access c: drive
-
p_ wrote:
please tell me how to access c: drive of other system in network from my system
\\SYSTEM_NAME\\c$ is of any help!
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixturecheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/IV Support CRY- Child Relief and You
ThatsAlok wrote:
\\SYSTEM_NAME\\c$
If that works, someone needs to be hit on the head. With a club. Hard and fast. Multiple times. And again. And again. If you or he starts to like it, keep on. He deserves it. This old security-hole should have been closed for years now... -- modified at 11:03 Thursday 25th October, 2007
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency" -
ThatsAlok wrote:
\\SYSTEM_NAME\\c$
If that works, someone needs to be hit on the head. With a club. Hard and fast. Multiple times. And again. And again. If you or he starts to like it, keep on. He deserves it. This old security-hole should have been closed for years now... -- modified at 11:03 Thursday 25th October, 2007
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"What on earth are you waffling on about? The only security hole is access rights on the remote machine, which by default are extremely limited.
Waldermort
-
ThatsAlok wrote:
\\SYSTEM_NAME\\c$
If that works, someone needs to be hit on the head. With a club. Hard and fast. Multiple times. And again. And again. If you or he starts to like it, keep on. He deserves it. This old security-hole should have been closed for years now... -- modified at 11:03 Thursday 25th October, 2007
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"jhwurmbach wrote:
If that works, someone needs to be hit on the head. With a club. Hard and fast. Multiple times. And again. And again. If you or he starts to like it, keep on. He deserves it.
have you ever work on network!? \\SYSTEM_NAME\\c$ is still available except now you have to provide username and password.
-
What on earth are you waffling on about? The only security hole is access rights on the remote machine, which by default are extremely limited.
Waldermort
If you think that accessing your CEOs (or any coworker for that matter) C: (D:, E:, F:...-Drive is not a security-hole, I think no one can help you.
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency" -
jhwurmbach wrote:
If that works, someone needs to be hit on the head. With a club. Hard and fast. Multiple times. And again. And again. If you or he starts to like it, keep on. He deserves it.
have you ever work on network!? \\SYSTEM_NAME\\c$ is still available except now you have to provide username and password.
Oh - thats new, then. The hole is closed here for years, now. In XP you still could access anything not hidden well enough. E.G. Your bosses USB-Stick (FAT-Formated as it is).
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency" -
Oh - thats new, then. The hole is closed here for years, now. In XP you still could access anything not hidden well enough. E.G. Your bosses USB-Stick (FAT-Formated as it is).
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"jhwurmbach wrote:
Oh - thats new, then. The hole is closed here for years, now.
i don't understand ... what you want to say!
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixturecheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/IV Support CRY- Child Relief and You
-
jhwurmbach wrote:
Oh - thats new, then. The hole is closed here for years, now.
i don't understand ... what you want to say!
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixturecheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/IV Support CRY- Child Relief and You
OK, again slowly: Until recently, even in XP (I think), you could scan all mounted drives on all computers in the local windows-network (that is anything up until the next network router). Anything between you and full access was the Windows file security. Non-existant e.g. on USB-Sticks. That IS a security hole. Regardless what Microsoft-cultists say. This could have been switched off in the registry. See here[^]. Our network policy enforces this. Now you tell me, that this no longer the case. Fine. It should have been never. And the ones responsible for that need to be disgraced until their fourth decendant.
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency" -
OK, again slowly: Until recently, even in XP (I think), you could scan all mounted drives on all computers in the local windows-network (that is anything up until the next network router). Anything between you and full access was the Windows file security. Non-existant e.g. on USB-Sticks. That IS a security hole. Regardless what Microsoft-cultists say. This could have been switched off in the registry. See here[^]. Our network policy enforces this. Now you tell me, that this no longer the case. Fine. It should have been never. And the ones responsible for that need to be disgraced until their fourth decendant.
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"As an owner of a small local area network with only 3 PC's in it all on my desktop I am glad this feature exists it makes it so much easier.
-
As an owner of a small local area network with only 3 PC's in it all on my desktop I am glad this feature exists it makes it so much easier.
Easier than just creating a real share where you need it?
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency" -
Easier than just creating a real share where you need it?
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"well actually no, because I know how to use Net Share from the commandline, but yes if all I had was the poxy windows folder share prpoerty sheet it is much easier because the property sheet sharing page wants to reset all permissions on every thing below the share point which is totally unneccessary in a desktop lan environment.