Mr. President! Governator! Here's the answer
-
Ed Gadziemski wrote:
Stan wants to be a peasant working on a lord's land subject to the rules of serfdom. He believes that would fulfill his Jeffersonian fantasies.
No, thats actually what I'm trying to avoid becoming. And I'm pretty sure that the Shannons have a much longer history of successfully doing so than do the Gadziemskis.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
And I'm pretty sure that the Shannons have a much longer history of successfully doing so than do the Gadziemskis.
Didn't your Daddy work for the WPA? Seems to me you said he called it one of the best jobs he ever had. Is that what you mean by succesfully avoiding being a peon?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
So wait a second ? You agree with SOME levels of government control of people's lives then ? The 'war on drugs' costs your society far more than a policy of allowing some drugs ever could. I personally do not even smoke/drink, but I'd rather not see my tax dollars wasted, people turned into criminals for victimless actions, and people who are addicts, marginalized so they are unable to seek support.
The point is that collectivism leads to exploding budget deficits which leads to rationalizing the legalization of some sort of vice so that we can make a little money off of it so that we can afford more collectivism. Anyone who cannot see whats wrong with that plan is seriously stupid. It ain't gonna work. And you have to be insanely idiotic to believe that it will. The only real question is how long will people continue to entertain this kind of utterly unworkable lunacy? It is berift of even the slightest shred of intelligent insight. When will the simple instinct for self preservation begin to kick in? All I can do is stand with slack jawed bewilderment at the bizarre intellectual rot that pervades my civilization.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
modified on Wednesday, February 25, 2009 10:32 PM
Stan Shannon wrote:
The point is that collectivism leads to exploding budget deficits which leads to rationalizing the legalization of some sort of vice so that we can make a little money off of it so that we can afford more collectivism.
I wonder how many folks said that back in the day when FDR and the Congress may booze legal again. I bet every time you take a sip of beer, you think about how stupid those people were to legalize it.
Stan Shannon wrote:
All I can do is stand with slack jawed bewilderment
Yeah, I bet that is about all you can do.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
The point is that collectivism leads to exploding budget deficits which leads to rationalizing the legalization of some sort of vice so that we can make a little money off of it so that we can afford more collectivism.
I wonder how many folks said that back in the day when FDR and the Congress may booze legal again. I bet every time you take a sip of beer, you think about how stupid those people were to legalize it.
Stan Shannon wrote:
All I can do is stand with slack jawed bewilderment
Yeah, I bet that is about all you can do.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.
-
Oakman wrote:
Stan Shannon wrote: All I can do is stand with slack jawed bewilderment Yeah, I bet that is about all you can do.
I think its been obvious for a long time that Stan's a mouth breather
Josh Gray wrote:
I think its been obvious for a long time that Stan's a mouth breather
Makes him useful in the summer - less flies buzzing around.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
So wait a second ? You agree with SOME levels of government control of people's lives then ? The 'war on drugs' costs your society far more than a policy of allowing some drugs ever could. I personally do not even smoke/drink, but I'd rather not see my tax dollars wasted, people turned into criminals for victimless actions, and people who are addicts, marginalized so they are unable to seek support.
The point is that collectivism leads to exploding budget deficits which leads to rationalizing the legalization of some sort of vice so that we can make a little money off of it so that we can afford more collectivism. Anyone who cannot see whats wrong with that plan is seriously stupid. It ain't gonna work. And you have to be insanely idiotic to believe that it will. The only real question is how long will people continue to entertain this kind of utterly unworkable lunacy? It is berift of even the slightest shred of intelligent insight. When will the simple instinct for self preservation begin to kick in? All I can do is stand with slack jawed bewilderment at the bizarre intellectual rot that pervades my civilization.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
modified on Wednesday, February 25, 2009 10:32 PM
Stan Shannon wrote:
which leads to rationalizing the legalization of some sort of vice so that we can make a little money off of it so that we can afford more collectivism
So, you're a teetotaller ? I am, as it happens, but I don't push my beliefs on others. I take it you do ?
Stan Shannon wrote:
It ain't gonna work.
I've been in favour of legalizing and taxing dope forever. Because it makes sense, regardless of anything else.
Stan Shannon wrote:
The only real question is how long will people continue to entertain this kind of utterly unworkable lunacy?
This is very shrill, but it doesn't make any sort of point. Why is it lunacy ?
Stan Shannon wrote:
When will the simple instinct for self preservation begin to kick in? All I can do is stand with slack jawed bewilderment at the bizarre intellectual rot that pervades my civilization.
You're great at hyperbole. If you have a point, I am listening.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
You agree with SOME levels of government control of people's lives then
Of course he does. Government can control any human behavior that Stan does not engage in - just as long as they lower his taxes.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.
OK, I think I see where the problem is.....
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
-
Josh Gray wrote:
I think its been obvious for a long time that Stan's a mouth breather
Makes him useful in the summer - less flies buzzing around.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.
-
Oakman wrote:
Josh Gray wrote: I think its been obvious for a long time that Stan's a mouth breather Makes him useful in the summer - less flies buzzing around.
There's a joke there somewhere about talking shit
-
So, let me try to follow the sequence here - out of control leftist spending entirely fucks up the economy, and the only way to fix it is taxing out of control leftist social reengineering. Yeah, this is going to end well... Wow, er you guys smart er whut... :rolleyes:
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Because the good ol' Christian Right is always blameless, huh.
-
Ed Gadziemski wrote:
Stan wants to be a peasant working on a lord's land subject to the rules of serfdom. He believes that would fulfill his Jeffersonian fantasies.
No, thats actually what I'm trying to avoid becoming. And I'm pretty sure that the Shannons have a much longer history of successfully doing so than do the Gadziemskis.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
I'm pretty sure that the Shannons have a much longer history of successfully doing so than do the Gadziemskis
Ah, but me dear mother came from the Moores who have a long history of owning Shannon villeins.
-
Back in 1933, FDR needed to increase the income of the US to at least partially balance the record amounts of money he was spending trying to shore up the economy. So he got the 21st Amendment passed, re-legalizing the sale of alcohol in the U.S.of A. (And putting Eliot Ness out of work.) In a year, half a billion dollars had poured into the general coffers of the U.S. States that also taxed the same of alcoholic beverages, likewise were raking in a little dough. By 1936, taxes on alcohol amounted to 13% of the revenues of the U.S! And we weren't paying all those Untouchables' salaries, either. Okay, here's a not very tricking question: What is the largest cash crop grown in America, today? It has more value that wheat and corn put together. The answer is, of course, marijuana. A 2005 analysis by Harvard visiting professor Jeffrey Miron estimates that if the United States legalized marijuana, the country would save $7.7 billion in law enforcement costs and could generated as much as $6.2 billion annually if marijuana were taxed like alcohol or tobacco. Click[^] Marijuana is California's largest cash crop. It's valued at $14 billion annually, or nearly twice the value of the state's grape and vegetable crops combined, according to government statistics. But instead of sharing in this profit center, California spends billions of dollars enforcing laws against growing and selling it. And a billion more, at least, paying to house these hardcore criminal horticulturalists. Maybe Michael Phelps was trying to tell our leaders to tune in, get high, and break even?
Shame it'll never happen, in the UK at least. Just upgraded to a class B, which went against all advice given to the government by their advisers. Along with a new TV campaign which lists the "downsides" - not a single one of which isn't also caused by alcohol, apart from "the giggles", which I fail to see the downside of. There is no good reason for marijuana to be illegal.
He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man
-
Shame it'll never happen, in the UK at least. Just upgraded to a class B, which went against all advice given to the government by their advisers. Along with a new TV campaign which lists the "downsides" - not a single one of which isn't also caused by alcohol, apart from "the giggles", which I fail to see the downside of. There is no good reason for marijuana to be illegal.
He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man
Phannon wrote:
There is no good reason for marijuana to be illegal.
...or heroin or opium. We should legalize it all.
-
Phannon wrote:
There is no good reason for marijuana to be illegal.
...or heroin or opium. We should legalize it all.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
I'm pretty sure that the Shannons have a much longer history of successfully doing so than do the Gadziemskis
Ah, but me dear mother came from the Moores who have a long history of owning Shannon villeins.
Ed Gadziemski wrote:
Ah, but me dear mother came from the Moores who have a long history of owning Shannon villeins.
ROFL!
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.
-
Yup, control it, tax it, it would kill the black market.
He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man
Yup, just like cigarette taxes have killed the cigarette smuggling business. :rolleyes:
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall
-
Yup, just like cigarette taxes have killed the cigarette smuggling business. :rolleyes:
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall
Ok, maybe I worded that a little strongly, but it would have an impact. Prohibition simply does not work. If people want to buy a substance from a street dealer then that would be their choice. Would you rather go to a licensed pub for a beer or buy homebrew from a guy in a hoody because it's cheaper? Do you see my point?
He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man
-
Yup, control it, tax it, it would kill the black market.
He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man
Yeah, because just what the world needs are more people on opiates and dope. The best part is when they drive cars and operate heavy machinery or work at jobs with high importance. I think health care systems have ample capacity to handle the influx of drug patients. I know I just love my taxable income being spent on stuff like that. I don't think taxes are high enough...
-
Oakman wrote:
"If people let government decide which foods they eat and medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." ~ Thomas Jefferson
You're using Jefferson to defend taxing vice to support government over-spending? Weird... The only connection this has to Jefferson is that once the blithering liberal and libertarian idiocy behind it all finally destroys whats left of American civilization altogether, we survivors will be able to reinstitute true Jeffersonian democracy.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
on one hand you say "if you don't work you starve" and then you don't want people saying "this isn't good for you, but we are legalising it, if you take it that's your problem, plus you pay taxes on it". isn't personal responsibility one of the fundamental tenets of the conservative creed ? aren't you contradicting yourself here?
-
Yeah, because just what the world needs are more people on opiates and dope. The best part is when they drive cars and operate heavy machinery or work at jobs with high importance. I think health care systems have ample capacity to handle the influx of drug patients. I know I just love my taxable income being spent on stuff like that. I don't think taxes are high enough...
73Zeppelin wrote:
I don't think taxes are high enough...
relocate to the US of A, we'll soon be able to correct this problem for you.
Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.
-
Back in 1933, FDR needed to increase the income of the US to at least partially balance the record amounts of money he was spending trying to shore up the economy. So he got the 21st Amendment passed, re-legalizing the sale of alcohol in the U.S.of A. (And putting Eliot Ness out of work.) In a year, half a billion dollars had poured into the general coffers of the U.S. States that also taxed the same of alcoholic beverages, likewise were raking in a little dough. By 1936, taxes on alcohol amounted to 13% of the revenues of the U.S! And we weren't paying all those Untouchables' salaries, either. Okay, here's a not very tricking question: What is the largest cash crop grown in America, today? It has more value that wheat and corn put together. The answer is, of course, marijuana. A 2005 analysis by Harvard visiting professor Jeffrey Miron estimates that if the United States legalized marijuana, the country would save $7.7 billion in law enforcement costs and could generated as much as $6.2 billion annually if marijuana were taxed like alcohol or tobacco. Click[^] Marijuana is California's largest cash crop. It's valued at $14 billion annually, or nearly twice the value of the state's grape and vegetable crops combined, according to government statistics. But instead of sharing in this profit center, California spends billions of dollars enforcing laws against growing and selling it. And a billion more, at least, paying to house these hardcore criminal horticulturalists. Maybe Michael Phelps was trying to tell our leaders to tune in, get high, and break even?
Plus if it were legal, we could get high without having to worry about getting arrested and boy that would be fun wouldn't it. But then again, you can't have people all stoned eating Doritos and shit. Those kind of evil monsters deserve to be locked up.
I didn't get any requirements for the signature