Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C#
  4. Checking several textboxes to make sure none are blank?

Checking several textboxes to make sure none are blank?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C#
cssquestion
12 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Vertekal
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I'm hoping there's a more streamlined approach to this. In a form, I have 7 textboxes and a button. When the button is clicked, each textbox needs to be looked at to ensure it contains something. If the textbox is blank, I have a label on the forum to alert the user of such. Then I direct focus to the blank textbox. So far I've been doing it like this: if (txt1.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt1"; txt1.focus(); } else if (txt2.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt2"; txt2.focus(); } else if (txt3.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt3"; txt3.focus(); } else if (... and so on, and so on for all 7 textboxes) Is there a way to do it with less code?

    P T P P 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • V Vertekal

      I'm hoping there's a more streamlined approach to this. In a form, I have 7 textboxes and a button. When the button is clicked, each textbox needs to be looked at to ensure it contains something. If the textbox is blank, I have a label on the forum to alert the user of such. Then I direct focus to the blank textbox. So far I've been doing it like this: if (txt1.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt1"; txt1.focus(); } else if (txt2.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt2"; txt2.focus(); } else if (txt3.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt3"; txt3.focus(); } else if (... and so on, and so on for all 7 textboxes) Is there a way to do it with less code?

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Pete OHanlon
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Realistically you should create a class that implements the data that you want, and then put a binding against the textbox. With a bit of the magic listed here[^] you can save yourself a lot of work keeping validation and items in sync.

      Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

      My blog | My articles

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • V Vertekal

        I'm hoping there's a more streamlined approach to this. In a form, I have 7 textboxes and a button. When the button is clicked, each textbox needs to be looked at to ensure it contains something. If the textbox is blank, I have a label on the forum to alert the user of such. Then I direct focus to the blank textbox. So far I've been doing it like this: if (txt1.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt1"; txt1.focus(); } else if (txt2.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt2"; txt2.focus(); } else if (txt3.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt3"; txt3.focus(); } else if (... and so on, and so on for all 7 textboxes) Is there a way to do it with less code?

        T Offline
        T Offline
        Thomas Stockwell
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        if you don't want to go with databinding which is a good option, you can combine all the if statements: if(txt1.Text=="" OR txt2.text=="" OR txt3.text="" OR ...) { ErrorLabel.text="All fields must be entered to continue"; } Their still may be better options though.

        Regards, Thomas Stockwell Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. Visit my homepage Oracle Studios[^]

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Thomas Stockwell

          if you don't want to go with databinding which is a good option, you can combine all the if statements: if(txt1.Text=="" OR txt2.text=="" OR txt3.text="" OR ...) { ErrorLabel.text="All fields must be entered to continue"; } Their still may be better options though.

          Regards, Thomas Stockwell Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. Visit my homepage Oracle Studios[^]

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gspiteri
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Why dont you just use required field validators?

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Pete OHanlon

            Realistically you should create a class that implements the data that you want, and then put a binding against the textbox. With a bit of the magic listed here[^] you can save yourself a lot of work keeping validation and items in sync.

            Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

            My blog | My articles

            N Offline
            N Offline
            N a v a n e e t h
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

            With a bit of the magic listed here[^] you can save yourself a lot of work keeping validation and items in sync.

            That's a great article. Do you know any similar approach available for web application ?

            All C# applications should call Application.Quit(); in the beginning to avoid any .NET problems.- Unclyclopedia How to use google | Ask smart questions

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G gspiteri

              Why dont you just use required field validators?

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Reelix
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              *Clicks the Back Button2* "Please fill in all the fields to continue" >:( The reason I've stopped using RequiredFieldValidators....

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N N a v a n e e t h

                Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

                With a bit of the magic listed here[^] you can save yourself a lot of work keeping validation and items in sync.

                That's a great article. Do you know any similar approach available for web application ?

                All C# applications should call Application.Quit(); in the beginning to avoid any .NET problems.- Unclyclopedia How to use google | Ask smart questions

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Pete OHanlon
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                You could adapt it using techniques described in this[^] article.

                Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                My blog | My articles

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • V Vertekal

                  I'm hoping there's a more streamlined approach to this. In a form, I have 7 textboxes and a button. When the button is clicked, each textbox needs to be looked at to ensure it contains something. If the textbox is blank, I have a label on the forum to alert the user of such. Then I direct focus to the blank textbox. So far I've been doing it like this: if (txt1.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt1"; txt1.focus(); } else if (txt2.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt2"; txt2.focus(); } else if (txt3.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt3"; txt3.focus(); } else if (... and so on, and so on for all 7 textboxes) Is there a way to do it with less code?

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Phil Martin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  How about this: foreach (var tb in new TextBox[] { txt1, txt2, txt3, txt4, txt5, txt6, txt7 }) { if (tb.Text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = string.format("Enter something in {0}", tb.Name); tb.Focus(); break; } } It aint pretty, and I'd prefer data binding, but it'd work?

                  G P V 3 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • P Phil Martin

                    How about this: foreach (var tb in new TextBox[] { txt1, txt2, txt3, txt4, txt5, txt6, txt7 }) { if (tb.Text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = string.format("Enter something in {0}", tb.Name); tb.Focus(); break; } } It aint pretty, and I'd prefer data binding, but it'd work?

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    gspiteri
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    If you set required field validators when tabbing to each textbox it instantly does validation i dont see the issue perhaps ive misinterperted your query

                    A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty I am a Optimist

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Phil Martin

                      How about this: foreach (var tb in new TextBox[] { txt1, txt2, txt3, txt4, txt5, txt6, txt7 }) { if (tb.Text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = string.format("Enter something in {0}", tb.Name); tb.Focus(); break; } } It aint pretty, and I'd prefer data binding, but it'd work?

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      PIEBALDconsult
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      That's what I would do too... so it must be wrong somehow. :laugh:

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • V Vertekal

                        I'm hoping there's a more streamlined approach to this. In a form, I have 7 textboxes and a button. When the button is clicked, each textbox needs to be looked at to ensure it contains something. If the textbox is blank, I have a label on the forum to alert the user of such. Then I direct focus to the blank textbox. So far I've been doing it like this: if (txt1.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt1"; txt1.focus(); } else if (txt2.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt2"; txt2.focus(); } else if (txt3.text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = "Enter something in txt3"; txt3.focus(); } else if (... and so on, and so on for all 7 textboxes) Is there a way to do it with less code?

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        PIEBALDconsult
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Or set the Button's Enabled property btn.Enabled = ( txt1.Text.Length > 0 ) && ... ;

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P Phil Martin

                          How about this: foreach (var tb in new TextBox[] { txt1, txt2, txt3, txt4, txt5, txt6, txt7 }) { if (tb.Text == "") { ErrorLabel.text = string.format("Enter something in {0}", tb.Name); tb.Focus(); break; } } It aint pretty, and I'd prefer data binding, but it'd work?

                          V Offline
                          V Offline
                          Vertekal
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          I'll give this a shot .. looks interesting I'd do databinding, but not sure how. I'm still new at this. If I created the DB within Visual Studio I'd be able to do it, but it's created at runtime (SQL CE) EDIT: I just tried it, and it worked great. Thanks!!!

                          modified on Friday, April 4, 2008 1:36 PM

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups