Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. Site Bugs / Suggestions
  4. new "reason for vote" feature

new "reason for vote" feature

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Site Bugs / Suggestions
8 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rob Graham
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    All though I think this is a nice idea, I am not particularly fond of the fact that it seems to be mandatory for 1 and 2 votes, and is not aware of posts already made.  Eventually I'll learn to remember a bout this and vote before I comment (so I can use this, and just change the post title by editing), but for now it is quite annoying, and causes my to leave dumb posts like "see below". I rarely low vote an article without leaving a post to explain why, and this seems overkill to deal with a few rude idiots. A "post already made" checkbox, in lieu of a programmatic check would be nice...

    C D Y 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • R Rob Graham

      All though I think this is a nice idea, I am not particularly fond of the fact that it seems to be mandatory for 1 and 2 votes, and is not aware of posts already made.  Eventually I'll learn to remember a bout this and vote before I comment (so I can use this, and just change the post title by editing), but for now it is quite annoying, and causes my to leave dumb posts like "see below". I rarely low vote an article without leaving a post to explain why, and this seems overkill to deal with a few rude idiots. A "post already made" checkbox, in lieu of a programmatic check would be nice...

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chris Maunder
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Rob Graham wrote:

      A "post already made" checkbox

      But this would allow people to circumvent actually making a post and hence would defeat the purpose.

      cheers, Chris Maunder

      CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Chris Maunder

        Rob Graham wrote:

        A "post already made" checkbox

        But this would allow people to circumvent actually making a post and hence would defeat the purpose.

        cheers, Chris Maunder

        CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Rob Graham
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        True enough. Guess you'll just have to put up with a few duplicate posts from me, I'm a slow learner.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Rob Graham

          All though I think this is a nice idea, I am not particularly fond of the fact that it seems to be mandatory for 1 and 2 votes, and is not aware of posts already made.  Eventually I'll learn to remember a bout this and vote before I comment (so I can use this, and just change the post title by editing), but for now it is quite annoying, and causes my to leave dumb posts like "see below". I rarely low vote an article without leaving a post to explain why, and this seems overkill to deal with a few rude idiots. A "post already made" checkbox, in lieu of a programmatic check would be nice...

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Chris Maunder
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I'm placing the vote control inside the 'Add a message' page so you can hit two birds with one stone.

          cheers, Chris Maunder

          CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Maunder

            I'm placing the vote control inside the 'Add a message' page so you can hit two birds with one stone.

            cheers, Chris Maunder

            CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Rob Graham
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Thanks, Chris. That'll fix it for me!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Rob Graham

              All though I think this is a nice idea, I am not particularly fond of the fact that it seems to be mandatory for 1 and 2 votes, and is not aware of posts already made.  Eventually I'll learn to remember a bout this and vote before I comment (so I can use this, and just change the post title by editing), but for now it is quite annoying, and causes my to leave dumb posts like "see below". I rarely low vote an article without leaving a post to explain why, and this seems overkill to deal with a few rude idiots. A "post already made" checkbox, in lieu of a programmatic check would be nice...

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Dmitri Nesteruk
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              It's not very democratic to only expose low votes - it might cause some kind of psychological bias towards higher marks. You'll forgive me if I post low votes without providing a reason, right?

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Dmitri Nesteruk

                It's not very democratic to only expose low votes - it might cause some kind of psychological bias towards higher marks. You'll forgive me if I post low votes without providing a reason, right?

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Chris Maunder
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                The voting system is meant to alert readers to the good stuff, and advise authors on where they need improvement. A vote with no message doesn't help an author. A vote and a 'this is why I voted bad' helps an author improve. A high vote is just a "Thanks - well done!" and doesn't really require a comment suggesting improvements.

                cheers, Chris Maunder

                CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Rob Graham

                  All though I think this is a nice idea, I am not particularly fond of the fact that it seems to be mandatory for 1 and 2 votes, and is not aware of posts already made.  Eventually I'll learn to remember a bout this and vote before I comment (so I can use this, and just change the post title by editing), but for now it is quite annoying, and causes my to leave dumb posts like "see below". I rarely low vote an article without leaving a post to explain why, and this seems overkill to deal with a few rude idiots. A "post already made" checkbox, in lieu of a programmatic check would be nice...

                  Y Offline
                  Y Offline
                  yarp
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  I agree. This should be optionnal. I noticed that since the system has been in use, there are fewer 1 and 2 and much more 3. So instead of being able to note articles with 5 notes, we are actually only using 3. This will just have the side effect to artificially raise the note of recent articles, compared to older ones.

                  Yarp http://www.senosoft.com/

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups