Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Word black and racism

Word black and racism

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comtoolsquestiondiscussion
22 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Dalek Dave

    That opens up a whole new can of worms!

    ------------------------------------ "May I introduce Blon Fel-Fotch Pasermeer-Day Slitheen from the planet Raxacoricofallapatorious, known by her friends as Margaret" The Doctor

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Oakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Dalek Dave wrote:

    That opens up a whole new can of worms!

    That's what Martin Luther said when he was forced to deal with the Diet of Worms. Here he is talking about the need for can-openers.[^]

    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D dan sh

      Take a look at this[^] post from Mustafa today. Then came the replies and I could not get the point. It swjam's post that cleared up things. I was amazed to read that the joke might be considered racist. I can't seem to find anything racist in this. This reminds me of my own post[^] which had a discussion with Nish regarding racism. Nish of you are reading this, this is one situation where I dont understand why use of word black was racist. I am off to enjoy Friday. Will not be able to reply tonight. Hope you all have a good time.

      Time is the best teacher; unfortunately it kills all of its students. जय हिंद

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Agreed, it possibly shows the peopel who have a problem with race. For example, why is Obama referred to as black? He has mixed parentage. I'm with Blazing Saddles on this crap BTW!

      Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.

      O 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Agreed, it possibly shows the peopel who have a problem with race. For example, why is Obama referred to as black? He has mixed parentage. I'm with Blazing Saddles on this crap BTW!

        Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Oakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Trollslayer wrote:

        For example, why is Obama referred to as black? He has mixed parentage.

        He self-identifies as black. Do you want to tell him he's wrong?

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D dan sh

          Take a look at this[^] post from Mustafa today. Then came the replies and I could not get the point. It swjam's post that cleared up things. I was amazed to read that the joke might be considered racist. I can't seem to find anything racist in this. This reminds me of my own post[^] which had a discussion with Nish regarding racism. Nish of you are reading this, this is one situation where I dont understand why use of word black was racist. I am off to enjoy Friday. Will not be able to reply tonight. Hope you all have a good time.

          Time is the best teacher; unfortunately it kills all of its students. जय हिंद

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dan Neely
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          .

          Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

          O 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Dan Neely

            .

            Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            The one thing we know is it's a newbie. My balance on your post took his 1 to a 4.2

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D dan sh

              Take a look at this[^] post from Mustafa today. Then came the replies and I could not get the point. It swjam's post that cleared up things. I was amazed to read that the joke might be considered racist. I can't seem to find anything racist in this. This reminds me of my own post[^] which had a discussion with Nish regarding racism. Nish of you are reading this, this is one situation where I dont understand why use of word black was racist. I am off to enjoy Friday. Will not be able to reply tonight. Hope you all have a good time.

              Time is the best teacher; unfortunately it kills all of its students. जय हिंद

              P Offline
              P Offline
              pseudonym67
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              Because some people think about sh*t too mauch and are looking for a chance to take offence. 1. It is racist because it calls the child black and not the current politically correct term which will pretty soon be that 24 year old who was born in the village three miles from the tree two miles up the road north from the capital of Botswana. 2. It is racist because it suggests that white men are inferior to black/coloured/racially differentiated males and suggests that all whites will eventually be cuckoled by them as all white women sectretly desire them.

              pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Beginning KDevelop Programming[^]

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P pseudonym67

                Because some people think about sh*t too mauch and are looking for a chance to take offence. 1. It is racist because it calls the child black and not the current politically correct term which will pretty soon be that 24 year old who was born in the village three miles from the tree two miles up the road north from the capital of Botswana. 2. It is racist because it suggests that white men are inferior to black/coloured/racially differentiated males and suggests that all whites will eventually be cuckoled by them as all white women sectretly desire them.

                pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Beginning KDevelop Programming[^]

                B Offline
                B Offline
                bulg
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                voted down not cause i don't agree with your first point, but because your enumerations were bland.

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O Oakman

                  The one thing we know is it's a newbie. My balance on your post took his 1 to a 4.2

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Dan Neely
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  My univotor might've been but the one that crapped on the rest of the thread was gold since my 5's resulted in 3 averages.

                  Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B bulg

                    voted down not cause i don't agree with your first point, but because your enumerations were bland.

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    pseudonym67
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    voted down for being a dick

                    pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Beginning KDevelop Programming[^]

                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P pseudonym67

                      voted down for being a dick

                      pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Beginning KDevelop Programming[^]

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      bulg
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      not voted down, for being straight to the point ( in this case, penis ), though I question your motives

                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Dalek Dave

                        What is the correct term? Black People? People of Colour? Niggers? I prefer Black People. It is acceptable to Black People and it is clear and unambiguous. People of Colour is also used, but it applies to all who are non white/Chinese. Niggers is a derogatory term that we are supposed to shun, and if that is so then none should use it. However I heave heard one black man say to another, wassup nigger? Now either the word is not used or it is. To say that only one racial group can use it would be racist! I am white, so I understand about being a racial minority. Only 10% of the world is white. Given the mixing of the races, (In itself a misunderstood and misused word), there is really only a spectrum of colour. There are in fact four racial types on the planet, Negroid, Mongoloid, Caucasian and Semitic. Negroid is particularly African, Black, of higher muscle density and carrying certain genetic markers that equip the individual for life in a Malarial Zone. Mongoloid is typically Chinese/Mongolian, but stretches to most of South East Asia, The Innuit and Plains and South American Indians. Marked typically with 'Yellow Skin' which is inaccurate, it merely has a slightly low level of melanine, lower than white people actually, and capilliaries tend to be very slightly deeper, giving the appearance of the yellowness, They tend also, but not exclusively to have an epicanthic eyelid, as indeed do ALL humans, but theirs continues through to birth whereas other races lose it in the womb. Causcasians are 'White' but may be dark, Italian or spanish for example. They are from Europe and the northern middle east and are actually albinos, the blue eyes having evolved as a defense mechanism against the tundra. Semites are an oddity. Occupying the middle east, they include the Jewish nation, the Arab Races and some admixture of others. Generally the main differences tend to be chemical. Blood typing is difficult between Semites and Non Semites, (Semite does not mean Jewish, so anti-semitism merely means against those of a slightly different chemical makeup!). Oddly Iran is a Caucasian nation, Iraq is Arab. I think I have covered all bases ! :laugh:

                        ------------------------------------ "May I introduce Blon Fel-Fotch Pasermeer-Day Slitheen from the planet Raxacoricofallapatorious, known by her friends as Margaret" The Doctor

                        N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Nish Nishant
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        It may interest you that Indians are categorized as Caucasians - both Aryan Indians and Dravidian Indians. So Caucasian does not automatically imply a white-skinned person. You have to say "white Caucasian" if you want to imply that meaning.

                        Regards, Nish


                        Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
                        My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

                        S 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • D dan sh

                          Take a look at this[^] post from Mustafa today. Then came the replies and I could not get the point. It swjam's post that cleared up things. I was amazed to read that the joke might be considered racist. I can't seem to find anything racist in this. This reminds me of my own post[^] which had a discussion with Nish regarding racism. Nish of you are reading this, this is one situation where I dont understand why use of word black was racist. I am off to enjoy Friday. Will not be able to reply tonight. Hope you all have a good time.

                          Time is the best teacher; unfortunately it kills all of its students. जय हिंद

                          N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Nish Nishant
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          I think what some people may have taken as racist about that joke is the fact that the couple were assumed to be white because race wasn't mentioned. The "white"-ness of the couple has to be inferred from the fact that otherwise the joke would not be a joke. Ironically this inference itself is racist - because Indians, Chinese, Latinos etc can all wonder why they were not considered by anyone :-)

                          Regards, Nish


                          Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
                          My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B bulg

                            not voted down, for being straight to the point ( in this case, penis ), though I question your motives

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            pseudonym67
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            lol, no need the names not illiot

                            pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Beginning KDevelop Programming[^]

                            B 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P pseudonym67

                              lol, no need the names not illiot

                              pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Beginning KDevelop Programming[^]

                              B Offline
                              B Offline
                              bulg
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              well I bumped you up to... 2.3. How embarrassing. Maybe I'll spam the forum with random news links to level++ my account

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • N Nish Nishant

                                It may interest you that Indians are categorized as Caucasians - both Aryan Indians and Dravidian Indians. So Caucasian does not automatically imply a white-skinned person. You have to say "white Caucasian" if you want to imply that meaning.

                                Regards, Nish


                                Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
                                My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Sahir Shah
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

                                It may interest you that Indians are categorized as Caucasians - both Aryan Indians and Dravidian Indians.

                                There are also people of australoid, mongoloid and (possibly) negroid race in India. People from the eastern states of India such as Nagaland are Tibeto-Burmese i.e of Mongoloid race. South Indians are largely mixed austroloid and caucasoid. North Indians are predominantly caucasoid in appearance but people of pure caucasian race are rare, you can say the predominant part of the mixture is caucasian. People of South Asia are of largely of mixed race with the exception some isolated tribes such as the Kalash of Hindu-Kush[^] who are said to be a pure (white) caucasian people. There are also some mysteries such as the Kodava[^] of Coorg (in Karnataka state) who look completely different from the surrounding south Indian people. They are like the Iranians in appearance but no one knows where they came from and how they got there. Anyway, people who do not have some kind of mixed ancestry are very rare. Even the royal families of Europe had some african ancestry[^].

                                modified on Saturday, February 28, 2009 8:23 AM

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N Nish Nishant

                                  It may interest you that Indians are categorized as Caucasians - both Aryan Indians and Dravidian Indians. So Caucasian does not automatically imply a white-skinned person. You have to say "white Caucasian" if you want to imply that meaning.

                                  Regards, Nish


                                  Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
                                  My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  Sahir Shah
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  I read somewhere that roaming bands of vigilantes looking for escaped slaves in the US would catch the "high yaller" ones who were trying to pass off as whites by taking off their trousers and looking at their genitals. I am not sure what was it that gave them away, I think it was the color of the genitals or could be the size ;). It is believed that persons of mixed race may look white but will still have dark genitals.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups