Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Washington Post: HOLMES: U.S. backtracks on missile shield

Washington Post: HOLMES: U.S. backtracks on missile shield

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comhelpannouncementlounge
114 Posts 11 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 7 73Zeppelin

    I haven't been following the missile defense story. What I want to know is, of what value is it to the U.S. to have missile batteries in Europe? If Europe wanted to defend itself, they could build their own missile batteries. What value does having missile batteries on distant foreign soil bring to the U.S.? In other words, if Iran fires a missile at Europe, it's Europe's problem, not America's...

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Oakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    73Zeppelin wrote:

    In other words, if Iran fires a missile at Europe, it's Europe's problem, not America's...

    I been saying words to that effect for quite some time. Other than tweaking the bear's nose, there is absolutely nothing in the American interest about defending Poland for Iran or Russia. It's the Cuban Missile Crisis all over again, only this time Putin gets to play the Jack kennedy role.

    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      73Zeppelin wrote:

      In other words, if Iran fires a missile at Europe, it's Europe's problem, not America's...

      Agreed. In fact, I'd take it even further and pull ALL U.S. military personnel, hardware and bases from all foreign countries - Japan, South Korea, Germany, UK, etc... All of it comes home and defends our ports and borders.

      O Offline
      O Offline
      Oakman
      wrote on last edited by
      #17

      Mike Mullikin wrote:

      Agreed. In fact, I'd take it even further and pull ALL U.S. military personnel, hardware and bases from all foreign countries - Japan, South Korea, Germany, UK, etc... All of it comes home and defends our ports and borders.

      I heard today that the U.S. has troops stationed in 130 countries. :wtf: An absolute waste of our blood and our money. Bring 'em home; let the Guard go back to being each State's militia; and if we need a fight, let's annex Mexico. Let the arseholes who talk about America's "moral" responsibility to the rest of the world, tell us about all the battles they fought in or stfu.

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • 7 73Zeppelin

        Mike Mullikin wrote:

        More and more people getting more and more angry every day. Every $ is important and we want to see value for every one spent.

        That's what I thought - it's expensive (monetarily and in human cost) to keep military personnel staffed overseas.

        I Offline
        I Offline
        Ilion
        wrote on last edited by
        #18

        73Zeppelin wrote:

        That's what I thought - it's expensive (monetarily and in human cost) to keep military personnel staffed overseas.

        Of course it is. And the US taxpayer has been carrying "the Europeans," and the Koreans, and the Japanese for far too long and at far too great expense. One major reason "European" politics and polities are so infantile is because the US government has enabled, and possibly intentionally encouraged, such a development. But regardless of the expence of maintaining our committments, radioactive cities, or even the credible thread of radioactive cities, whether in Europe or in America, will be far more expensive.

        O 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Ilion

          Mike Mullikin wrote:

          Agreed. In fact, I'd take it even further and pull ALL U.S. military personnel, hardware and bases from all foreign countries - Japan, South Korea, Germany, UK, etc... All of it comes home and defends our ports and borders.

          "Fotress America" is not viable.

          O Offline
          O Offline
          Oakman
          wrote on last edited by
          #19

          IlĂ­on wrote:

          "Fotress America" is not viable

          You'll fight the bad guys to the last ounce of everybody else's blood?

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            IlĂ­on wrote:

            "Fotress America" is not viable.

            Why not? Canada doesn't have 100's of thousands of troops and billions of dollars of equipment spread all over the world defending ungrateful weasels and they seem to be getting along just fine.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #20

            Since the end of the cold war, Russia not being the threat it once was deemed to be, the United States could easily withdraw to its national boundaries. However, there are political and economic investments that the United States has around the globe so it is understandable that they might also wish a military presence as well, if only to give some measure of security towards those other stated investments. But should the United States at some future time return all of its servicemen etc to home soil, your armed forces may need to be trimmed down in size, there would be no need for such huge numbers unless civil insurgency is a worry to Washington. And I can thus understand the Ilion comment of Fortress America not being viable.

            7 O 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Since the end of the cold war, Russia not being the threat it once was deemed to be, the United States could easily withdraw to its national boundaries. However, there are political and economic investments that the United States has around the globe so it is understandable that they might also wish a military presence as well, if only to give some measure of security towards those other stated investments. But should the United States at some future time return all of its servicemen etc to home soil, your armed forces may need to be trimmed down in size, there would be no need for such huge numbers unless civil insurgency is a worry to Washington. And I can thus understand the Ilion comment of Fortress America not being viable.

              7 Offline
              7 Offline
              73Zeppelin
              wrote on last edited by
              #21

              Ah, good points Richard.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • O Oakman

                73Zeppelin wrote:

                In other words, if Iran fires a missile at Europe, it's Europe's problem, not America's...

                I been saying words to that effect for quite some time. Other than tweaking the bear's nose, there is absolutely nothing in the American interest about defending Poland for Iran or Russia. It's the Cuban Missile Crisis all over again, only this time Putin gets to play the Jack kennedy role.

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #22

                Pre Cuban crisis: Cuba: Russian missiles? No. Turkey: American missiles? Yes. Post Cuba crisis: Cuba: Russian missiles? No. Turkey: American missiles? No. Twas a famous victory.

                Bob Emmett

                O 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • I Ilion

                  73Zeppelin wrote:

                  That's what I thought - it's expensive (monetarily and in human cost) to keep military personnel staffed overseas.

                  Of course it is. And the US taxpayer has been carrying "the Europeans," and the Koreans, and the Japanese for far too long and at far too great expense. One major reason "European" politics and polities are so infantile is because the US government has enabled, and possibly intentionally encouraged, such a development. But regardless of the expence of maintaining our committments, radioactive cities, or even the credible thread of radioactive cities, whether in Europe or in America, will be far more expensive.

                  O Offline
                  O Offline
                  Oakman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  IlĂ­on wrote:

                  But regardless of the expence of maintaining our committments, radioactive cities, or even the credible thread of radioactive cities, whether in Europe or in America, will be far more expensive.

                  Oh please, General LeMay, do tell us about the monolithic commies' plans to take over the world. Thanks for a golden-oldie flashback from 1957, Troy! As a combat vet, as someone who has contacts with some senior officers on active duty and retired, as someone who has studied military history, as someone who thinks about the parlous state of the world, America, and the American military, I would like to thank you for sharing your thoughts. It's always good to know what people who aren't any of those things, are thinking. However, you couldn't be more wrong if you tried.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • I Ilion

                    73Zeppelin wrote:

                    Okay, but what's with the American interest in a European missile shield? Is it simply in support of NATO allies (Czech Republic and Poland)?

                    The American interest is both moral (there are multiple levels on that point) and "Machiavellian" ("Fortress America" is not viable).

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    Both Moral and Machiavellian? :rolleyes:

                    Bob Emmett

                    I 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Pre Cuban crisis: Cuba: Russian missiles? No. Turkey: American missiles? Yes. Post Cuba crisis: Cuba: Russian missiles? No. Turkey: American missiles? No. Twas a famous victory.

                      Bob Emmett

                      O Offline
                      O Offline
                      Oakman
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      Bob Emmett wrote:

                      Twas a famous victory

                      Perception is (almost) everything. Otherwise it'd be the Turkish Missile Crisis and women wouldn't wear padded bras.

                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        73Zeppelin wrote:

                        In other words, if Iran fires a missile at Europe, it's Europe's problem, not America's...

                        Agreed. In fact, I'd take it even further and pull ALL U.S. military personnel, hardware and bases from all foreign countries - Japan, South Korea, Germany, UK, etc... All of it comes home and defends our ports and borders.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        Mike Mullikin wrote:

                        pull ALL U.S. military personnel, hardware and bases from all foreign countries - Japan, South Korea, Germany, UK, etc...

                        When we ceased to be a World Power, we had to relinquish our colonies too... :sigh:

                        Bob Emmett

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Since the end of the cold war, Russia not being the threat it once was deemed to be, the United States could easily withdraw to its national boundaries. However, there are political and economic investments that the United States has around the globe so it is understandable that they might also wish a military presence as well, if only to give some measure of security towards those other stated investments. But should the United States at some future time return all of its servicemen etc to home soil, your armed forces may need to be trimmed down in size, there would be no need for such huge numbers unless civil insurgency is a worry to Washington. And I can thus understand the Ilion comment of Fortress America not being viable.

                          O Offline
                          O Offline
                          Oakman
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                          However, there are political and economic investments that the United States has around the globe so it is understandable that they might also wish a military presence as well, if only to give some measure of security towards those other stated investments.

                          Here's a thought: Let's not get involved in entangling foreign alliances. . .where have I heard that before?[^] By the way, at least in theory, the U.S Government does not make economic investments but leaves that to private companies. I personally find the concept that we would use American troops to defend the interests of Haliburton or Walmart to be less than appetising.

                          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                          L 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • O Oakman

                            Bob Emmett wrote:

                            Twas a famous victory

                            Perception is (almost) everything. Otherwise it'd be the Turkish Missile Crisis and women wouldn't wear padded bras.

                            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #28

                            Oakman wrote:

                            women wouldn't wear padded bras.

                            How do you expect me to concentrate on a serious wind-up?

                            Bob Emmett

                            O 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Mike Mullikin wrote:

                              pull ALL U.S. military personnel, hardware and bases from all foreign countries - Japan, South Korea, Germany, UK, etc...

                              When we ceased to be a World Power, we had to relinquish our colonies too... :sigh:

                              Bob Emmett

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #29

                              Bob Emmett wrote:

                              When we ceased to be a World Power, we had to relinquish our colonies too...

                              It's time we release them or make them states so they can be taxed properly. ;)

                              O 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                Both Moral and Machiavellian? :rolleyes:

                                Bob Emmett

                                I Offline
                                I Offline
                                Ilion
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #30

                                Bob Emmett wrote:

                                Both Moral and ["]Machiavellian["]? :rolleyes:

                                Yes. :rolleyes: yourself.

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • O Oakman

                                  Mike Mullikin wrote:

                                  Agreed. In fact, I'd take it even further and pull ALL U.S. military personnel, hardware and bases from all foreign countries - Japan, South Korea, Germany, UK, etc... All of it comes home and defends our ports and borders.

                                  I heard today that the U.S. has troops stationed in 130 countries. :wtf: An absolute waste of our blood and our money. Bring 'em home; let the Guard go back to being each State's militia; and if we need a fight, let's annex Mexico. Let the arseholes who talk about America's "moral" responsibility to the rest of the world, tell us about all the battles they fought in or stfu.

                                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #31

                                  Oakman wrote:

                                  Let the arseholes who talk about America's "moral" responsibility to the rest of the world

                                  Presumably these are citizens of the USA? Everyone else seems to want either your money or your lives. :sigh:

                                  Bob Emmett

                                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    Bob Emmett wrote:

                                    When we ceased to be a World Power, we had to relinquish our colonies too...

                                    It's time we release them or make them states so they can be taxed properly. ;)

                                    O Offline
                                    O Offline
                                    Oakman
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #32

                                    Mike Mullikin wrote:

                                    It's time we release them or make them states so they can be taxed properly

                                    Even Canada?

                                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      Oakman wrote:

                                      women wouldn't wear padded bras.

                                      How do you expect me to concentrate on a serious wind-up?

                                      Bob Emmett

                                      O Offline
                                      O Offline
                                      Oakman
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #33

                                      Bob Emmett wrote:

                                      How do you expect me to concentrate on a serious wind-up?

                                      Think of bras as support housings for frontal radars ;)

                                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • I Ilion

                                        Bob Emmett wrote:

                                        Both Moral and ["]Machiavellian["]? :rolleyes:

                                        Yes. :rolleyes: yourself.

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #34

                                        I should have guessed: the USA and devious cunning, I haven't seen that in many years. Still got the ruthlessness, though.

                                        Bob Emmett

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Lost User

                                          Oakman wrote:

                                          Let the arseholes who talk about America's "moral" responsibility to the rest of the world

                                          Presumably these are citizens of the USA? Everyone else seems to want either your money or your lives. :sigh:

                                          Bob Emmett

                                          O Offline
                                          O Offline
                                          Oakman
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #35

                                          Bob Emmett wrote:

                                          Presumably these are citizens of the USA? Everyone else seems to want either your money or your lives.

                                          Germany and the UK are paid around 3 billion a year as rent for the American bases in their country. The payrolls for the locals in those two countries alone are gi-normous and the amount of money the American GI spends locally has a major impact on the local economy. The primary purpose of those bases, or so I am told, is to protect the UK and Germany from those countries which might wish to do one or both of them, harm. Of course the love and undying gratitude of the average Brit or German and the total lack of any anti-American prejudice shown to our tourists more than makes up for our investment.

                                          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                          L C 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups