Component1 vs Infragistics vs Syncfusion
-
Hi, Has anybody done a comparison between these 3 component suites? I need to pick one to integrate in my Windows-based app (the app has UI galore). After a quick glance, C1 doesn't seem very structured (has a lot of do-it-all components - the FlexGrid can also do Trees), whereas Infragistics and Syncfusion seem better layed out (I really like Syncfusion's docking manager). Most likely I'll have to write small apps with each suite to figure out if they have what I need (for example listView drag'n drop is a big one, because now I'm using XCeed and their drag'n drop is a joke), but I thought I'd ask others what's their take on this (speed, feature set, memory footprint, stuff like that). If you haven't compared them, but are currently using one of them, please tell me what you think of it. thanx
-
Hi, Has anybody done a comparison between these 3 component suites? I need to pick one to integrate in my Windows-based app (the app has UI galore). After a quick glance, C1 doesn't seem very structured (has a lot of do-it-all components - the FlexGrid can also do Trees), whereas Infragistics and Syncfusion seem better layed out (I really like Syncfusion's docking manager). Most likely I'll have to write small apps with each suite to figure out if they have what I need (for example listView drag'n drop is a big one, because now I'm using XCeed and their drag'n drop is a joke), but I thought I'd ask others what's their take on this (speed, feature set, memory footprint, stuff like that). If you haven't compared them, but are currently using one of them, please tell me what you think of it. thanx
I don't have any experience with the other two, but I have used Infragistics for both web and windows apps. I would look for something else. Infragisitics has poor documentation and customer support, it seemed to me as though their controls were carelessly rushed to market with the hope that they could be fixed with service packs.
only two letters away from being an asset
-
Hi, Has anybody done a comparison between these 3 component suites? I need to pick one to integrate in my Windows-based app (the app has UI galore). After a quick glance, C1 doesn't seem very structured (has a lot of do-it-all components - the FlexGrid can also do Trees), whereas Infragistics and Syncfusion seem better layed out (I really like Syncfusion's docking manager). Most likely I'll have to write small apps with each suite to figure out if they have what I need (for example listView drag'n drop is a big one, because now I'm using XCeed and their drag'n drop is a joke), but I thought I'd ask others what's their take on this (speed, feature set, memory footprint, stuff like that). If you haven't compared them, but are currently using one of them, please tell me what you think of it. thanx
We are using Syncfusion at work for a project under development, and I cannot recommend it to anyone. We've had to put up with buggy controls, not recognizing valid licenses, and horrible support. I'm sure there are people out there with nothing but good to say about Syncfusion. My co-workers and aren't among them. I cannot really give you any advice on the Component1 or Infragistics, but I have used DevExpress' controls, and they work quite nicely. I have noticed no bugs whatsoever, and their support is responsive and helpful!
-
We are using Syncfusion at work for a project under development, and I cannot recommend it to anyone. We've had to put up with buggy controls, not recognizing valid licenses, and horrible support. I'm sure there are people out there with nothing but good to say about Syncfusion. My co-workers and aren't among them. I cannot really give you any advice on the Component1 or Infragistics, but I have used DevExpress' controls, and they work quite nicely. I have noticed no bugs whatsoever, and their support is responsive and helpful!
-
Hi, Has anybody done a comparison between these 3 component suites? I need to pick one to integrate in my Windows-based app (the app has UI galore). After a quick glance, C1 doesn't seem very structured (has a lot of do-it-all components - the FlexGrid can also do Trees), whereas Infragistics and Syncfusion seem better layed out (I really like Syncfusion's docking manager). Most likely I'll have to write small apps with each suite to figure out if they have what I need (for example listView drag'n drop is a big one, because now I'm using XCeed and their drag'n drop is a joke), but I thought I'd ask others what's their take on this (speed, feature set, memory footprint, stuff like that). If you haven't compared them, but are currently using one of them, please tell me what you think of it. thanx
i worked with both infragistics and syncfusion controls (use some controls) and it is true as said by mark infragistics lacks good documentation u have to spent a time on it's forumn to do something... syncfusion's grid is more fast than the infragistic's grid some of infragistic's control are hard to implement only due to lack of documentation
-
i worked with both infragistics and syncfusion controls (use some controls) and it is true as said by mark infragistics lacks good documentation u have to spent a time on it's forumn to do something... syncfusion's grid is more fast than the infragistic's grid some of infragistic's control are hard to implement only due to lack of documentation