Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. Problem with Array of char*

Problem with Array of char*

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
helpdata-structuresquestion
19 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E error1408

    Your right, I get a char* name as a parameter and use it to call the function. Thats the cause of the crash. But how do I solve this problem? I have this char *name and it has to be tokenized. How can I do that as strtok crashes with it? Btw. thanks for your help, I would have never thought of THAT ^^

    C Offline
    C Offline
    CPallini
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    well, if you really need to use that fucntion, then you may assign the array the way I shown in my previous post, or do someting like:

    char * name;
    name = _strdup("system.fullscreen");
    if ( name )
    {
    strtoken(name, ".", token);
    free(name); // don't forget to free memory
    }

    :)

    If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
    This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
    [My articles]

    E 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C CPallini

      well, if you really need to use that fucntion, then you may assign the array the way I shown in my previous post, or do someting like:

      char * name;
      name = _strdup("system.fullscreen");
      if ( name )
      {
      strtoken(name, ".", token);
      free(name); // don't forget to free memory
      }

      :)

      If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
      This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
      [My articles]

      E Offline
      E Offline
      error1408
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      But if I call it with that char* it crashes! I have a function

      doSomething(char *name)
      {
      [...]
      strtoken(name, ".", token); //crashes
      }

      That works but it does not help me:

      doSomething(char *name)
      {
      [...]
      char foo[] = "hello.world";
      strtoken(foo, ".", token); //does NOT crash
      }

      But how can I use strtoken with char *name? Can I make a char foo[] out of char *name?

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E error1408

        But if I call it with that char* it crashes! I have a function

        doSomething(char *name)
        {
        [...]
        strtoken(name, ".", token); //crashes
        }

        That works but it does not help me:

        doSomething(char *name)
        {
        [...]
        char foo[] = "hello.world";
        strtoken(foo, ".", token); //does NOT crash
        }

        But how can I use strtoken with char *name? Can I make a char foo[] out of char *name?

        C Offline
        C Offline
        CPallini
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        if you really need to pass a constant string to doSomething, the you may write (as already suggested)

        doSomething(char * name)
        {
        //...
        char * name_writable_copy = _strdup( name );
        if ( name_writable_copy )
        {
        strtoken(name_writable_copy, ".", token);
        free( name_writable_copy );
        }
        else
        {
        // handle (unusual) allocation error
        }
        }

        The above code shouldn't crash. :)

        If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
        This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
        [My articles]

        E 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C CPallini

          if you really need to pass a constant string to doSomething, the you may write (as already suggested)

          doSomething(char * name)
          {
          //...
          char * name_writable_copy = _strdup( name );
          if ( name_writable_copy )
          {
          strtoken(name_writable_copy, ".", token);
          free( name_writable_copy );
          }
          else
          {
          // handle (unusual) allocation error
          }
          }

          The above code shouldn't crash. :)

          If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
          This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
          [My articles]

          E Offline
          E Offline
          error1408
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          Ok thx. I will try it in the evening today and post my results.

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E error1408

            Ok thx. I will try it in the evening today and post my results.

            C Offline
            C Offline
            CPallini
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            Well, good luck! :)

            If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
            This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
            [My articles]

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E error1408

              Ok look, here is the full function (that I did NOT write myself) which should work correct, but I think >>I<< do something NOT correct. Its a tokenizer for char-strings

              int strtoken(char *str, char *separator, char *token[])
              {
              int i = 0;

              	token\[0\] = strtok(str, separator); //This line crashes
              
              	while ( token\[i\] ) 
              	{
              		i++;
              		token\[i\] = strtok(NULL, separator);
              	}
              	return ( i );
              }
              

              And I call it that way atm:

              		char \*token\[256\]; //I think that is an array of char\*, isn't it?
              		for(int i = 0; i < 256; i++)
              		{
              			token\[i\] = '\\0';
              		}
              		Helper::instance()->strtoken(name, ".", token);
              

              name is a char* e.g. "system.fullscreen"

              D Offline
              D Offline
              David Crow
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              error1408 wrote:

              Helper::instance()->strtoken(name, ".", token);

              How about something like:

              char *temp = new char[strlen(name) + 1];
              strcpy(temp, name);
              Helper::instance()->strtoken(temp, ".", token);

              "Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown

              "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

              E 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D David Crow

                error1408 wrote:

                Helper::instance()->strtoken(name, ".", token);

                How about something like:

                char *temp = new char[strlen(name) + 1];
                strcpy(temp, name);
                Helper::instance()->strtoken(temp, ".", token);

                "Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown

                "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

                E Offline
                E Offline
                error1408
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                DavidCrow wrote:

                How about something like: char *temp = new char[strlen(name) + 1]; strcpy(temp, name); Helper::instance()->strtoken(temp, ".", token);

                Ok this works! But I don't understand why...could someone explain it to me? Why does the param char * not work but the char * thats created here? Btw. I have to DELETE the char *temp afterwards, right?

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E error1408

                  DavidCrow wrote:

                  How about something like: char *temp = new char[strlen(name) + 1]; strcpy(temp, name); Helper::instance()->strtoken(temp, ".", token);

                  Ok this works! But I don't understand why...could someone explain it to me? Why does the param char * not work but the char * thats created here? Btw. I have to DELETE the char *temp afterwards, right?

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  David Crow
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  error1408 wrote:

                  Why does the param char * not work but the char * thats created here?

                  Work through this:

                  void main( void )
                  {
                  char *abc = "First";
                  char xyz[] = "Last";

                  abc\[0\] = '1';
                  xyz\[0\] = '2';
                  

                  }

                  error1408 wrote:

                  Btw. I have to DELETE the char *temp afterwards, right?

                  Correct (since it points to heap memory).

                  "Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown

                  "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

                  E 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D David Crow

                    error1408 wrote:

                    Why does the param char * not work but the char * thats created here?

                    Work through this:

                    void main( void )
                    {
                    char *abc = "First";
                    char xyz[] = "Last";

                    abc\[0\] = '1';
                    xyz\[0\] = '2';
                    

                    }

                    error1408 wrote:

                    Btw. I have to DELETE the char *temp afterwards, right?

                    Correct (since it points to heap memory).

                    "Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown

                    "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

                    E Offline
                    E Offline
                    error1408
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Ok I think I got it. So is it right, that in my case I can not know if the char *name that I get is a literal or not so to be sure it's not I have to create a temp array?

                    D I 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • E error1408

                      Ok I think I got it. So is it right, that in my case I can not know if the char *name that I get is a literal or not so to be sure it's not I have to create a temp array?

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      David Crow
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      error1408 wrote:

                      ...I can not know if the char *name that I get is a literal or not so to be sure it's not I have to create a temp array?

                      You'll notice in my example that both variables pointed to a string literal, yet only one of them could be changed. Therein lies the difference between a char* vs. char[]. See here for more.

                      "Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown

                      "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • E error1408

                        Ok I think I got it. So is it right, that in my case I can not know if the char *name that I get is a literal or not so to be sure it's not I have to create a temp array?

                        I Offline
                        I Offline
                        ilostmyid2
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        i agree with the pallini's solution and also david gave a good description. string literals r located in a const part of memory which is not writable. this is why arrays don't cause crash. they're located in heap or stack based on whether u allocate them or use local variables which r both writable parts of memory. there's an API function to determine whether a block of memory or a string is const named AfxIsValidAddress. it may also test whether the block is writable. but if i were u, i would use _strdup anyway, and would pass the arg as const for the caller to make sure that the original version of the passed string is not altered.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups