How Has the Gaza conflict affected you [modified]

Rob Graham

8:1. Seems like fair odds to me. Jews tend to be better armed ;P

bulg

8 to 1? how about 1300 to 10?

BoneSoft

Yeah but Muslims welcome the change to blow up 40 or 50 of their own to get 1 Jew. All depends on their physical distribution.

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

pseudonym67 · modified on Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:53 AM

This is just typical ignorant thuggery. The man is an orthodox jew there is a reason he is in this country. ( If you don't know it look it up ) In a way I alway feel sorry for the orthodox jews in England especially in London as I live not far from orthodox jewish community but whenever Isreal commits its atrocities in gaza etc they are always the ones who kop the shit from ignorant thugs who dont understand that it is nothing to do with them. As for personally I will no longer watch any bbc programs due to its bias in refusing to air a charity appeal in aid of the innocent civilians of gaza when it had no problem broadcasting the lies of the Isrealli government. In fact if it wasnt illegal I would no longer pay for my bbc subscription. Let the one votes begin because I wasnt licking Isreals arse.

pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Beginning KDevelop Programming[^]

Rob Graham

Ok, here's a 1 for ya then. {edit} Damn, I missed. {/edit}

Oakman

BoneSoft wrote:

Yeah but Muslims welcome the change to blow up 40 or 50 of their own to get 1 Jew.

You probably could have punctuated that sentence by putting a period after "up."

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

Oakman

pseudonym67 wrote:

As for personally I will no longer watch any bbc programs due to its bias in refusing to air a charity appeal in aid of the innocent civilians of gaza when it had no problem broadcasting the lies of the Isrealli government.

I thought it was great that Auntie developed some balls.

pseudonym67 wrote:

Let the one votes begin because I wasnt licking Isreals arse.

Nope, you have your tongue firmly up Ahmed Yassin's asshole. How's the taste?

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

BoneSoft

Or I could have typed "chance" like I'd meant to do. :-D But yeah, that would be a nice place for a period too.

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

DRHuff

pseudonym67 wrote:

In fact if it wasnt illegal I would no longer pay for my bbc subscription.

:wtf: How much is your forced subscription? And who ever thought it was a good idea? (We have the CBC here which is subsidized by taxes and i guess it amounts to the same thing but do you actually have a separate bill for it?)

I'm pretty sure I would not like to live in a world in which I would never be offended. I am absolutely certain I don't want to live in a world in which you would never be offended. Dave

Brady Kelly

Who? Iran?

All Sorted

pseudonym67

We have to pay I think its about a £100 a year ( Its a direct debit thing cant change it or do anything about so I havent kept up with the increases ) Officially its called a t.v. licence which allows us to own and operate a t.v. it also pays for the bbc.

pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Beginning KDevelop Programming[^]

pseudonym67

Oooohhh abuse from Oakman but then lets face it thats about as easy to get as being called intellectually dishonest from illiot, all you have to do is disagree. The only difference between you and the thugs in the above piece is side.

pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Beginning KDevelop Programming[^]

hairy_hats · modified on Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:53 AM

Of course it wasn't justified. Was the attack on this doctor[^] justified? Were Palestinian rocket attacks justified? Was Israel grabbing land from outside its original agreed borders justified? I don't think there is a single yes/no answer to today's actions because past events are so complicated.

Oakman

pseudonym67 wrote:

but then lets face it thats about as easy to get as being called intellectually dishonest from illiot

You remind me so much of him - especially in the way you run around unavoting anyone who disagrees with you. By the way, it's "by illiot," not "from illiot."

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

Oakman

Steve_Harris wrote:

Was Israel grabbing land from outside its original agreed borders justified?

Absolutely. Most of the borders in the Middle East, and in much of the rest of the world, were determined by the victors after a war. Why should Israel play nice when no-one else does?

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

hairy_hats

So it would also be OK for the neighbouring countries including Palestine to attack Israel to get it back?

Oakman

Steve_Harris wrote:

So it would also be OK for the neighbouring countries including Palestine to attack Israel to get it back?

Attacking Israel was how they lost land in the first place. In all three of the major wars between Israel in its neighbors, the Arabs struck first, and in every case they discovered that Israel was a tougher nut to crack than they had bargained for. The one thing those countries don't want and can't withstand would be another war with Israel.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

hairy_hats

Their land was appropriated illegally in the first place, and given to Israel after WWII, so they are only trying to get back what was theirs. In any case, even if you attack another country it doesn't give that country the right to steal your land.

Oakman

Steve_Harris wrote:

Their land was appropriated illegally in the first place,

Take it up with Britain and France, or Turkey if you are looking for how we got where we are. Britain and France appropriated the Ottoman Empire's holdings in and around Palestine after WWI. Thirty years later, Britain turned their Palestine mandate over to what would become Israel and what would become Jordan. When they did so, they placed about 700,000 Arabs under Israeli rule and about 600,000 Jews under Jordanian rule. Should the Jews whose lands were (by your definition) illegally taken from them by Jordan have them returned? Should Jordan (which got about 75 of Palestine) be forced to give the land it (again by your definition) illegally occupied after the British pulled out and which should have created a Palestinian state?

Steve_Harris wrote:

In any case, even if you attack another country it doesn't give that country the right to steal your land.

Actually, it pretty much gives them the right to do anything they damn well please. As Mao said, "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." You may not like that. You may wish it was different. But if you start acting like it isn't true, you're likely to end up staring down that barrel.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

hairy_hats

I do blame what happened on Britain and France for doing it, and for the League of Nations for sanctioning it. As Israel and its neighbours have attacked each other in the past under your rules that pretty much gives all of them free rein to do anything to each other, which isn't going to bring peace. Sooner or later, they have to sit down and talk, regardless of what they've done in the past. Better to do that before thousands die through violence, isn't it?