Darwin's birthday

Ilion

Dalek Dave wrote:

What a Çunt you are

What a misogynist you are ... or, alternately, how you must admire me. I'm going with the former. Your sort never does *really* like women.

73Zeppelin

WTF? I try to reply to your messages but they disappear faster than I can finish typing! :laugh:

Dalek Dave

Ilíon wrote:

I'm going with the former. Your sort never does *really* like women.

We all know that you are the sucker of big cocks, you only type one handed as you are wanking you face off all day, and that you have no friends. still, your message will soon be removed, because everyone here thinks the same as me, and no-one likes you. Not even your parents you pretentious twat.

------------------------------------ "Your manuscript is both good and original. But the part that is good is not original, and the part that is original is not good." Dr Samuel Johnson

Oakman

73Zeppelin wrote:

WTF? I try to reply to your messages but they disappear faster than I can finish typing!

It's part of his master plan. Or masturbation - I'm not quite sure which.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

Ilion

Amusing, isn't it? But don't worry ... The Revolution :laugh: will come; the thugs of "the community" will not have free-reign here forever.

Dalek Dave

Oakman wrote:

It's part of his master plan. Or masturbation - I'm not quite sure which.

We all know which it is! :)

------------------------------------ "Your manuscript is both good and original. But the part that is good is not original, and the part that is original is not good." Dr Samuel Johnson

wolfbinary

Oakman wrote:

Frankly, I suspect that most people who "believe" in evolution have no idea what they are talking about - anymore than those who "disbelieve."

By "believe" I was saying

Oakman wrote:

I accept it as the best theory available to explain the origin of species.

. What have you heard people say is evolution then? I thought the meaning of it was well understood by anyone who took a biology class.:confused: What have people said to you as to why they don't agree with it?

BoneSoft

Do you actually believe that your contributions to these discussion are profound? :rolleyes: :sigh:

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

BoneSoft

It's the 39% who have no opinion that concern me the most. We've become a culture that's too lazy to bother with thinking. :sigh: At least those who don't believe have formed an opinion based on something, though I do find that slightly disturbing. Happily dismissing hundreds of years of science just because of your preachers interpretation of scripture is a little irrespsonsible.

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

Ilion

wolfbinary wrote:

What have you heard people say is evolution then?

The word 'evolution' means "development [of what is already there] over time" (*) and it implies teleology ... which is why St. Chuckie avoided the word. The word was first used in embryology to name the theory that embryos grow from preformed homunculi (in the case of humans) enclosed in the egg or sperm cells; that is, by this old theory, all possible future organisms already exist in miniature within their ancestors. But, hey, you don't even know yourself what you mean by the word; you're using it with multiple meanins simultaneously. (*) Contra the "Darwinsts," the word does *not* mean "change over time."

Ilion

BoneSoft wrote:

Happily dismissing hundreds of years of science just because of your preachers interpretation of scripture is a little irrespsonsible.

What a fool you are. And dishonest, too. For, after all, "science" is not truth. Therefore, to dismiss *any* science, even if the dismissal is done cavalierly, is of no moral importance.

BoneSoft

High praise from you, Thanks! :thumbsup:

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

73Zeppelin

Ilíon wrote:

wolfbinary wrote: What have you heard people say is evolution then? The word 'evolution' means "development [of what is already there] over time" (*) and it implies teleology ... which is why St. Chuckie avoided the word. The word was first used in embryology to name the theory that embryos grow from preformed homunculi (in the case of humans) enclosed in the egg or sperm cells; that is, by this old theory, all possible future organisms already exist in miniature within their ancestors. But, hey, you don't even know yourself what you mean by the word; you're using it with multiple meanins simultaneously. (*) Contra the "Darwinsts," the word does *not* mean "change over time."

As usual[^] you're full of shit. So, which stool are you[^]?

wolfbinary

What ever made you think to find that picture? :laugh:

73Zeppelin

He's full of shit!

wolfbinary

73Zeppelin wrote:

He's full of sh*t!

I know he is, but what I mean is you found that picture by looking it up, I'm assuming. Some of the pictures/games I see here I don't know how you guys find that stuff when you want it. I don't seem to be able to find it when I try.

Ilion

73Zeppelin wrote:

As usual[^] you're full of sh*t. So, which stool are you[^]?

As usual, you're so ignorant ... and so proud to be. Goodness, even Stephen Gould says that you're a proudly ignorant fool[^].

Ilion

wolfbinary wrote:

I know he is,

Then you know nothing, poor thing.

Le centriste

Oakman wrote:

Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

:-D Good one!

0x3c0

I have a philosophical question for you: assuming that mathematics is absolute truth, that physics is the application of mathematics, and that other sciences come from an application of physics, does that mean that the derivation of mathematics is untrue? In other words, do you believe that a logical derivation of truth can be a lie? If not, why?