Is mfc still popular now?
-
I want to know that is mfc still popular now?Shall I make an approach to it? who can give me some advice?
That's like asking a VB'er if 1 + 1 is 2
Waldermort
-
I want to know that is mfc still popular now?Shall I make an approach to it? who can give me some advice?
MFC is still popular, but no so much as C#. I still use it on a daily basis, mostly for real-time stuff. Anything .NET can't hold a flame to C++ speed wise.
I get all the news I need from the weather report - Paul Simon (from "The Only Living Boy in New York")
-
MFC is still popular, but no so much as C#. I still use it on a daily basis, mostly for real-time stuff. Anything .NET can't hold a flame to C++ speed wise.
I get all the news I need from the weather report - Paul Simon (from "The Only Living Boy in New York")
Justin Perez wrote:
MFC is still popular, but no so much as C#.
How in the world could you possibly know such a thing? :rolleyes: Have you polled everyone, or at least a representative sample?
"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
-
MFC is still popular, but no so much as C#. I still use it on a daily basis, mostly for real-time stuff. Anything .NET can't hold a flame to C++ speed wise.
I get all the news I need from the weather report - Paul Simon (from "The Only Living Boy in New York")
Thank you for answering my questions.Can you give me some tips for learning MFC & C#,like recommanding some good books for read,it must be very famous so I can get it easily.
-
I want to know that is mfc still popular now?Shall I make an approach to it? who can give me some advice?
-
Just recommand me some good books ,I know C++ but never used MFC,I need a book for me to start this journey.Thank you again!
-
I want to know that is mfc still popular now?Shall I make an approach to it? who can give me some advice?
Microsoft Foundation Classes(MFC) Library is created with Microsoft that customize win32 library(if you remember Win32 was for c and it has some limited) and insert some things to it.
-
Thank you for answering my questions.Can you give me some tips for learning MFC & C#,like recommanding some good books for read,it must be very famous so I can get it easily.
Jeff Prosise, "Programming Windows with MFC", Microsoft Press It's the one standard compendium. Old, but good.
Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not money, I am become as a sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.
George Orwell, "Keep the Aspidistra Flying", Opening words -
Justin Perez wrote:
MFC is still popular, but no so much as C#.
How in the world could you possibly know such a thing? :rolleyes: Have you polled everyone, or at least a representative sample?
"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
DavidCrow wrote:
How in the world could you possibly know such a thing? Have you polled everyone, or at least a representative sample?
From the weather report, of course! :-D
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
-
Microsoft Foundation Classes(MFC) Library is created with Microsoft that customize win32 library(if you remember Win32 was for c and it has some limited) and insert some things to it.
Why does that answer to the OP question ? Furthermore, your answer is not really correct. First, win32 is not for C. It has a C API but that doesn't mean that you need to write C code to use it. And it doesn't really have some limitations: everything you can do with MFC, you can do that with the win32 API also (of course, this will probably much more time, but still). Second, MFC are basically wrapper classes around the win32 API, which mean they don't really add functionality, they just provide a OO wrapper.
Cédric Moonen Software developer
Charting control [v1.2] -
Thank you for answering my questions.Can you give me some tips for learning MFC & C#,like recommanding some good books for read,it must be very famous so I can get it easily.
bornunique wrote:
...so I can get it easily.
Are you allergic to work?
"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
-
Why does that answer to the OP question ? Furthermore, your answer is not really correct. First, win32 is not for C. It has a C API but that doesn't mean that you need to write C code to use it. And it doesn't really have some limitations: everything you can do with MFC, you can do that with the win32 API also (of course, this will probably much more time, but still). Second, MFC are basically wrapper classes around the win32 API, which mean they don't really add functionality, they just provide a OO wrapper.
Cédric Moonen Software developer
Charting control [v1.2]Win32 Library and Win32 was written in c not for C++,MFC was originaly a customize of Win32 then it inserting object orientation(for example classes) to it also support of somethings was little in it.
-
Why does that answer to the OP question ? Furthermore, your answer is not really correct. First, win32 is not for C. It has a C API but that doesn't mean that you need to write C code to use it. And it doesn't really have some limitations: everything you can do with MFC, you can do that with the win32 API also (of course, this will probably much more time, but still). Second, MFC are basically wrapper classes around the win32 API, which mean they don't really add functionality, they just provide a OO wrapper.
Cédric Moonen Software developer
Charting control [v1.2]Cedric Moonen wrote:
First, win32 is not for C.
It is. You can call it from C++ (due to the inherent backward-compatibility), but it is a simple C-API. Quite old fasioned C, that is. No object orientation or interfaces or derivation like e.g. GTK+ has.
Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not money, I am become as a sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.
George Orwell, "Keep the Aspidistra Flying", Opening words -
Justin Perez wrote:
MFC is still popular, but no so much as C#.
How in the world could you possibly know such a thing? :rolleyes: Have you polled everyone, or at least a representative sample?
"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
I agree with your point. Though I have no doubt it is true, for the script kiddies outnumber the rest of us by ????, I don't know but it's a lot! For them C# is the new VB and like the old VB will of course be more popular with them than C++. If the noise here on CP is any indication the script kiddie numbers are growing at an alarming rate.
-
Thank you for answering my questions.Can you give me some tips for learning MFC & C#,like recommanding some good books for read,it must be very famous so I can get it easily.
-
I agree with your point. Though I have no doubt it is true, for the script kiddies outnumber the rest of us by ????, I don't know but it's a lot! For them C# is the new VB and like the old VB will of course be more popular with them than C++. If the noise here on CP is any indication the script kiddie numbers are growing at an alarming rate.
led mike wrote:
If the noise here on CP is any indication the script kiddie numbers are growing at an alarming rate.
I once asked a transmission mechanic what make of vehicle he saw the most of in his shop. Without hesitation, he said it was Chrysler* vehicles. That could be interpreted in one of two ways: 1) Chrysler makes an inferior product, or 2) there are more Chrysler vehicles on the road than comparable models, so it stands to reason that more Chrysler vehicles will be in the shop than others. Therefore, GM could have an equally faulty vehicle, but if there are less of them on the road, statistically there will also be less of them in the shop, but that is no indicator that they are a better vehicle. * The argument could be made for any make, not just Chrysler.
"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
-
led mike wrote:
If the noise here on CP is any indication the script kiddie numbers are growing at an alarming rate.
I once asked a transmission mechanic what make of vehicle he saw the most of in his shop. Without hesitation, he said it was Chrysler* vehicles. That could be interpreted in one of two ways: 1) Chrysler makes an inferior product, or 2) there are more Chrysler vehicles on the road than comparable models, so it stands to reason that more Chrysler vehicles will be in the shop than others. Therefore, GM could have an equally faulty vehicle, but if there are less of them on the road, statistically there will also be less of them in the shop, but that is no indicator that they are a better vehicle. * The argument could be made for any make, not just Chrysler.
"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
DavidCrow wrote:
That could be interpreted in one of two ways: 1) Chrysler makes an inferior product, or 2) there are more Chrysler vehicles on the road than comparable models
So that horrible analogy means that you can't tell if their numbers are growing by the posts here on CP? What about the comp.lang.C++ news group?
-
I want to know that is mfc still popular now?Shall I make an approach to it? who can give me some advice?
-
DavidCrow wrote:
That could be interpreted in one of two ways: 1) Chrysler makes an inferior product, or 2) there are more Chrysler vehicles on the road than comparable models
So that horrible analogy means that you can't tell if their numbers are growing by the posts here on CP? What about the comp.lang.C++ news group?
led mike wrote:
...you can't tell if their numbers are growing by the posts here on CP?
There may very well be an equal number of "C++" members but they are just not posting, or they are posting at a time when you and I are offline. My point is, you can't tell about one simply because of the apparent lack of the other.
"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
-
I want to know that is mfc still popular now?Shall I make an approach to it? who can give me some advice?
My advice would be to look at what you want to do and then examine which language and/or framework is best for the job. Do some research. Only you can know what's appropriate. Your decision should be based on what the best tool for the job is and not the tool's popularity. MFC, as mentioned in other posts, is a semi-object-oriented, C++ wrapper around the Win32 APIs. If Win32 is what you want to use for your Windows development, and C++ is your language of choice (or the language you already know) then MFC is certainly an option. MFC is still supported by Microsoft. There's new stuff added for VS 2008, and there will be more new stuff added in the next Visual Studio version after that. Look into the .NET languages as well. The .NET framework provides many more "canned" solutions to common programming tasks than MFC ever will. Just my 2 cents... Good luck! Mark
Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java: