Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Web Development
  3. combobox binding in ASP

combobox binding in ASP

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Web Development
helpdatabasewpfwcfcom
7 Posts 4 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    ramesh subbiah
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi Everybody, I have a ASP program that displays a combobox with nearly 50000 records. I have used MS-Access database. It takes nearly 4 minutes to 7 minutes to display the page over the net. Binding all the records to the combobox takes this much time. In order to solve this problem, I have used rsfast library of learnasp.com. That also takes very long time. Can any help me to solve this problem? Thanks in advance. ramesh subbiah E-Commerce India, Coimbatore

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R ramesh subbiah

      Hi Everybody, I have a ASP program that displays a combobox with nearly 50000 records. I have used MS-Access database. It takes nearly 4 minutes to 7 minutes to display the page over the net. Binding all the records to the combobox takes this much time. In order to solve this problem, I have used rsfast library of learnasp.com. That also takes very long time. Can any help me to solve this problem? Thanks in advance. ramesh subbiah E-Commerce India, Coimbatore

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Mohammed Derbashi
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      How about encapsulating the generation code in a COM object that contains compiled code(C++ or VB), which is faster than the scripting code. Mohammed Derbashi Web Developer

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Mohammed Derbashi

        How about encapsulating the generation code in a COM object that contains compiled code(C++ or VB), which is faster than the scripting code. Mohammed Derbashi Web Developer

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nick Parker
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Mohammed Derbashi wrote: How about encapsulating the generation code in a COM object that contains compiled code(C++ or VB), which is faster than the scripting code. There is a design flaw in the application, even if you were to create a COM component in VB or C++ to allow early binding to objects which does increase speed he is still going to see a lot of time degradation in the load process. 50,000 entries into a Select box is way too many, even if the file were to be loaded directly on the LAN. I would deeply suggest refactoring the application and look at ways in which you can isolate or group specific numbers, then post back to the server to get another subcategory of numbers. There is not a lot that you can do to see any dramatic decreases in load time for an application loading 50,000 entries into one page. HTH Nick Parker


        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Nick Parker

          Mohammed Derbashi wrote: How about encapsulating the generation code in a COM object that contains compiled code(C++ or VB), which is faster than the scripting code. There is a design flaw in the application, even if you were to create a COM component in VB or C++ to allow early binding to objects which does increase speed he is still going to see a lot of time degradation in the load process. 50,000 entries into a Select box is way too many, even if the file were to be loaded directly on the LAN. I would deeply suggest refactoring the application and look at ways in which you can isolate or group specific numbers, then post back to the server to get another subcategory of numbers. There is not a lot that you can do to see any dramatic decreases in load time for an application loading 50,000 entries into one page. HTH Nick Parker


          P Offline
          P Offline
          Paul Riley
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Nick Parker wrote: There is not a lot that you can do to see any dramatic decreases in load time for an application loading 50,000 entries into one page. Especially in Access. I once worked for a company who was trying to use 1,000,000+ record tables in Access (the whole table, not just a few indexed records), that took HOURS to process. Paul

          N 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Paul Riley

            Nick Parker wrote: There is not a lot that you can do to see any dramatic decreases in load time for an application loading 50,000 entries into one page. Especially in Access. I once worked for a company who was trying to use 1,000,000+ record tables in Access (the whole table, not just a few indexed records), that took HOURS to process. Paul

            N Offline
            N Offline
            Nick Parker
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Paul Riley wrote: Especially in Access. I once worked for a company who was trying to use 1,000,000+ record tables in Access (the whole table, not just a few indexed records), that took HOURS to process. All I can say is "Oh boy...." :(( Nick Parker


            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Nick Parker

              Paul Riley wrote: Especially in Access. I once worked for a company who was trying to use 1,000,000+ record tables in Access (the whole table, not just a few indexed records), that took HOURS to process. All I can say is "Oh boy...." :(( Nick Parker


              P Offline
              P Offline
              Paul Riley
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Nick Parker wrote: All I can say is "Oh boy...." :laugh: That's not quite what I said when they told me. We have a smiley for that round here somewhere. Hold on, here it is: :wtf: :-D Paul

              N 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Paul Riley

                Nick Parker wrote: All I can say is "Oh boy...." :laugh: That's not quite what I said when they told me. We have a smiley for that round here somewhere. Hold on, here it is: :wtf: :-D Paul

                N Offline
                N Offline
                Nick Parker
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Paul Riley wrote: We have a smiley for that round here somewhere. We need a *!Are You Out Of Your Mind!* emoticon. :) Nick Parker


                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups