doesn't believe in atheist but He still loves them and INITCOMMONCONTROLSEX too. -
Al Beback wrote:
No, actually one has to do with knowledge; the other with belief. So the two can be combined:
I didn't address "knowledge". I addressed belief. Both atheists and agnostics (as well as the vast majority of theists) believe that proof of the existence of God and therefore knowledge of His existence is unattainable unless God chooses to reveal Himself. Atheists, regardless of whether you incorrectly regard them as a special breed of agnostic or gnostic, straightforwardly believe that there is no God (they cannot "know" there is no God). Agnostics, on the other hand, are uncertain and choose to adhere to no belief as to whether or not God exists. Thus their "belief system" (or rather lack thereof) allows for the existence or nonexistence of God. The atheist belief system (note that it is not in quotes) does not. Since one cannot "know" if God exists or not, it follows that your definitions must be erroneous.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
Red Stateler wrote:
Since one cannot "know" if God exists or not, it follows that your definitions must be erroneous.
First of all, I didn't make up the definitions. Do a little research, starting with the definition of agnostic[^]. Second of all, some people claim to know that there's a God. They've "felt him in their heart", or "seen him performing miracles on TV". Those are the gnostic theists. Most theists are actually agnostic though, as you pointed out. They believe despite having no knowledge. Then there are gnostic atheists, who claim to know with a high degree of certainty that God does not exist. They base their knowledge on lack of evidence and logic (eg., I know leprechauns don't exist, so I don't believe in them). And finally, there are agnostic atheists, which is where most atheists fall. They don't know if there's a God, so they prefer not believing in him.
Man is a marvelous curiosity ... he thinks he is the Creator's pet ... he even believes the Creator loves him; has a passion for him; sits up nights to admire him; yes and watch over him and keep him out of trouble. He prays to him and thinks He listens. Isn't it a quaint idea. - Mark Twain
-
It's funny how you use the religious man's definition of atheism. Why can't you man in the cloud believers ever get through your skull that atheism isn't the belief in something's non-existence, but the lack of belief in its existence?
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
If your position truly is one of lack of belief, rather than belief that God doesn't exist. Why do you stoop to the position of calling believers stupid? If you didn't believe that God doesn't exist, why try to convince others of your non-belief?
This statement was never false.