Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. So what's up with this forum

So what's up with this forum

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
question
17 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 0 0x3c0

    From here, it looks like a deal with the devil. Previously, the trolls and morons just gravitated here; eventually someone started to remove messages. Chris closed this forum, renamed it several times, disabled voting and wiped it from the map. Now we just get the trolls; the morons can't find it any more (I bet that by the summer months, many of the morons will have migrated to the new soapbox) So, here is the underbelly of CP. Post what you want (as long as it's allowed by the terms of service), but don't expect a friendly "you aren't quite right" if you mess up. Off topic: 200th post.

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Oakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Computafreak wrote:

    Now we just get the trolls; the morons can't find it any more

    Which should ultimately convince any real trolls to move on. Without morons responding to their bait, they may decide they need to fish in new waters. :thumbsup: For what its worth, I have enjoyed the interactions in the Back Room as much and more than I did in the old SB. Eliminating voting simply removed an irritant that we used because it had been used against us. Chris has essentially created a members-only message board. We can make occasional forays out into SB, jr, and if we see a likely looking candidate invite him to join our band of merry outlaws.

    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

    0 K 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • O Oakman

      Computafreak wrote:

      Now we just get the trolls; the morons can't find it any more

      Which should ultimately convince any real trolls to move on. Without morons responding to their bait, they may decide they need to fish in new waters. :thumbsup: For what its worth, I have enjoyed the interactions in the Back Room as much and more than I did in the old SB. Eliminating voting simply removed an irritant that we used because it had been used against us. Chris has essentially created a members-only message board. We can make occasional forays out into SB, jr, and if we see a likely looking candidate invite him to join our band of merry outlaws.

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

      0 Offline
      0 Offline
      0x3c0
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      I'm probably being a little too cynical here, but the real trolls are unlikely to move on. It takes everybody to ignore someone, but only one person to respond. It's one of the reasons why I preferred being able to nuke posts - before the system got [played|hacked|abused]. I agree that it looks a lot more sensible now; if I ever feel qualified to respond to a post intelligently, I think that I would respond a lot more frequently. But ultimately, without backing up the actions taken recently, it isn't going to change significantly in the long term

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • O Oakman

        Computafreak wrote:

        Now we just get the trolls; the morons can't find it any more

        Which should ultimately convince any real trolls to move on. Without morons responding to their bait, they may decide they need to fish in new waters. :thumbsup: For what its worth, I have enjoyed the interactions in the Back Room as much and more than I did in the old SB. Eliminating voting simply removed an irritant that we used because it had been used against us. Chris has essentially created a members-only message board. We can make occasional forays out into SB, jr, and if we see a likely looking candidate invite him to join our band of merry outlaws.

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

        K Offline
        K Offline
        kmg365
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        Oakman wrote:

        occasional forays out into SB, jr, and if we see a likely looking candidate invite him to join our band of merry outlaws

        quasi-trolls, or irritable irascible argumentative curmudgeons who don't call names...well like every one here?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Ilion

          kmg365 wrote:

          where the paramter 'excessive' has not been quantified?

          Just so.

          K Offline
          K Offline
          kmg365
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          I suspect that Obama bashing more than CSS drivel threw things over the top.

          I 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K kmg365

            I suspect that Obama bashing more than CSS drivel threw things over the top.

            I Offline
            I Offline
            Ilion
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            kmg365 wrote:

            I suspect that Obama bashing more than CSS drivel threw things over the top.

            No one is "bashing" of Obama, though some of us are criticising nearly everything about him and his agenda for remaking America into what it is not. It appears that what put things over the top is that somehow, for a few hours, "the community" were experiencing having all their posts vanished, just as they have been doing to me for the past few months (and as they did to me a couple of years ago). Mr Maunder didn't/doesn't appear to mind that "the community's" method of "argument" amounts to nothing more than "Yer stoopid." Mr Maunder didn't/doesn't appear to mind that "the community's" response when "Yer stoopid" doesn't do the trick is to vanish posts. Mr Maunder *does* appear to mind when "the community" gets back its own medicine.

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • I Ilion

              kmg365 wrote:

              I suspect that Obama bashing more than CSS drivel threw things over the top.

              No one is "bashing" of Obama, though some of us are criticising nearly everything about him and his agenda for remaking America into what it is not. It appears that what put things over the top is that somehow, for a few hours, "the community" were experiencing having all their posts vanished, just as they have been doing to me for the past few months (and as they did to me a couple of years ago). Mr Maunder didn't/doesn't appear to mind that "the community's" method of "argument" amounts to nothing more than "Yer stoopid." Mr Maunder didn't/doesn't appear to mind that "the community's" response when "Yer stoopid" doesn't do the trick is to vanish posts. Mr Maunder *does* appear to mind when "the community" gets back its own medicine.

              S Offline
              S Offline
              soap brain
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              Ilíon wrote:

              Mr Maunder *does* appear to mind when "the community" gets back its own medicine.

              Do you really believe that that's the reason? :confused:

              I 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S soap brain

                Ilíon wrote:

                Mr Maunder *does* appear to mind when "the community" gets back its own medicine.

                Do you really believe that that's the reason? :confused:

                I Offline
                I Offline
                Ilion
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                Do you really believe that that's the reason? :confused:

                Your :confused: is your own fault (as usual). I stated a plain observation, I made no attempt to explain it.

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • I Ilion

                  Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                  Do you really believe that that's the reason? :confused:

                  Your :confused: is your own fault (as usual). I stated a plain observation, I made no attempt to explain it.

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  soap brain
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  Don't care. What I AM interested in is you proving you're smarter than the peer-review process and thousands of biologists.

                  I 7 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • S soap brain

                    Don't care. What I AM interested in is you proving you're smarter than the peer-review process and thousands of biologists.

                    I Offline
                    I Offline
                    Ilion
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                    What I AM interested in is you proving you're smarter than the peer-review process and thousands of biologists.

                    Which is to say, you're not interested in *reasoning* (and doing so honestly and validly) but rather in "authority" and the assertion thereof. Which is, of course, why you kiddies want to silence me.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • I Ilion

                      Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                      What I AM interested in is you proving you're smarter than the peer-review process and thousands of biologists.

                      Which is to say, you're not interested in *reasoning* (and doing so honestly and validly) but rather in "authority" and the assertion thereof. Which is, of course, why you kiddies want to silence me.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      soap brain
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      I'm still waiting.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S soap brain

                        Don't care. What I AM interested in is you proving you're smarter than the peer-review process and thousands of biologists.

                        7 Offline
                        7 Offline
                        73Zeppelin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        Questioning authority is fine. Questioning Gods actions is taboo. Oh, wait. That doesn't seem to make sense.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • 7 73Zeppelin

                          Questioning authority is fine. Questioning Gods actions is taboo. Oh, wait. That doesn't seem to make sense.

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          soap brain
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          We call that the Zeppelin Paradox. It demonstrates the contradictions that arise with our choice of axioms. Since God is real, we can thus conclude that reality isn't.

                          7 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S soap brain

                            We call that the Zeppelin Paradox. It demonstrates the contradictions that arise with our choice of axioms. Since God is real, we can thus conclude that reality isn't.

                            7 Offline
                            7 Offline
                            73Zeppelin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            And free will doesn't exist, since if it did, God wouldn't be omnipotent/omniscient. Well that and that whole Deus ex machina thingy...

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • 7 73Zeppelin

                              And free will doesn't exist, since if it did, God wouldn't be omnipotent/omniscient. Well that and that whole Deus ex machina thingy...

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              soap brain
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              And aliens exist, since if they didn't, my great-uncle Ted would be a liar. And evolution is wrong, since if it was right, I wouldn't like it. And the Holocaust never happened, since if it did, my great-uncle Ted would be a liar.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups