Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Tell me this guy ain't a Marxist...

Tell me this guy ain't a Marxist...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestion
39 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Stan Shannon

    Oakman wrote:

    But one passed by the peepul, right?

    Certainly. But, of course, in my ideal government, only those actually producing and paying more into the system than they get back from it would be allowed to vote anyway.

    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Oakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #29

    Stan Shannon wrote:

    But, of course, in my ideal government, only those actually producing and paying more into the system than they get back from it would be allowed to vote anyway.

    Yeah, that's pretty much what Mugabe has set up.

    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Stan Shannon

      Oakman wrote:

      And you do believe McCain???

      Not so much. I think he is an intrinsically more honest person than Obama. But I certainly believe that he will be even less likey to keep any promist to conservatives than Bush was. He will probably keep his promises to everyone else as best he can. But he has nothing but contempt for conservatives, probably more so than Obama does.

      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

      O Offline
      O Offline
      Oakman
      wrote on last edited by
      #30

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      But he has nothing but contempt for conservatives, probably more so than Obama does.

      Well, they certainly haven't put their money where their mouth is (I'll bet you haven't - on the Presidential level - either), so if by some strange quirk of fate he won, they'd have no-one to blame for their lack of access but themselves.

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Stan Shannon

        Sorry. Yes, I think the quote is something more like "from those with means to those with need" or something like that, except in German of course. Still, most of those with means will be those with ability, plus a few lucky incompetents I suppose. I'm actually pretty sure though that most of the incomptents will be those with need.

        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Oakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #31

        Stan Shannon wrote:

        I'm actually pretty sure though that most of the incomptents will be those with need.

        or be CEO's of banks and thus on the donor side of the equation.

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • O Oakman

          Stan Shannon wrote:

          But he has nothing but contempt for conservatives, probably more so than Obama does.

          Well, they certainly haven't put their money where their mouth is (I'll bet you haven't - on the Presidential level - either), so if by some strange quirk of fate he won, they'd have no-one to blame for their lack of access but themselves.

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Stan Shannon
          wrote on last edited by
          #32

          Oakman wrote:

          (I'll bet you haven't - on the Presidential level - either),

          I sent a money to Fred Thompson's campaign. I was going to send money to McCain after he selected Palin, but by the time I got around to he had already pissed me off again so I declined. Frankly, I'm glad the conservatives have not supported him. Save our money for a better candidate later.

          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

          O 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • O Oakman

            Stan Shannon wrote:

            But, of course, in my ideal government, only those actually producing and paying more into the system than they get back from it would be allowed to vote anyway.

            Yeah, that's pretty much what Mugabe has set up.

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Stan Shannon
            wrote on last edited by
            #33

            Oakman wrote:

            Yeah, that's pretty much what Mugabe has set up.

            As well as the founders of our own nation.

            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

            O 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Stan Shannon

              Oakman wrote:

              Yeah, that's pretty much what Mugabe has set up.

              As well as the founders of our own nation.

              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

              O Offline
              O Offline
              Oakman
              wrote on last edited by
              #34

              Stan Shannon wrote:

              As well as the founders of our own nation

              Not at all. They set up a very libertarian confederacy. Then when the founders weren't looking a bunch of professional politicians hijacked the second convention and wrote the constitution.

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Stan Shannon

                Oakman wrote:

                (I'll bet you haven't - on the Presidential level - either),

                I sent a money to Fred Thompson's campaign. I was going to send money to McCain after he selected Palin, but by the time I got around to he had already pissed me off again so I declined. Frankly, I'm glad the conservatives have not supported him. Save our money for a better candidate later.

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                O Offline
                O Offline
                Oakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #35

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                Save our money for a better candidate later.

                I didn't think there was going to be another one. Won't Obama declare himself Beloved Leader for Life in a couple of years?

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O Oakman

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  As well as the founders of our own nation

                  Not at all. They set up a very libertarian confederacy. Then when the founders weren't looking a bunch of professional politicians hijacked the second convention and wrote the constitution.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Stan Shannon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #36

                  :rolleyes: I would be perfectly happy if the articles of confederation were maintained, but they certainly did not represent a libertarian confederation. But both the original articles and the constitution both limited voting rights to (white male) land owners. They thought that those with an investment in society were the ones who were responsible enough to be trusted with the right to vote. I share that sentiment.

                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • O Oakman

                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                    Save our money for a better candidate later.

                    I didn't think there was going to be another one. Won't Obama declare himself Beloved Leader for Life in a couple of years?

                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Stan Shannon
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #37

                    Oakman wrote:

                    Won't Obama declare himself Beloved Leader for Life in a couple of years?

                    Could be. But that would be fine with me. At least it would answer the question of whether or not there is anything left of American zeal for liberty.

                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Stan Shannon

                      :rolleyes: I would be perfectly happy if the articles of confederation were maintained, but they certainly did not represent a libertarian confederation. But both the original articles and the constitution both limited voting rights to (white male) land owners. They thought that those with an investment in society were the ones who were responsible enough to be trusted with the right to vote. I share that sentiment.

                      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                      O Offline
                      O Offline
                      Oakman
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #38

                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                      They thought that those with an investment in society were the ones who were responsible enough to be trusted with the right to vote.

                      Perhaps the fact that they were all white male land oweners had something to do with it, eh? I agree, by the way. I just think there are other ways of displaying an investment in society - as I think you know.

                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • O Oakman

                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                        They thought that those with an investment in society were the ones who were responsible enough to be trusted with the right to vote.

                        Perhaps the fact that they were all white male land oweners had something to do with it, eh? I agree, by the way. I just think there are other ways of displaying an investment in society - as I think you know.

                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Stan Shannon
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #39

                        Oakman wrote:

                        I just think there are other ways of displaying an investment in society - as I think you know.

                        Indeed I do, one of which would be the difference between what one pays in taxes and what one receives in welfare or other subsidies.

                        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups