I don't know what to say about this! [modified]

Dalek Dave

Expertsexchange?[^] I mean, 16! Hey ho, but someone may be in for a shock in a few years.

------------------------------------ "Your manuscript is both good and original. But the part that is good is not original, and the part that is original is not good." Dr Samuel Johnson

modified on Wednesday, February 4, 2009 11:56 AM

TommyTomToms · modified on Wednesday, February 4, 2009 11:56 AM

I almost thought you where talking about http://www.experts-exchange.com/[^] Now i see the purpose of a hypen :~

A dogged, arrogant belief in self and the childlike idealism that comes with not knowing my limits. This is my greatest blessing, my priceless attribute.

Pierre Leclercq · modified on Wednesday, February 4, 2009 11:56 AM

This is definitely not kid sister safe. So please move it to the soapbox. So they've added a button to vote to remove messages, they should add one to move a message automatically to the soapbox.

You can't turn lead into gold, unless you've built yourself a nuclear plant.

Dalek Dave

Not KSS? I dunno it is only about someone with a medical condition that has been cured(?) I just think it odd that they would consider such action at that age. Perhaps one of the Hamsters would be kind enough to move it across?

Pierre Leclercq wrote:

they should add one to move a message automatically to the soapbox.

Perhaps not a bad idea, SUGGESTIONS perhaps. Not exactly censorship, but Alternate Location.

------------------------------------ "Your manuscript is both good and original. But the part that is good is not original, and the part that is original is not good." Dr Samuel Johnson

R Giskard Reventlov

Grow up.

me, me, me

Baconbutty

Looks like they have undergone the "KnackerSchnippen" operation.

My new favourite phrase - "misdirected leisure activity"

Dalek Dave

Tick, VG Her name is Kim Petras An anagram of Prik Meats Go figure!

------------------------------------ "Your manuscript is both good and original. But the part that is good is not original, and the part that is original is not good." Dr Samuel Johnson

Pierre Leclercq

Come on! I am talking about KSS rule. I remember some messages being labeled as not KSS, that were less unsafe. Would you really enjoy discussing this kind of topic with your kid sister? X|

You can't turn lead into gold, unless you've built yourself a nuclear plant.

Dalek Dave

I take the point, and I didn't 1 vote you either. It was not meant as a contentious issue post, merely an item on what is being done, and the fact that it can be. Incidentally, do you know which country has the highest number of Sexchange Operations? Answer: Thailand, then in second place, Iran!

------------------------------------ "Your manuscript is both good and original. But the part that is good is not original, and the part that is original is not good." Dr Samuel Johnson

Brady Kelly · modified on Wednesday, February 4, 2009 11:56 AM

There isn't much shocking left on Kim. Now just pretending to be a girl she could have given someone a shock. :~

Mustafa Ismail Mustafa

I am certain Kuwait is on the top 5 list. Where I worked for two years, I met no less than 3 previously-men who decided that they'd rather be women and had sexchange operations.

Don't forget to vote if the response was helpful

Sig history "dad" Ishmail-Samuel Mustafa Unix is a Four Letter Word, and Vi is a Two Letter Abbreviation

hairy_hats

Dalek Dave wrote:

Iran

Why bother? No-one can tell what shape you are under a burka.

Brady Kelly

Pierre Leclercq wrote:

This is definitely not kid sister safe.

Please... There is no profanity, nothing about sex, nothing about drugs. Just an individual having life changing surgery. I sure feel for anyone's kid sister that has to find out from her enlightened, and probably laughing, peers what a sex change is.

Dan Neely · modified on Wednesday, February 4, 2009 11:56 AM

As long as the shrinks are willing to sign off on it, I don't have a problem with it. We can redesign a persons plumbing, we can't rewire their brain (setting aside the ethical question of if we should).

Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

Rage

Pierre Leclercq wrote:

kid sister safe

My kid sister just turned 16 and she he is plenty aware that ... oh, forget it. :)

I'm waiting for Windows Feng Shui, where you have to re-arrange your icons in a manner which best enables your application to run. Richard Jones www.immo-brasseurs.com

Dalek Dave

dan neely wrote:

can't rewire their brain

We can you know! Just not well at the moment, but I would give some of the Linkposters here a Frontal Lobotomy. (arrghhh too late, it seems they had it done years ago)

------------------------------------ "Your manuscript is both good and original. But the part that is good is not original, and the part that is original is not good." Dr Samuel Johnson

Rage

Dalek Dave wrote:

which country

I believe there are q few countries out there where it is much, well, better, to be a man that a women.

I'm waiting for Windows Feng Shui, where you have to re-arrange your icons in a manner which best enables your application to run. Richard Jones www.immo-brasseurs.com

Dalek Dave

:laugh:

------------------------------------ "Your manuscript is both good and original. But the part that is good is not original, and the part that is original is not good." Dr Samuel Johnson

LittleYellowBird

Pierre Leclercq wrote:

Would you really enjoy discussing this kind of topic with your kid sister?

It wouldn't bother me, or discussing it with my kid brother either before you ask. :-D

Ali

Pierre Leclercq

Awright, so I will do some real profanities then, and this thread will be moved to the soapbox.

void func()
{
::MessageBox(NULL, L"func", L"", MB_OK);
}

void func1()
{
::MessageBox(NULL, L"func1", L"", MB_OK);
}

void func2()
{
::MessageBox(NULL, L"func2", L"", MB_OK);
}

void (*metafunc1())()
{
return func;
}

void (*metafunc2())()
{
return func1;
}

void (*metafunc3())()
{
return func2;
}

void main()
{
void (*(*ptr[])())() =
{
metafunc1,
metafunc2,
metafunc3
};

(\*ptr\[0\])()();
(\*ptr\[1\])()();
(\*ptr\[2\])()();

}

So is this rude enough now ? I can do worse if you are not convinced.

You can't turn lead into gold, unless you've built yourself a nuclear plant.