Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Very proud

Very proud

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
18 Posts 7 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    I'm not, personally; if I choose not to read or respond to a troll, I would prefer it to be my choice and not the choice of others (certainly not the choice of a small number of others) Sure - if the post breached guidelines (apparently, for example, using the word 'test*cle' in the lounge is frowned upon) then removal is fine and dandy. But allowing a small number of people to make the decision that a post (esp. in the Soapbox) is simply not to be read by me is just censorship. What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al. Maybe an option could be added to the user options to allow each user to set up a list of 'ignore users' - so if you don't want to read posts by someone,just add 'em to the list without forcing your preferences on other users.

    If I knew then what I know today, then I'd know the same now as I did then - then what would be the point? .\\axxx (That's an 'M')

    I Offline
    I Offline
    Ilion
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Maxxx_ wrote:

    What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al.

    What's wrong is that the so-called troll is not a troll. It's very infuriating to those who cannot abide rational criticism of their cherished (and erroneous) beliefs.

    Maxxx_ wrote:

    What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al.

    And yet, I am the "troll." Amusing, isn't it? Almost as amusing as Fearless Leader's "even-handedness."

    Maxxx_ wrote:

    Illion (sp?)

    One "L"

    L C 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Australia, according to his profile...

      If I knew then what I know today, then I'd know the same now as I did then - then what would be the point? .\\axxx (That's an 'M')

      I Offline
      I Offline
      Ilion
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Maxxx_ wrote:

      Australia, according to his profile...

      ;)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Mycroft Holmes

        It's really weird wanering in here and seeing all the greyed out message removed signs. I can beleive there was a concerted effort to rid the SB of Illion but I can't beleive there are 13 dedicated CPians for EVERY post. I assume Chris has implemented some sort of garbage collector that automatically picks up Troll posts. Although I would have thought stopping them from actually hitting the site may have been feasible it waould not have acted as a warning for others. Wheres my tin hat

        Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

        T Offline
        T Offline
        Tim Craig
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Mycroft Holmes wrote:

        can't beleive there are 13 dedicated CPians for EVERY post.

        I'm not convinced it takes 13. I'm guessing the poster who said it was based it on a post having 12 1's and then he voted to remove and it went away. But both 1 and remove votes score as 1 so there weren't necessarily 12 prior remove votes.

        "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Tim Craig

          Mycroft Holmes wrote:

          can't beleive there are 13 dedicated CPians for EVERY post.

          I'm not convinced it takes 13. I'm guessing the poster who said it was based it on a post having 12 1's and then he voted to remove and it went away. But both 1 and remove votes score as 1 so there weren't necessarily 12 prior remove votes.

          "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Mycroft Holmes
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          He seems to be back so it can't be an auto thingy

          Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Ilion

            Maxxx_ wrote:

            What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al.

            What's wrong is that the so-called troll is not a troll. It's very infuriating to those who cannot abide rational criticism of their cherished (and erroneous) beliefs.

            Maxxx_ wrote:

            What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al.

            And yet, I am the "troll." Amusing, isn't it? Almost as amusing as Fearless Leader's "even-handedness."

            Maxxx_ wrote:

            Illion (sp?)

            One "L"

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            Ilíon wrote:

            rational criticism

            :rolleyes:

            Ilíon wrote:

            their cherished (and erroneous) beliefs

            But when an erroneous belief of yours is challenged, you resort to name calling, that is why you are considered a troll.

            Bob Emmett

            I 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Ilíon wrote:

              rational criticism

              :rolleyes:

              Ilíon wrote:

              their cherished (and erroneous) beliefs

              But when an erroneous belief of yours is challenged, you resort to name calling, that is why you are considered a troll.

              Bob Emmett

              I Offline
              I Offline
              Ilion
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              Bob Emmett wrote:

              But when an erroneous belief of yours is challenged, you resort to name calling, that is why you are considered a troll.

              This is not true, and even you know that it is not true.

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Ilion

                Bob Emmett wrote:

                But when an erroneous belief of yours is challenged, you resort to name calling, that is why you are considered a troll.

                This is not true, and even you know that it is not true.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Ilíon wrote:

                This is not true, and even you know that it is not true.

                If it were not true, I would not have written it.

                Bob Emmett

                I 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Ilíon wrote:

                  This is not true, and even you know that it is not true.

                  If it were not true, I would not have written it.

                  Bob Emmett

                  I Offline
                  I Offline
                  Ilion
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Bob Emmett wrote:

                  If it were not true, I would not have written it.

                  Pshaw![^] It's *always* you "community" types who do that, and then whine (and, of course, lie) when you get it served back to you. You "community" fellows are bullies *and* sissies. And it's just so unfair, isn't it, that I'm neither impressed nor intimidated.

                  modified on Friday, January 16, 2009 4:16 AM

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    I'm not, personally; if I choose not to read or respond to a troll, I would prefer it to be my choice and not the choice of others (certainly not the choice of a small number of others) Sure - if the post breached guidelines (apparently, for example, using the word 'test*cle' in the lounge is frowned upon) then removal is fine and dandy. But allowing a small number of people to make the decision that a post (esp. in the Soapbox) is simply not to be read by me is just censorship. What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al. Maybe an option could be added to the user options to allow each user to set up a list of 'ignore users' - so if you don't want to read posts by someone,just add 'em to the list without forcing your preferences on other users.

                    If I knew then what I know today, then I'd know the same now as I did then - then what would be the point? .\\axxx (That's an 'M')

                    I Offline
                    I Offline
                    Ilion
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    Maxxx_ wrote:

                    Maybe an option could be added to the user options to allow each user to set up a list of 'ignore users' - so if you don't want to read posts by someone,just add 'em to the list without forcing your preferences on other users.

                    They have that option, already, in two forms: 1) self-control [some maturity required] 2) some script written by one of "the comminity" to filter out any post made by posters they think beneith their exalted dignity [has the unfortunate side effect of allowing others to still read the posts if they wish]

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • I Ilion

                      Maxxx_ wrote:

                      What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al.

                      What's wrong is that the so-called troll is not a troll. It's very infuriating to those who cannot abide rational criticism of their cherished (and erroneous) beliefs.

                      Maxxx_ wrote:

                      What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al.

                      And yet, I am the "troll." Amusing, isn't it? Almost as amusing as Fearless Leader's "even-handedness."

                      Maxxx_ wrote:

                      Illion (sp?)

                      One "L"

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Christian Graus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Ilíon wrote:

                      What's wrong is that the so-called troll is not a troll

                      Yes, you are.

                      Ilíon wrote:

                      It's very infuriating to those who cannot abide rational criticism of their cherished (and erroneous) beliefs.

                      You mean name calling when people try to discuss your endless stream of links ?

                      Ilíon wrote:

                      Almost as amusing as Fearless Leader's "even-handedness."

                      A persecution complex is not surprising, I mean, how else do you respond to a community that is united in disregarding you ?

                      Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Mycroft Holmes

                        It's really weird wanering in here and seeing all the greyed out message removed signs. I can beleive there was a concerted effort to rid the SB of Illion but I can't beleive there are 13 dedicated CPians for EVERY post. I assume Chris has implemented some sort of garbage collector that automatically picks up Troll posts. Although I would have thought stopping them from actually hitting the site may have been feasible it waould not have acted as a warning for others. Wheres my tin hat

                        Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

                        O Offline
                        O Offline
                        Oakman
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        Mycroft Holmes wrote:

                        I can beleive there was a concerted effort to rid the SB of Illion but I can't beleive there are 13 dedicated CPians

                        I think that may have changed. I suspect the votes may be weighted now so that Golds and Platinums can shut the door on him more quickly. At any rate, there have been times when I have been 6th or 7th in and his message was grayed when I refreshed the page.

                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          I'm not, personally; if I choose not to read or respond to a troll, I would prefer it to be my choice and not the choice of others (certainly not the choice of a small number of others) Sure - if the post breached guidelines (apparently, for example, using the word 'test*cle' in the lounge is frowned upon) then removal is fine and dandy. But allowing a small number of people to make the decision that a post (esp. in the Soapbox) is simply not to be read by me is just censorship. What's actually WRONG with a troll that annoys you folk so much? There's been many a witty (and abusive) comments left by responders to Illion (sp?) et al. Maybe an option could be added to the user options to allow each user to set up a list of 'ignore users' - so if you don't want to read posts by someone,just add 'em to the list without forcing your preferences on other users.

                          If I knew then what I know today, then I'd know the same now as I did then - then what would be the point? .\\axxx (That's an 'M')

                          O Offline
                          O Offline
                          Oakman
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          whatever you say, Troy.

                          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups