array size
-
Nope, that's from a '20 year experienced' java developer. Found it in a still running webservice which receives orders from our website. This guy is no longer employed, but we have a lot of fun with his work.
darth_bug wrote:
java developer
That explains everything. ;P
Mostly, when you see programmers, they aren't doing anything. One of the attractive things about programmers is that you cannot tell whether or not they are working simply by looking at them. Very often they're sitting there seemingly drinking coffee and gossiping, or just staring into space. What the programmer is trying to do is get a handle on all the individual and unrelated ideas that are scampering around in his head. (Charles M Strauss)
-
Nope, that's from a '20 year experienced' java developer. Found it in a still running webservice which receives orders from our website. This guy is no longer employed, but we have a lot of fun with his work.
-
CPallini wrote:
Did your boss coded it?
That is why he is a boss! :-D
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis LevinsonDefinitely. :-D
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke -
int j=0; for (int i=0; i < a.length; ++i) { j++; } System.out.println("array size=" + j);
Now you have me confused. Does this not show the correct array size when it is run? Seriously, who knows what he thought he was doing. Sometimes everyone does not see the forest anymore because of all the trees. Things like that have happened to me, usually after editing the code several times in a hurry, leaving senseless relics like this appears to be.
A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.
-
Now you have me confused. Does this not show the correct array size when it is run? Seriously, who knows what he thought he was doing. Sometimes everyone does not see the forest anymore because of all the trees. Things like that have happened to me, usually after editing the code several times in a hurry, leaving senseless relics like this appears to be.
A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.
CDP1802 wrote:
Does this not show the correct array size when it is run
Actually, it does. But I think the probability that
jis equal toa.lengthat the end of the loop is very high.~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb -
Nope, that's from a '20 year experienced' java developer. Found it in a still running webservice which receives orders from our website. This guy is no longer employed, but we have a lot of fun with his work.
-
CDP1802 wrote:
Does this not show the correct array size when it is run
Actually, it does. But I think the probability that
jis equal toa.lengthat the end of the loop is very high.~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverbI sure know that. Irony does not communicate well in a post :-))) To me it just looks like the loop previously contained some code which got edited away, leaving this construction. Even then, using the counter variable may be a valid, but not very wise choice.
A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.
-
Now you have me confused. Does this not show the correct array size when it is run? Seriously, who knows what he thought he was doing. Sometimes everyone does not see the forest anymore because of all the trees. Things like that have happened to me, usually after editing the code several times in a hurry, leaving senseless relics like this appears to be.
A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.
-
CDP1802 wrote:
Does this not show the correct array size when it is run?
never ever trust CLR. Who knows if it right about the array size...
Yusuf
-
CDP1802 wrote:
Does this not show the correct array size when it is run?
never ever trust CLR. Who knows if it right about the array size...
Yusuf
Yeah, we can only hope you don't trust the processor to handle your computations either - I made that mistake a long time ago. I handle all of mine now at the binary level.
-
CDP1802 wrote:
Does this not show the correct array size when it is run?
never ever trust CLR. Who knows if it right about the array size...
Yusuf
Now that you mention it... taken to the extreme this means building your own processor from discrete parts, building the rest of the computer the same way around it and then starting on an own operating system. This will be one slow and bulky contraption, so much is sure. Never trust a computer that you have not personally misconstructed and misprogrammed, like in the good old days.
A while ago he asked me what he should have printed on my business cards. I said 'Wizard'. I read books which nobody else understand. Then I do something which nobody understands. After that the computer does something which nobody understands. When asked, I say things about the results which nobody understand. But everybody expects miracles from me on a regular basis. Looks to me like the classical definition of a wizard.
-
CDP1802 wrote:
Does this not show the correct array size when it is run?
never ever trust CLR. Who knows if it right about the array size...
Yusuf
