Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Here's your money, Mr. Trump

Here's your money, Mr. Trump

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
com
29 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • O Oakman

    Richard A. Abbott wrote:

    Hope you don't mind this OT question

    Not in the slightest. Inappetance can be a sign of a cat not feeling well. One that, usually, it's extremely wise for an owner to pay attention to since usually cats hide illness as long as they can. HOWEVER. Some cats just are fussy eaters. Some will eat only dry food, others want it as moist as they could get it in the jungle they came from 5,000 years ago. The big question to ask yourself -- and your vet, when he goes in to be snipped -- is: is he thriving on the food he's eating? If he's energetic and gaining weight (he should gain a fair amount in the first year of his life) you're likely not to have problems. If he's listless, irritable, and very skinny in the flanks, then you need to have the vet do an exam - and definitely make sure to get his blood worked up. There are many, many problems that can be diagnosed by the readings you get that way. Forget milk - it's bad for 'em and upsets their tummies. (Have you ever heard of a lion or a tiger milking a cow?) When feeding, don't leave wet food out for more'n a couple of hours. You aren't going to convince your cat to eat when it's unappetizing, what he didn't eat when its was fresh. Besides, he'll learn to eat more, more quickly, if food isn't something he can count on being there 24/7 You should buy quality cat food. The bargain brands aren't a bargain when you have to throw them away. Don't feed them dog food (it lacks taurine which is necessary to a cat's health) and don't feed them table scraps. They are unable to handle salt the way we can and onion is a poison for them. Whatever you do, make it clear to your daughter that chocolates will kill him very quickly. So will aspirin, by the way. Also make sure she isn't feeding him while you are away. Once he's neutered, he's like to become a bit more likely to eat, by the way. It's the only basic pleasure he has left. ;) Good on you for getting him neutered, by the way. Too many cats live brutish lives and die painful detahs because there are too many of 'em.

    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    Thank you Jon for your reply. The cat is very active and playful when its not sleeping. Whiskers and Go-Cat brand leader cat foods is what I've mainly tried. Perhaps I'll try only giving it half a pouch at a time and see if that helps. Didn't know about aspirin, chocolate, salt and onion being bad, so thank you for that Jon.

    E 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I Ilion

      Ed Gadziemski wrote:

      While [reality catches up with] ordinary people lose their homes left and right, [who "bought" houses they couldn't afford because government compelled lenders to lend to them, thus creating and feeding an unsustainable bubble in the market for housing] ...

      E Offline
      E Offline
      Ed Gadziemski
      wrote on last edited by
      #19

      I'm sorry. I guess reading comprehension failed you. This post was about commercial real estate, and it points out that commercial real estate is a problem 10 times as large as residential real estate. Perhaps your local school system offers a GED program you could participate in.

      I 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E Ed Gadziemski

        While ordinary people lose their homes left and right, the U.S. government prepares a one trillion dollar bailout of Donald Trump and other real estate moguls.

        By April, the federal government expects to have a plan to refinance office towers and shopping centers in danger of defaulting. The scale is likely to be massive: Last week Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke hinted at providing another $1 trillion in credit. Any bailout of real estate developers – some of whom are known for their extravagant living (think Donald Trump) – would essentially be part of the continuing bank rescue. “The banks have significant exposure,” says Mr. Rosen.[^]

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Chris Austin
        wrote on last edited by
        #20

        Holy Cow. Up next? Landlords nearing default? The world has gone insane, we have made the risk public and the profits private. I know a "big time" commercial investor who while being pretty bright also told me more than one not to: "throw good money at bad". Meaning that if he had a deal turn south that he would rather walk away from it and let the bank foreclose rather than finding a way to make things work. I always found that to be a bit of ethical nihilism. But, seeing now that it has been decided that the tax payer must carry these deals, I find it hard to fault the attitude. This stuff is making me feel pretty despondent.

        Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --?

        E 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Austin

          Holy Cow. Up next? Landlords nearing default? The world has gone insane, we have made the risk public and the profits private. I know a "big time" commercial investor who while being pretty bright also told me more than one not to: "throw good money at bad". Meaning that if he had a deal turn south that he would rather walk away from it and let the bank foreclose rather than finding a way to make things work. I always found that to be a bit of ethical nihilism. But, seeing now that it has been decided that the tax payer must carry these deals, I find it hard to fault the attitude. This stuff is making me feel pretty despondent.

          Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --?

          E Offline
          E Offline
          Ed Gadziemski
          wrote on last edited by
          #21

          The concept of moral hazard has apparently become obsolete. I'm for middle class tax cuts. I'm for well-policed stimulative infrastructure spending (e.g. Interstate highway system under Eisenhower and the Hoover Dam under Roosevelt). But bailing out commercial real estate speculation and credit default swaps is insane. It's like gamblers can now go to Vegas and no matter whether they win or lose, someone will pay off their bets.

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Thank you Jon for your reply. The cat is very active and playful when its not sleeping. Whiskers and Go-Cat brand leader cat foods is what I've mainly tried. Perhaps I'll try only giving it half a pouch at a time and see if that helps. Didn't know about aspirin, chocolate, salt and onion being bad, so thank you for that Jon.

            E Offline
            E Offline
            Ed Gadziemski
            wrote on last edited by
            #22

            In addition to Jon's good advice, we have a 14 year old cat who's been a very fussy eater since she was a kitten. She thinks anything other than Science Diet WD Feline is poison and won't touch it. She doesn't like milk. Be careful with the vet. Some of them will want to run thousands of dollars worth of tests and it just isn't worth it unless you believe strongly there is a correctable medical problem. Some cats are just finicky eaters. Our other cat will eat just about anything including table scraps and dog food but if she eats more than about 2 ounces, she throws it back up. She's also 14 and been that way her whole life. Cats are very different creatures from dogs, but they're worth it in their own way.

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Ed Gadziemski

              The concept of moral hazard has apparently become obsolete. I'm for middle class tax cuts. I'm for well-policed stimulative infrastructure spending (e.g. Interstate highway system under Eisenhower and the Hoover Dam under Roosevelt). But bailing out commercial real estate speculation and credit default swaps is insane. It's like gamblers can now go to Vegas and no matter whether they win or lose, someone will pay off their bets.

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Chris Austin
              wrote on last edited by
              #23

              Ed Gadziemski wrote:

              The concept of moral hazard has apparently become obsolete.

              Well put Ed.

              Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Ed Gadziemski

                In addition to Jon's good advice, we have a 14 year old cat who's been a very fussy eater since she was a kitten. She thinks anything other than Science Diet WD Feline is poison and won't touch it. She doesn't like milk. Be careful with the vet. Some of them will want to run thousands of dollars worth of tests and it just isn't worth it unless you believe strongly there is a correctable medical problem. Some cats are just finicky eaters. Our other cat will eat just about anything including table scraps and dog food but if she eats more than about 2 ounces, she throws it back up. She's also 14 and been that way her whole life. Cats are very different creatures from dogs, but they're worth it in their own way.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #24

                Thank you Ed for your reply.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O Oakman

                  Stan, I'm not sure what you think you proved by quoting the Declaration. You have at no point declared yourself to no longer be a citizen of the United States; and you have not taken up arms against it. And, as far as I know, Thomas Jefferson never wrote anything down about hoping that England would collapse into total ruin. Thomas Jefferson was declaring himself to be a traitor to his country and in an active state of rebellion. You, on the other hand, appear to be intent on asking what your country can do for you, instead of worrying in the slightest about what you can do for your country - except complain, which is certain part of the pursuit of happiness. Having compared what I know of the author of the Declaration to what I know of you, suggests to me that you and he don't have a whole lot in commonn.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Stan Shannon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #25

                  Oakman wrote:

                  Stan, I'm not sure what you think you proved by quoting the Declaration.

                  Becasue not loving your country, or at least being disappointed in it enough to want to be free of it, is also old fashioned.

                  Oakman wrote:

                  Having compared what I know of the author of the Declaration to what I know of you, suggests to me that you and he don't have a whole lot in commonn.

                  I agree with, and promote, every political principle the man actually worked to implment. I am a Jeffersonian.

                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Stan Shannon

                    Oakman wrote:

                    Stan, I'm not sure what you think you proved by quoting the Declaration.

                    Becasue not loving your country, or at least being disappointed in it enough to want to be free of it, is also old fashioned.

                    Oakman wrote:

                    Having compared what I know of the author of the Declaration to what I know of you, suggests to me that you and he don't have a whole lot in commonn.

                    I agree with, and promote, every political principle the man actually worked to implment. I am a Jeffersonian.

                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    Oakman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                    I agree with, and promote, every political principle the man actually worked to implment. I am a Jeffersonian.

                    Right, he actually worked at it. That was my point. Instead of demanding that his new country ask less of him, he pledged his life, his fortune, and his sacred honor.

                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • O Oakman

                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                      I agree with, and promote, every political principle the man actually worked to implment. I am a Jeffersonian.

                      Right, he actually worked at it. That was my point. Instead of demanding that his new country ask less of him, he pledged his life, his fortune, and his sacred honor.

                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stan Shannon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      How the hell am I asking what my country can do for me? I'm not asking my country to do anythng other than not becoming a communist state.

                      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                      O 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stan Shannon

                        How the hell am I asking what my country can do for me? I'm not asking my country to do anythng other than not becoming a communist state.

                        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                        O Offline
                        O Offline
                        Oakman
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #28

                        Every time Washington DC spends money on something you don't like, you say it is unconstitutional. When they spend money on something you approve of you either cheer, or remain mute. Again, I ask you to explain why you never argued that Washington should not fund scientific research of any sort because it is not specifically charged with doing so in the Constitution, but raise that as an objection only when they fund stem cell research. By the way, if I wanted to be cute, I'd point out that stem cell research promises to enable soldiers who have lost a limb to regrow it - make it defensible as part of maintaining the armed forces. ;)

                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Ed Gadziemski

                          I'm sorry. I guess reading comprehension failed you. This post was about commercial real estate, and it points out that commercial real estate is a problem 10 times as large as residential real estate. Perhaps your local school system offers a GED program you could participate in.

                          I Offline
                          I Offline
                          Ilion
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #29

                          And you can comprehend neither reading nor rational thinking.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups