Calling for mr. John Simmons
-
Hello. Are you there?
// "In the end it's a little boy expressing himself." Yanni while (I_am_alive)
{
cout<<"I love to do more than just programming.";
} -
Hello. Are you there?
// "In the end it's a little boy expressing himself." Yanni while (I_am_alive)
{
cout<<"I love to do more than just programming.";
}What do you want? Just a sec, let's catch the audience up...
Hamed Mosavi wrote:
Just compiled a project that is trying me crazy since morning: Errors:6 Warnings:66 At least I found the reason
To which I replied:
Jon Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
- Sloppy coding? 2) The US Military is conducting clandestine anti-coding on your system in an effort to draw you into a declaration of war? 3) Your house is built over a new secret nuclear facility, and the radiation is adversely affecting your compiles? 4) Car bomb components and VB development can't be used in close proximity? 5) An Israeli mind-control device that makes Iranian programmers write crappy code? 6) Some of the virgins you've been promised are getting bored and have resorted to mischief in a pointless attempt at getting your attention? 7) Nobody appreciates just how hard it really is to write reliable code when you're constantly being interrupted with requests to package another dozen IEDs for shipment to Iraq.
The ball is now in your court.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
What do you want? Just a sec, let's catch the audience up...
Hamed Mosavi wrote:
Just compiled a project that is trying me crazy since morning: Errors:6 Warnings:66 At least I found the reason
To which I replied:
Jon Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
- Sloppy coding? 2) The US Military is conducting clandestine anti-coding on your system in an effort to draw you into a declaration of war? 3) Your house is built over a new secret nuclear facility, and the radiation is adversely affecting your compiles? 4) Car bomb components and VB development can't be used in close proximity? 5) An Israeli mind-control device that makes Iranian programmers write crappy code? 6) Some of the virgins you've been promised are getting bored and have resorted to mischief in a pointless attempt at getting your attention? 7) Nobody appreciates just how hard it really is to write reliable code when you're constantly being interrupted with requests to package another dozen IEDs for shipment to Iraq.
The ball is now in your court.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
What do you want? Just a sec, let's catch the audience up...
Hamed Mosavi wrote:
Just compiled a project that is trying me crazy since morning: Errors:6 Warnings:66 At least I found the reason
To which I replied:
Jon Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
- Sloppy coding? 2) The US Military is conducting clandestine anti-coding on your system in an effort to draw you into a declaration of war? 3) Your house is built over a new secret nuclear facility, and the radiation is adversely affecting your compiles? 4) Car bomb components and VB development can't be used in close proximity? 5) An Israeli mind-control device that makes Iranian programmers write crappy code? 6) Some of the virgins you've been promised are getting bored and have resorted to mischief in a pointless attempt at getting your attention? 7) Nobody appreciates just how hard it really is to write reliable code when you're constantly being interrupted with requests to package another dozen IEDs for shipment to Iraq.
The ball is now in your court.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001And I replied:
HamedMosavi wrote:
This makes me sad to have to answer what I haven't done and I hate. "Not all Iranian are terrorist" like "not all American are outlaw". What I don't understand is that while US was the first and only country which used nuclear bomb in the world, why Iranian people should suffer from the sanctions, just because maybe someone thinks Iran is seeking to find out how to create a nuclear missile? The other thing that I don't understand is your reason for these sentences when they bother me so much. I hate politics and terrorism. I'm here for science. I use C++ not VB. At least you could take a look at my articles.
Now it's your turn ;)
// "In the end it's a little boy expressing himself." Yanni while (I_am_alive)
{
cout<<"I love to do more than just programming.";
} -
He probably wants to respond to your idiotic post in the Lounge, dumbass.
It wasn't idiotic. It was a comment on the absurdity that defines the Middle East.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
It wasn't idiotic. It was a comment on the absurdity that defines the Middle East.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001It was rather unnecessary (not to mention insulting), particularly after Chris has recently requested people tone things down.
-
It wasn't idiotic. It was a comment on the absurdity that defines the Middle East.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
absurdity that defines the Middle East.
Why? Who made this definition? A man respecting humanity?
// "In the end it's a little boy expressing himself." Yanni while (I_am_alive)
{
cout<<"I love to do more than just programming.";
} -
And I replied:
HamedMosavi wrote:
This makes me sad to have to answer what I haven't done and I hate. "Not all Iranian are terrorist" like "not all American are outlaw". What I don't understand is that while US was the first and only country which used nuclear bomb in the world, why Iranian people should suffer from the sanctions, just because maybe someone thinks Iran is seeking to find out how to create a nuclear missile? The other thing that I don't understand is your reason for these sentences when they bother me so much. I hate politics and terrorism. I'm here for science. I use C++ not VB. At least you could take a look at my articles.
Now it's your turn ;)
// "In the end it's a little boy expressing himself." Yanni while (I_am_alive)
{
cout<<"I love to do more than just programming.";
}I'll bite!
Hamed Mosavi wrote:
while US was the first and only country which used nuclear bomb in the world, why Iranian people should suffer from the sanctions
America (and the rest of the world) was at war. Dropping that bomb killed many but saved many many more as it forced the Japs out of the war. That's the historical argument anyway. As to why Iran is sanctioned to not have nuclear weapons, do we really need to point out once again that your leaders have openly stated that they would wipe Israel off the map with them. Frankly, I dont think it'll ever happen - Israel is nuclear armed too and we have to trust the old M.A.D. rules would hold up just as well as they did during the cold war..... but best to be safe not sorry.
-
I'll bite!
Hamed Mosavi wrote:
while US was the first and only country which used nuclear bomb in the world, why Iranian people should suffer from the sanctions
America (and the rest of the world) was at war. Dropping that bomb killed many but saved many many more as it forced the Japs out of the war. That's the historical argument anyway. As to why Iran is sanctioned to not have nuclear weapons, do we really need to point out once again that your leaders have openly stated that they would wipe Israel off the map with them. Frankly, I dont think it'll ever happen - Israel is nuclear armed too and we have to trust the old M.A.D. rules would hold up just as well as they did during the cold war..... but best to be safe not sorry.
J4amieC wrote:
As to why Iran is sanctioned to not have nuclear weapons, do we really need to point out once again that your leaders have openly stated that they would wipe Israel off the map with them. Frankly, I dont think it'll ever happen - Israel is nuclear armed too and we have to trust the old M.A.D. rules would hold up just as well as they did during the cold war..... but best to be safe not sorry.
I wish I could share your confidence. While I don't expect an overt missile launch, Israel's small enough that even a single smuggled bomb would have catastrophic effects.
You know, every time I tried to win a bar-bet about being able to count to 1000 using my fingers I always got punched out when I reached 4.... -- El Corazon
-
I'll bite!
Hamed Mosavi wrote:
while US was the first and only country which used nuclear bomb in the world, why Iranian people should suffer from the sanctions
America (and the rest of the world) was at war. Dropping that bomb killed many but saved many many more as it forced the Japs out of the war. That's the historical argument anyway. As to why Iran is sanctioned to not have nuclear weapons, do we really need to point out once again that your leaders have openly stated that they would wipe Israel off the map with them. Frankly, I dont think it'll ever happen - Israel is nuclear armed too and we have to trust the old M.A.D. rules would hold up just as well as they did during the cold war..... but best to be safe not sorry.
J4amieC wrote:
I'll bite!
Sorry. I was really angry when writing them. Less thinking, maybe too much offensive. Please accept my apologies. In fact I believe you are not responsible for what someone else did, either good or bad.
J4amieC wrote:
your leaders
I'm afraid to talk about this. A prisoner can't do much from inside the prison.
// "In the end it's a little boy expressing himself." Yanni while (I_am_alive)
{
cout<<"I love to do more than just programming.";
} -
I'll bite!
Hamed Mosavi wrote:
while US was the first and only country which used nuclear bomb in the world, why Iranian people should suffer from the sanctions
America (and the rest of the world) was at war. Dropping that bomb killed many but saved many many more as it forced the Japs out of the war. That's the historical argument anyway. As to why Iran is sanctioned to not have nuclear weapons, do we really need to point out once again that your leaders have openly stated that they would wipe Israel off the map with them. Frankly, I dont think it'll ever happen - Israel is nuclear armed too and we have to trust the old M.A.D. rules would hold up just as well as they did during the cold war..... but best to be safe not sorry.
J4amieC wrote:
we have to trust the old M.A.D. rules would hold up just as well as they did during the cold war
Delusion, I'm afraid: I think Iran would not hesitate to deliver a first strike regardless of the consequences. They'll probably bank on the US holding Israel back or limiting the response or they'll just not care as long as they can seriously damage Israel. Only a dangerous fool would allow Iran to get hold of nuclear power with a zealot and fundamentalist with his finger on the button who has vowed to destroy Israel.
-
It was rather unnecessary (not to mention insulting), particularly after Chris has recently requested people tone things down.
he didn't mean anything by what he said and if you take offense it's a personal problem with you, dumbass.
"I'm not altogether all together."
-
And I replied:
HamedMosavi wrote:
This makes me sad to have to answer what I haven't done and I hate. "Not all Iranian are terrorist" like "not all American are outlaw". What I don't understand is that while US was the first and only country which used nuclear bomb in the world, why Iranian people should suffer from the sanctions, just because maybe someone thinks Iran is seeking to find out how to create a nuclear missile? The other thing that I don't understand is your reason for these sentences when they bother me so much. I hate politics and terrorism. I'm here for science. I use C++ not VB. At least you could take a look at my articles.
Now it's your turn ;)
// "In the end it's a little boy expressing himself." Yanni while (I_am_alive)
{
cout<<"I love to do more than just programming.";
}It was like the Top-10 list from David Letterman (only I couldn't come up with ten things). But since you want to make it a serious political discussion... First, I don't know the minds of the men that decided to develop/use nuclear weapons, and you certainly can' blame anyone other than those men for that action. If you really sit down and analyze it, whoever developed the tech first was bound to use it. I suppose it came down to a matter of either was us doing it, or the Japanese/Nazis doing it. Which would you have preferred? (And don't think for even half a second that the Nazis would have stopped with just two weapons.) Lastly, it looks like the whole world learned a very scary lesson that day, and nukes haven't been used since. The fact that the US is the first and only country to use nuclear weapons is irrelevant to this discussion. Now, presented with the admittedly skewed news media reports, and mixed in with a jaundiced view of military intelligence reports, here's what we think we know. 1) Iran is actively supplying insurgents in Iraq with weapons, training, and (covertly) manpower. This is being done in an attempt to keep Iraq destabilized. 2) Iran is actively seeking nuclear technology. The goal of thousands of centrifuges is NOT for development of nuclear fuel for reactors, but is a blatant attempt to develop nuclear weapons. 3) Given Iran's disdain for all things U.S. and Israeli, you can probably understand the trepidation most of the rest of the world has expressed with regards to Iran's nuclear ambitions. It doesn't take a high-school graduate to figure Iran is up to no good with regards to its nuclear energy program. 4) I personally think the sanctions are pointless. It hasn't stopped Iran's search for nuclear weapon technology. 5) I personally think the US government isn't trying hard enough to avoid armed conflict with Iran. 6) I personally think that the Iraq war was a bad idea because the intel claiming the presence of "weapons of mass destruction" were too vague, and almost impossible to verify. 7) I personally think that the US should stop meddling in the affairs other countries (or at least be more selective about where they meddle and when). It's obvious to me that the Middle East - as a whole - is not interested in working out their regional differences. Y'all are acting like a bunch of third graders fighting over a swing on the playground. 8) VB sucks and I actually pity anyone forced to code in it. However, if they refuse to walk into the ligh
-
he didn't mean anything by what he said and if you take offense it's a personal problem with you, dumbass.
"I'm not altogether all together."
Oh I see, you're the resident expert on Mr. Simmons are you, asshat? Look old fart, you don't interest me in the least. I understand you were too stupid to realize that so you can just silently sod off and do whatever the old and infirm do; watch paint dry I think.
-
J4amieC wrote:
I'll bite!
Sorry. I was really angry when writing them. Less thinking, maybe too much offensive. Please accept my apologies. In fact I believe you are not responsible for what someone else did, either good or bad.
J4amieC wrote:
your leaders
I'm afraid to talk about this. A prisoner can't do much from inside the prison.
// "In the end it's a little boy expressing himself." Yanni while (I_am_alive)
{
cout<<"I love to do more than just programming.";
}Hamed Mosavi wrote:
I'm afraid to talk about this. A prisoner can't do much from inside the prison.
That's why you (as well as others in Iran and China and other coutries in the world where they put people in prisons because of what they think and write ) need to go down in the street in MASSES and fight for your OWN freedom. As an example, if I go on the street with a sign saying "Stephen Harper is an asshole" (which he is BTW), I will get strange looks from people, but I will not get arrested; try to do that in Iran, or China (or some other countries... ), if you get arrested for your political opinions, then your country is wrong. It's not ours to give, but yours to win. Like the great philosophers (The Beasty Boys) of our time says : "You need to fight for your right to party!" another BTW, try to get the movie "Persepolis" (probably banned in Iran), it's a very good animation based on a cartoon by Marjane Satrapi. 40 years ago, there was the "Mai '68" uprising in Europe and the North Ameria (to a lesser extent) and one of the motto was : "Il est interdit d'interdir" which translate to "It's forbidden to forbid". Try to apply this to your own life.
Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
-
Oh I see, you're the resident expert on Mr. Simmons are you, asshat? Look old fart, you don't interest me in the least. I understand you were too stupid to realize that so you can just silently sod off and do whatever the old and infirm do; watch paint dry I think.
har har Your mommy's calling, better go get your diaper changed.
"I'm not altogether all together."
-
I'll bite!
Hamed Mosavi wrote:
while US was the first and only country which used nuclear bomb in the world, why Iranian people should suffer from the sanctions
America (and the rest of the world) was at war. Dropping that bomb killed many but saved many many more as it forced the Japs out of the war. That's the historical argument anyway. As to why Iran is sanctioned to not have nuclear weapons, do we really need to point out once again that your leaders have openly stated that they would wipe Israel off the map with them. Frankly, I dont think it'll ever happen - Israel is nuclear armed too and we have to trust the old M.A.D. rules would hold up just as well as they did during the cold war..... but best to be safe not sorry.
J4amieC wrote:
Frankly, I dont think it'll ever happen - Israel is nuclear armed too and we have to trust the old M.A.D. rules would hold up just as well as they did during the cold war.....
On the other hand, MAD works only if neither party *is* mad. So:
J4amieC wrote:
..... but best to be safe not sorry.
-
Hamed Mosavi wrote:
I'm afraid to talk about this. A prisoner can't do much from inside the prison.
That's why you (as well as others in Iran and China and other coutries in the world where they put people in prisons because of what they think and write ) need to go down in the street in MASSES and fight for your OWN freedom. As an example, if I go on the street with a sign saying "Stephen Harper is an asshole" (which he is BTW), I will get strange looks from people, but I will not get arrested; try to do that in Iran, or China (or some other countries... ), if you get arrested for your political opinions, then your country is wrong. It's not ours to give, but yours to win. Like the great philosophers (The Beasty Boys) of our time says : "You need to fight for your right to party!" another BTW, try to get the movie "Persepolis" (probably banned in Iran), it's a very good animation based on a cartoon by Marjane Satrapi. 40 years ago, there was the "Mai '68" uprising in Europe and the North Ameria (to a lesser extent) and one of the motto was : "Il est interdit d'interdir" which translate to "It's forbidden to forbid". Try to apply this to your own life.
Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
Maximilien wrote:
40 years ago, there was the "Mai '68" uprising in Europe and the North Ameria (to a lesser extent) and one of the motto was : "Il est interdit d'interdir" which translate to "It's forbidden to forbid".
Is it any wonder that Political Correctness (and multi-culti) has such a hold over Eutopia?
-
It was rather unnecessary (not to mention insulting), particularly after Chris has recently requested people tone things down.
-
har har Your mommy's calling, better go get your diaper changed.
"I'm not altogether all together."
Goodness, these withering assaults of yours are certainly too much for me. Where do you get them from, you must have a vast repository. Consequently, you'll forgive me for moving on and interacting with someone more, how you say, "intelligent".
