Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Ed Anger: SAY NO TO SAME-SEX IN-LAWS

Ed Anger: SAY NO TO SAME-SEX IN-LAWS

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
com
14 Posts 7 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    You're an idiot.

    I Offline
    I Offline
    Ilion
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    EliottA wrote:

    You're an idiot.

    But you're a fool. And an idiot cannot help but be an idiot, whereas a fool chooses to be a fool.

    L B 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • I Ilion

      EliottA wrote:

      You're an idiot.

      But you're a fool. And an idiot cannot help but be an idiot, whereas a fool chooses to be a fool.

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Does anyone else grow tired of rhetoric or is it only me?

      I O 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Does anyone else grow tired of rhetoric or is it only me?

        I Offline
        I Offline
        Ilion
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        EliottA wrote:

        Does anyone else grow tired of rhetoric or is it only me?

        I don't do rhetoric, sonny-boy, I do logic. It's neither my fault nor my problem that you stick your tits in the wringer and then squeal at the pinching.

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Does anyone else grow tired of rhetoric or is it only me?

          O Offline
          O Offline
          Oakman
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          EliottA wrote:

          Does anyone else grow tired of rhetoric or is it only me?

          Then stop answering his posts - vote to remove 'em and move on.

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Ilion

            EliottA wrote:

            You're an idiot.

            But you're a fool. And an idiot cannot help but be an idiot, whereas a fool chooses to be a fool.

            B Offline
            B Offline
            BoneSoft
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            So... You're saying you can't help it? Idiot[^] 1. an utterly foolish or senseless person. 2. Psychology. a person of the lowest order in a former classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25. Fool[^] 1. a silly or stupid person; a person who lacks judgment or sense. 2. a professional jester, formerly kept by a person of royal or noble rank for amusement: the court fool. 3. a person who has been tricked or deceived into appearing or acting silly or stupid: to make a fool of someone. 4. an ardent enthusiast who cannot resist an opportunity to indulge an enthusiasm (usually prec. by a present participle): He's just a dancing fool. 5. a weak-minded or idiotic person. (I added italics to emphasize qualities you frequently exibit ;) ) You're making up your own definitions again. And again, let me point out that when you have your own definitions for every word in the language, it makes communication not only impossible, but completely confusing for those who don't yet know that you learned English from the back of a box of Cracker Jacks. But I will give you credit for your admittance of idiocy, though it doesn't mean much having no idea what your definition of "idiot" means.


            Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

            R I 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • B BoneSoft

              So... You're saying you can't help it? Idiot[^] 1. an utterly foolish or senseless person. 2. Psychology. a person of the lowest order in a former classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25. Fool[^] 1. a silly or stupid person; a person who lacks judgment or sense. 2. a professional jester, formerly kept by a person of royal or noble rank for amusement: the court fool. 3. a person who has been tricked or deceived into appearing or acting silly or stupid: to make a fool of someone. 4. an ardent enthusiast who cannot resist an opportunity to indulge an enthusiasm (usually prec. by a present participle): He's just a dancing fool. 5. a weak-minded or idiotic person. (I added italics to emphasize qualities you frequently exibit ;) ) You're making up your own definitions again. And again, let me point out that when you have your own definitions for every word in the language, it makes communication not only impossible, but completely confusing for those who don't yet know that you learned English from the back of a box of Cracker Jacks. But I will give you credit for your admittance of idiocy, though it doesn't mean much having no idea what your definition of "idiot" means.


              Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Rob Graham
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Please don't insult Cracker Jacks.

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B BoneSoft

                So... You're saying you can't help it? Idiot[^] 1. an utterly foolish or senseless person. 2. Psychology. a person of the lowest order in a former classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25. Fool[^] 1. a silly or stupid person; a person who lacks judgment or sense. 2. a professional jester, formerly kept by a person of royal or noble rank for amusement: the court fool. 3. a person who has been tricked or deceived into appearing or acting silly or stupid: to make a fool of someone. 4. an ardent enthusiast who cannot resist an opportunity to indulge an enthusiasm (usually prec. by a present participle): He's just a dancing fool. 5. a weak-minded or idiotic person. (I added italics to emphasize qualities you frequently exibit ;) ) You're making up your own definitions again. And again, let me point out that when you have your own definitions for every word in the language, it makes communication not only impossible, but completely confusing for those who don't yet know that you learned English from the back of a box of Cracker Jacks. But I will give you credit for your admittance of idiocy, though it doesn't mean much having no idea what your definition of "idiot" means.


                Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                I Offline
                I Offline
                Ilion
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                BoneSoft wrote:

                So... You're saying you can't help it?

                If you *really* are so stupid as you're acting, then you cannot ever grasp what I said. And if you're not so stupid, you already grasp it.

                B 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • I Ilion

                  EliottA wrote:

                  Does anyone else grow tired of rhetoric or is it only me?

                  I don't do rhetoric, sonny-boy, I do logic. It's neither my fault nor my problem that you stick your tits in the wringer and then squeal at the pinching.

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  soap brain
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Ilíon wrote:

                  I don't do rhetoric, sonny-boy, I do logic.

                  Logic, huh? OK then, how many people should there be at a party so that the probability of at least 2 of them sharing a birthday is 1/2?

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Rob Graham

                    Please don't insult Cracker Jacks.

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    BoneSoft
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    You're right, it was a tragic choice of words, and it won't happen again. :-D


                    Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • I Ilion

                      BoneSoft wrote:

                      So... You're saying you can't help it?

                      If you *really* are so stupid as you're acting, then you cannot ever grasp what I said. And if you're not so stupid, you already grasp it.

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      BoneSoft
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Ilíon wrote:

                      then you cannot ever grasp what I said

                      Yeah yeah yeah, I'm stupid and you're brilliant. Let's not go through the same old re-runs and just say we did. :rolleyes:


                      Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S soap brain

                        Ilíon wrote:

                        I don't do rhetoric, sonny-boy, I do logic.

                        Logic, huh? OK then, how many people should there be at a party so that the probability of at least 2 of them sharing a birthday is 1/2?

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Dalek Dave
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        23?

                        ------------------------------------ "The greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the hijacking of morality by religion" Arthur C Clarke

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D Dalek Dave

                          23?

                          ------------------------------------ "The greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the hijacking of morality by religion" Arthur C Clarke

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          soap brain
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Yes.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups