Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Are you smarter than a 17-year-old?

Are you smarter than a 17-year-old?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestionannouncementlearning
92 Posts 20 Posters 6 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B bulg

    I believe the meme you're wanting goes by "No Child Left Behind" .edit. 5/6, i thought the walt whitman one was misleading due to capitalization of 'i' :doh:

    P Offline
    P Offline
    Paul Conrad
    wrote on last edited by
    #70

    bulg wrote:

    "No Child Left Behind"

    ...and that's a joke.

    "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • O Oakman

      A study being released today finds that, 25 years after President Ronald Reagan released "A Nation At Risk," which was critical of the USA's public school curriculum, many 17-year-olds still don't know much about American history or classic literature. But how much do you know? Here are six questions from the survey, and the percent of teens who answered correctly. Note: U.S. centric.

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

      S Offline
      S Offline
      soap brain
      wrote on last edited by
      #71

      Well, I got none of them... :(

      There used to be a me, but I had it surgically removed.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • O Oakman

        Mike Mullikin wrote:

        I got all 6. Brought it to my 18 y/o son (today is his birthday!) who is interning in the mechanical engineering office across the hall and he too got all 6.

        We need more people like you raising kids. Luckily, you seem to be replicating yourself.

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jorgen Sigvardsson
        wrote on last edited by
        #72

        I'm probably more damaged than I had previously thought. I got this image in my head, where Mike is building his son out of small metal pieces. (Think Stargate SG-1). :~

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Christian Graus

          I'm getting at that US 'history' is an excuse to teach manifest destiny, i.e that the people of the US are on a mission from God. Thus, the truth of the matter is obscured if it's less than glorious.

          Dirk Higbee wrote:

          but factual archeology has supported what is written in the Bible and anything other than creation falls down on the job.

          Interesting.... So you believe that archeology supports a young earth and a 6 day creation ?

          Christian Graus No longer a Microsoft MVP, but still happy to answer your questions.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dirk Higbee
          wrote on last edited by
          #73

          Christian Graus wrote:

          the people of the US are on a mission from God

          unfortunately we're not all on the same page over here----there are some misguided martyrs roaming about

          Christian Graus wrote:

          a 6 day creation

          yeah, but remember 1 day to God is 1000 years to Man so it would be the 6000 year creation. Also, the only point of archeology that doesn't wash is the carbon dating. With no original reference point and not knowing if acceleration aging does or doesn't exist, it is not a good schema.

          Don't take any wooden nickels.

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Dirk Higbee

            Christian Graus wrote:

            the people of the US are on a mission from God

            unfortunately we're not all on the same page over here----there are some misguided martyrs roaming about

            Christian Graus wrote:

            a 6 day creation

            yeah, but remember 1 day to God is 1000 years to Man so it would be the 6000 year creation. Also, the only point of archeology that doesn't wash is the carbon dating. With no original reference point and not knowing if acceleration aging does or doesn't exist, it is not a good schema.

            Don't take any wooden nickels.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            soap brain
            wrote on last edited by
            #74

            Dirk Higbee wrote:

            yeah, but remember 1 day to God is 1000 years to Man so it would be the 6000 year creation.

            I thought God transcended the Universe, so time wouldn't apply to him. Anyway, a day is an arbitrary measure related to the Earth, so what is 1 day of God's measuring?

            Dirk Higbee wrote:

            Also, the only point of archeology that doesn't wash is the carbon dating. With no original reference point and not knowing if acceleration aging does or doesn't exist, it is not a good schema.

            Do you actually understand carbon dating?

            There used to be a me, but I had it surgically removed.

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Christian Graus wrote:

              I'm told the three ways are a hot bath, hot curry or hot sex.

              Target have trampolines on sale. That suggestion didnt go down so well.

              O Offline
              O Offline
              Oakman
              wrote on last edited by
              #75

              Josh Gray wrote:

              That suggestion didnt go down so well.

              I am surprised you are still standing. :laugh: Fingers crossed for you and yours.

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Christian Graus

                I'm getting at that US 'history' is an excuse to teach manifest destiny, i.e that the people of the US are on a mission from God. Thus, the truth of the matter is obscured if it's less than glorious.

                Dirk Higbee wrote:

                but factual archeology has supported what is written in the Bible and anything other than creation falls down on the job.

                Interesting.... So you believe that archeology supports a young earth and a 6 day creation ?

                Christian Graus No longer a Microsoft MVP, but still happy to answer your questions.

                O Offline
                O Offline
                Oakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #76

                Christian Graus wrote:

                manifest destiny, i.e that the people of the US are on a mission from God.

                Manifest Destiny was the belief that the USA was destined to expand from Atlantic to Pacific. It did not necessarily claim that God had determined that it was so, but was a rallying cry of the Jacksonian Democrats to justify the expansion into the western half of North America. It was a particularly American version of "White Man's Burden*," so beloved by Europe and Australia. There was an attempt later to use the same rallying cry to justify America taking over Spanish possessions after the Spanish-American War at the end of the 19th century, but fell into disuse by the early twentieth. The last important use of the phrase was when Woodrow Wilson declared that it was America's manifest destiny to stand as a beacon of democracy for the dictatorial powers of Europe - a far cry from what it once meant.

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Shog9 0

                  jgasm wrote:

                  personally, i am holding out for the zombie invasion

                  Still looking for love, eh? ;)

                  Citizen 20.1.01

                  'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  keyboard warrior
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #77

                  haha i remember seeing this on digg and thinking, what the hell

                  ----------------------------------------------------------- "When I first saw it, I just thought that you really, really enjoyed programming in java." - Leslie Sanford

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S soap brain

                    Dirk Higbee wrote:

                    yeah, but remember 1 day to God is 1000 years to Man so it would be the 6000 year creation.

                    I thought God transcended the Universe, so time wouldn't apply to him. Anyway, a day is an arbitrary measure related to the Earth, so what is 1 day of God's measuring?

                    Dirk Higbee wrote:

                    Also, the only point of archeology that doesn't wash is the carbon dating. With no original reference point and not knowing if acceleration aging does or doesn't exist, it is not a good schema.

                    Do you actually understand carbon dating?

                    There used to be a me, but I had it surgically removed.

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Dirk Higbee
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #78

                    Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                    I thought God transcended the Universe, so time wouldn't apply to him. Anyway, a day is an arbitrary measure related to the Earth, so what is 1 day of God's measuring?

                    God created time for us when he created the Earth. He then put it in perspective several times in the Bible telling us 1000 of our years is but 1 day to him, giving us a relative timeline.

                    Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                    Do you actually understand carbon dating?

                    a little: Carbon-14 is made when cosmic rays knock neutrons out of atomic nuclei in the upper atmosphere. These displaced neutrons, now moving fast, hit ordinary nitrogen (14N) at lower altitudes, converting it into 14C. Unlike common carbon (12C), 14C is unstable and slowly decays, changing it back to nitrogen and releasing energy. This instability makes it radioactive. The rate of decay of 14C is such that half of an amount will convert back to 14N in 5,730 years (plus or minus 40 years). This is the “half-life.” So, in two half-lives, or 11,460 years, only one-quarter of that in living organisms at present, then it has a theoretical age of 11,460 years. Anything over about 50,000 years old, should theoretically have no detectable 14C left. That is why radiocarbon dating cannot give millions of years. In fact, if a sample contains 14C, it is good evidence that it is not millions of years old.

                    Don't take any wooden nickels.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Paul Conrad

                      Ilíon wrote:

                      Public education has been being dumbed-down for a long time.

                      A shame that is.

                      "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

                      I Offline
                      I Offline
                      Ilion
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #79

                      Paul Conrad wrote:

                      A shame that is.

                      What we need in this country is Separation of School and State!

                      J P 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • I Ilion

                        Paul Conrad wrote:

                        A shame that is.

                        What we need in this country is Separation of School and State!

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        John Carson
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #80

                        Ilíon wrote:

                        What we need in this country is Separation of School and State!

                        Other countries seem to manage to provide a decent education for their children in public schools.

                        John Carson

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • O Oakman

                          A study being released today finds that, 25 years after President Ronald Reagan released "A Nation At Risk," which was critical of the USA's public school curriculum, many 17-year-olds still don't know much about American history or classic literature. But how much do you know? Here are six questions from the survey, and the percent of teens who answered correctly. Note: U.S. centric.

                          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          MarkB777
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #81

                          Grading kids in schools on their ability to remember dates is stupid. I don't give a sh*t about the exact date Captain Cook sailed to New Zealand, or the years the American Civil War took place. Sure, it's good to learn a little bit about these things, put we should be looking forward, not backwards. Common sense and logic/analytical reasoning is a far better indication of someone's intelligence.

                          Mark Brock Click here to view my blog

                          O B 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • D Dirk Higbee

                            Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                            I thought God transcended the Universe, so time wouldn't apply to him. Anyway, a day is an arbitrary measure related to the Earth, so what is 1 day of God's measuring?

                            God created time for us when he created the Earth. He then put it in perspective several times in the Bible telling us 1000 of our years is but 1 day to him, giving us a relative timeline.

                            Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                            Do you actually understand carbon dating?

                            a little: Carbon-14 is made when cosmic rays knock neutrons out of atomic nuclei in the upper atmosphere. These displaced neutrons, now moving fast, hit ordinary nitrogen (14N) at lower altitudes, converting it into 14C. Unlike common carbon (12C), 14C is unstable and slowly decays, changing it back to nitrogen and releasing energy. This instability makes it radioactive. The rate of decay of 14C is such that half of an amount will convert back to 14N in 5,730 years (plus or minus 40 years). This is the “half-life.” So, in two half-lives, or 11,460 years, only one-quarter of that in living organisms at present, then it has a theoretical age of 11,460 years. Anything over about 50,000 years old, should theoretically have no detectable 14C left. That is why radiocarbon dating cannot give millions of years. In fact, if a sample contains 14C, it is good evidence that it is not millions of years old.

                            Don't take any wooden nickels.

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            soap brain
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #82

                            Dirk Higbee wrote:

                            God created time for us when he created the Earth. He then put it in perspective several times in the Bible telling us 1000 of our years is but 1 day to him, giving us a relative timeline.

                            That still doesn't make sense - a day is defined as being the time it takes for the Earth to rotate once. What's rotating on HIS end?

                            Dirk Higbee wrote:

                            Carbon-14 is made when cosmic rays knock neutrons out of atomic nuclei in the upper atmosphere. These displaced neutrons, now moving fast, hit ordinary nitrogen (14N) at lower altitudes, converting it into 14C. Unlike common carbon (12C), 14C is unstable and slowly decays, changing it back to nitrogen and releasing energy. This instability makes it radioactive. The rate of decay of 14C is such that half of an amount will convert back to 14N in 5,730 years (plus or minus 40 years). This is the “half-life.” So, in two half-lives, or 11,460 years, only one-quarter of that in living organisms at present, then it has a theoretical age of 11,460 years. Anything over about 50,000 years old, should theoretically have no detectable 14C left. That is why radiocarbon dating cannot give millions of years. In fact, if a sample contains 14C, it is good evidence that it is not millions of years old.

                            Not quite, it gives an accuracy of up to about 60,000 years. It follows an exponential decay function, which is a bit more complicated. But it DOES prove that the Earth is older than 6,000 years old.

                            There used to be a me, but I had it surgically removed.

                            D 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M MarkB777

                              Grading kids in schools on their ability to remember dates is stupid. I don't give a sh*t about the exact date Captain Cook sailed to New Zealand, or the years the American Civil War took place. Sure, it's good to learn a little bit about these things, put we should be looking forward, not backwards. Common sense and logic/analytical reasoning is a far better indication of someone's intelligence.

                              Mark Brock Click here to view my blog

                              O Offline
                              O Offline
                              Oakman
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #83

                              MarkBrock wrote:

                              Common sense and logic/analytical reasoning is a far better indication of someone's intelligence.

                              Agreed. Now let us talk about education. You know, where people memorise things like the multiplication tables and dates. Intelligent people who don't learn things like 9x9=81 or the speed of light=186,282 mps or the American Civil War took place from 1861 to 1865 have handicapped themselves.

                              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • O Oakman

                                MarkBrock wrote:

                                Common sense and logic/analytical reasoning is a far better indication of someone's intelligence.

                                Agreed. Now let us talk about education. You know, where people memorise things like the multiplication tables and dates. Intelligent people who don't learn things like 9x9=81 or the speed of light=186,282 mps or the American Civil War took place from 1861 to 1865 have handicapped themselves.

                                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                MarkB777
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #84

                                Oakman wrote:

                                Intelligent people who don't learn things like:

                                Oakman wrote:

                                9x9=81

                                touché

                                Oakman wrote:

                                speed of light=186,282 mps

                                touché

                                Oakman wrote:

                                American Civil War took place from 1861 to 1865

                                Great - If I get onto Wheel of Fortune.

                                Mark Brock Click here to view my blog

                                O 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M MarkB777

                                  Oakman wrote:

                                  Intelligent people who don't learn things like:

                                  Oakman wrote:

                                  9x9=81

                                  touché

                                  Oakman wrote:

                                  speed of light=186,282 mps

                                  touché

                                  Oakman wrote:

                                  American Civil War took place from 1861 to 1865

                                  Great - If I get onto Wheel of Fortune.

                                  Mark Brock Click here to view my blog

                                  O Offline
                                  O Offline
                                  Oakman
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #85

                                  MarkBrock wrote:

                                  Great - If I get onto Wheel of Fortune.

                                  Or ever try to figure out how the U.S. political system got that way.

                                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • I Ilion

                                    Paul Conrad wrote:

                                    A shame that is.

                                    What we need in this country is Separation of School and State!

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    Paul Conrad
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #86

                                    We already have things like that called Private Schools :rolleyes:

                                    "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

                                    I 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • P Paul Conrad

                                      We already have things like that called Private Schools :rolleyes:

                                      "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

                                      I Offline
                                      I Offline
                                      Ilion
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #87

                                      Paul Conrad wrote:

                                      We already have things like that called Private Schools :rolleyes:

                                      :rolleyes: Yourself. The vast majority of America's children are consigned to the state-run indoctrination/propagandization centers we call "public schools." These do not exist for the benefit of the children, but for: 1) the immediate benefit of the unions which all-but-in-name own the educationisis who run and staff the schools; 2) the long-term (though short-sighted) benefit of the leftists who realize that the only way to take over American society is to train up the newer generations to be constitutionally unable to question "liberal" pieties.

                                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • I Ilion

                                        Paul Conrad wrote:

                                        We already have things like that called Private Schools :rolleyes:

                                        :rolleyes: Yourself. The vast majority of America's children are consigned to the state-run indoctrination/propagandization centers we call "public schools." These do not exist for the benefit of the children, but for: 1) the immediate benefit of the unions which all-but-in-name own the educationisis who run and staff the schools; 2) the long-term (though short-sighted) benefit of the leftists who realize that the only way to take over American society is to train up the newer generations to be constitutionally unable to question "liberal" pieties.

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        Paul Conrad
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #88

                                        Ilíon wrote:

                                        [Roll eyes] Yourself.

                                        :laugh:

                                        Ilíon wrote:

                                        the long-term (though short-sighted) benefit of the leftists who realize that the only way to take over American society is to train up the newer generations to be constitutionally unable to question "liberal" pieties.

                                        Right on. All they are doing is poisoning young minds into their favor. Maybe that's why there is a lack of respect or common sense these days.

                                        "The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M MarkB777

                                          Grading kids in schools on their ability to remember dates is stupid. I don't give a sh*t about the exact date Captain Cook sailed to New Zealand, or the years the American Civil War took place. Sure, it's good to learn a little bit about these things, put we should be looking forward, not backwards. Common sense and logic/analytical reasoning is a far better indication of someone's intelligence.

                                          Mark Brock Click here to view my blog

                                          B Offline
                                          B Offline
                                          brianwelsch
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #89

                                          It isn't about remembering stupid dates. It's about being able to put past events into context and understanding how the world got the way it is. Using that understanding is helpful in working out solutions to today's problems.

                                          BW


                                          Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand.
                                          Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand.
                                          -- Neil Peart

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups